The draft law №9055 leaves the Bar with no instruments for protection of human rights — Valentyn Gvozdii
The draft law № 9055 «On the Bar and Advocacy» leaves the people with no instruments for protection of their rights and access to professional legal assistance.
This is stated by the Deputy Head of UNBA Valentyn Gvozii in an interview for governmental channel «Rada».
«The bar should protect human rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, however, the draft law does everything to leave us with no instruments for the protection», - he said.
The Deputy Head of UNBA also said that the UNBA had addressed people’s deputies and committees of Verkhovna Rada with letters explaining potential legal risks and corruption «back-doors» of the new edition or relevant Law submitted to the Parliament.
These letters reflect the position of both supreme bar self-government bodies and regional bar councils.
«We work on raising awareness in society. Almost without exception the Bar Councils of the regions publicly criticized the draft law in their decisions. Bar Council of Ukraine has also addressed both the President and the Parliament urging to refrain from adopting the draft law», - noted Valentyn Gvozdii.
Along with that, UNBA will welcome the decisions of the Parliament Committees to submit the draft law for consideration to the Venice Commission. The existing law on advocacy was reviewed thereof back in 2012 before its adoption in the frames of preparation for signing the Association Agreement with the EU.
«We will appreciate the decision to submit the draft law for evaluation by international institutions. The decision is to be made by the relevant committee of Verkhovna Rada», - said the Deputy Head of UNBA.
According to him, the draft law is inconsistent with the goals of judicial reform that provides for strengthening of the bar as the only self-government professional organization and further strengthening of the principle of rule of law.
«There is no reason why Ukraine, moving to the rule of law, can allow the introduction of such totalitarian norms in its national legislation and allows realization of unscrupulous attempts to usurp advocacy by some individuals in legislative process" - said the Deputy Head of UNBA.
«The draft law № 9055 provoked a huge resistance from the bar community, public organizations, activists and civilians as, in fact, the mechanisms of control of advocacy, pressure on the bar and prosecution of citizens are to be presented as if they were good intentions», — considers Valentyn Gvozdii.
Because of inadmissibility of the content and objectives of the draft law there appeared alternative draft laws submitted by different fractions and non-sectarian people’s deputies under registration numbers 9055-1 and 9055-2.
«The alternative draft law are crucially different as they were cleared out of the restrictions on human rights and rights of a defender, negative effects aimed at the destruction of the institutional strength of the bar. The adoption of these draft laws would allow to avoid institutional stress, when the draft law 9055 provides for the mechanisms that would ruin the bar as self-governed institution from the inside», - commented Valentyn Gvozdii.
The amendments to the existing Law shall primarily provide for the expansion of procedural rights of advocates and guarantees of advocacy.
Among the main risks of the draft law, Valenyn Gvozdii named the narrowing of procedural rights through the proposed amendments to CPC, namely, the limitation of the content of the notion of «attorney-client privilege», the ability to remove an advocate for the abuse of procedural rights, or involve a public defender in the case where there is already an existing advocate contracted by a client at law enforcement agencies’ discretion, nullification of effectiveness of advocate’s request. In addition, the institutional separation of the system of national bar self-governing by federal principle that deprives lawyers of the "one voice of the profession", which is an effective means for defense of the rights of advocates both within the country and internationally.
We recall that the Bar Council of Ukraine supported alternative draft laws "On the Bar and Advocacy".
Popular news
Advocacy
FLA needs urgent help, - Valentyn Gvozdiy
Twelve years of existence of the free legal aid system in Ukraine is enough to understand the inability of the Ministry of Justice to effectively manage this area.
Advocacy
The Ombudsman is concerned about the state of the FLA system
The Secretariat of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights is ready to join the development of proposals for amendments to the legal acts developed by the Ukrainian National Bar Association that will improve the functioning of the free legal aid system.
Advocacy
Ombudsman to provide legal aid with support of UNBA - pilot project
The Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights has launched a pilot project to provide professional legal aid to citizens in five regions of Ukraine.
Advocacy
Another model should be introduced for the FLA system, - Lidiya Izovitova
Monitoring of the current state of functioning of the legal aid system shows the existence of significant and conceptual problems in the implementation of this assistance in Ukraine.
Advocacy
Violation of media guarantees of advocacy is being studied by the UNBA
An open appeal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Information Policy and Interaction with the Mass Media to the advocates.
Advocacy
Lawyers are offered to be booked - amendments to draft law No. 10449
In their amendments to the draft law on strengthening mobilization, MPs propose to provide for the booking of lawyers. The goal is to prevent disruptions of court hearings.
Advocacy
E-Court failures violate constitutional guarantees – UNBA
In recent days, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has received numerous reports from lawyers about technical failures in the operation of the Electronic Court subsystem. In particular, the complaints relate to the inability to log in to the electronic office, which restricts advocates in exercising their procedural rights, in particular, to submit documents and participate in court hearings in the videoconference mode.
Advocacy
Fixed fee: time of work is important for reimbursement of attorney's fees – SC
The procedure for calculating the hourly fee differs from the fixed fee, which does not take into account the actual time spent. However, in both cases, they are taken into account when deciding on the reimbursement of legal aid expenses.
Publications
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…