UNBA supports the need to form the Supreme Court of Intellectual Property - Valentyn Hvozdiy

Advocacy
16:08 Mon 08.02.21 209 Reviews
Print

          In Ukraine, the establishment of the Supreme Court of Intellectual Property is an important process of modern judicial reform aimed at improving the functioning of the judicial system as a whole, as well as the system of protection of intellectual property rights. Improving the system of protection of intellectual property rights is part of Ukraine’s international obligations.

          This was emphasized by the Deputy Head of Ukrainian National Bar Association (hereinafter – the “UNBA”) and the Bar Council of Ukraine (hereinafter – the “BCU”) Valentyn Hvozdiy during a speech at the round table discussion "Supreme Court of Intellectual Property: the state of formation”. The event is organized by the relevant committee of UNBA.

          "Ukrainian National Bar Association actively supports the formation of the Supreme Court of Intellectual Property, because we all understand the need of immediate beginning of the work of this court. The procedure for selecting candidates for the position of judges will take place under the watchful eye of the attorney’s community. In particular, today's event, initiated by the UNBA Intellectual Property Committee, is an indicator of the importance of this issue for the bar” - said Valentyn Hvozdiy.

          He reminded that Ukraine is a party to a number of bilateral and multilateral international agreements governing the protection of intellectual property rights, including the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRAIPR) and the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU.

          "Active protection and development of intellectual property rights are especially important for Ukraine, which should be proud of its innovative achievements and inventions. All these aspects are real aims that we could achieve thanks to the large number of intellectual elites who practice in this field in Ukraine. Intellectual property rights are closely linked to creativity, innovation, economic growth, and prosperity, but these opportunities can be realized only with the appropriate judicial protection of intellectual property rights by independent courts" - said Valentin Gvozdiy.

          Ukraine already has a legislative framework related to the establishment and operation of the Supreme Court of Intellectual Property. This is the decree of the President of Ukraine № 299/217 dated September 29, 2017 "On the establishment of the Supreme Court of Intellectual Property"; a new version of the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine, which establishes the procedure for resolving disputes in the newly created Court of IP and the order of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine № 929 dated 30 September 2017 "On determining the number of judges in the Supreme Court of Intellectual Property".

          In his speech, Valentyn Hvozdiy stressed the fact that the establishment of the IP Court will be perceived as a positive signal to the public about the state's respect for intellectual property. Creating a professional, transparent, and predictable system of judicial protection in the field of intellectual property rights in Ukraine will help increase business confidence in the entire judicial system of Ukraine and will be a favorable environment for investment, innovation, and creativity, which will affect economic growth and prosperity. The advantage of creating a specialized court is that it is a more competent body to consider the relevant cases and, in particular, less dependent on technical experts in decision-making.

          "A specialized court is able to be much more aware of developments in these areas of law than non-specialized courts. In addition, a higher level of special knowledge of judges can reduce dependence on technical experts when making decisions, which in turn improves the quality of proceedings and impartiality of court decisions" - said Valentyn Hvozdiy.

          At the same time, it is necessary that the procedure for selecting judges for this court to be objective, free from corruption-causing factors, and provide the high requirements for having proper knowledge in this area of ​​law. As the Intellectual Property Court is planned to be located in Kyiv, it is necessary to ensure the possibility of holding its meetings by video conference for citizens to have equal access to this court. The procedure and form of submission of electronic evidence must also be clearly defined.

          You may check the program of the round table here.

Popular news

Advocacy

Another model should be introduced for the FLA system, - Lidiya Izovitova

Monitoring of the current state of functioning of the legal aid system shows the existence of significant and conceptual problems in the implementation of this assistance in Ukraine.

12:32 Tue 19.03.24 134

Advocacy

Violation of media guarantees of advocacy is being studied by the UNBA

An open appeal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Information Policy and Interaction with the Mass Media to the advocates.

18:48 Mon 04.03.24 150

Advocacy

Lawyers are offered to be booked - amendments to draft law No. 10449

In their amendments to the draft law on strengthening mobilization, MPs propose to provide for the booking of lawyers. The goal is to prevent disruptions of court hearings.

13:48 Fri 01.03.24 174

Advocacy

E-Court failures violate constitutional guarantees – UNBA

In recent days, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has received numerous reports from lawyers about technical failures in the operation of the Electronic Court subsystem. In particular, the complaints relate to the inability to log in to the electronic office, which restricts advocates in exercising their procedural rights, in particular, to submit documents and participate in court hearings in the videoconference mode.

18:05 Thu 29.02.24 179

Advocacy

Fixed fee: time of work is important for reimbursement of attorney's fees – SC

The procedure for calculating the hourly fee differs from the fixed fee, which does not take into account the actual time spent. However, in both cases, they are taken into account when deciding on the reimbursement of legal aid expenses.

13:22 Thu 29.02.24 171

Advocacy

Attorneys' declarations: what does the changing position of the NAPC indicate?

When the Constitutional Court began to consider the case on the submission of declarations by representatives of the bar's disciplinary bodies, the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption declared a constitutional crisis and threats to the entire declaration system. But earlier, officials had a completely different opinion on this issue.

17:43 Fri 23.02.24 149

Advocacy

The price of a claim for minor disputes will be significantly reduced - draft law

The current amounts of the claim price (as a criterion for classifying a case as minor) are significantly higher than the subsistence minimum and minimum wage and do not correspond to the understanding of the case and the dispute in it as minor. Accordingly, they should be revised downward.

16:58 Wed 21.02.24 131

Advocacy

The BCU has removed controversial issues of training standards for young lawyers

The Procedure for the Continuing Legal Education of Advocates of Ukraine provides for special requirements for training in the first three years (after obtaining a certificate) of an advocate's practice. In practice, technical issues have arisen in the application of these requirements.

15:14 Thu 15.02.24 191

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл