The UNBA urges to abandon the idea of dismissal of judges after their initial five-year term of office
The UNBA requests the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko, as Guarantor of the Constitution, to ensure the right to access to justice by promoting the stable operation of the judicial system and to prevent politically motivated dismissal of judges from their posts.
This was referred to in the UNBA statement, which was also sent to the Speaker and leaders of parliamentary factions and the VRU special committee.
The reason for this request was the submission of amendments to the Law "On the High Council of Justice", which provides for a complete termination of labour relations with judges initially appointed for five years after the expiry of that term, with the subsequent exclusion of such judges from the members of relevant courts.
The UNBA requests the Parliamentary Committee on Legal Policy and Justice to reject the relevant amendments to the Law of Ukraine "On the High Council of Justice". The bar expresses a clear warning that a large-scale dismissal of judges is taking place in the judiciary.
"If there are courts with no judges already today, it is a disturbing symptom of the coming collapse of the judicial system. This is serious reason to believe that this is being made deliberately, also by way of introduction of such legislation. Victims of these mistakes will be all citizens of Ukraine, because they will be deprived of real opportunities to defend in courts their rights and legitimate interests, and the confidence of the society in the judiciary will decrease. Unfortunately, we can say that expectations of positive changes as a result of the judicial reform may not materialize. Due to the populism and the lack of professionalism on the part of some politicians and officials, the contents of this comprehensive reform risk being distorted up to the point that people are actually denied the right of access to justice", - referred the statement.
According to official information of the High Qualification Commission of Judges and the State Court Administration, as of today, due to the expiry of the initial five-year term, 969 judges do not carry justice. And as of 1 June 2016, more than 90% of the courts in Ukraine had 50% or less of active judges. There are also courts where there are no judges with authority at all. This situation leads to the fact that in certain administrative and territorial units of Ukraine citizens are denied the right to judicial protection guaranteed by Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine.
In the UNBA opinion, the adoption of the aforementioned draft law will negatively affect the professionalism of the judiciary.
Evaluating such a draft law, one cannot overlook recommendations of the European partners. The initial five-year appointment to the post of a judge has always been considered by the European experts as an unacceptable approach that includes a possibility of political influence on the judiciary. In terms of professionalism of consideration of cases and the workload of judges, this approach is devoid of logic, as judges with a five-year term of appointment consider no less complex cases than their colleagues appointed for life.
"To take away their positions due to the procedure of appointment, under which they have entered the profession in accordance with the previous version of the Constitution, looks like a banal shifting of responsibility", - referred to the statement.
The UNBA predicts that as the result of the adoption of these legislative changes during 2017, about a thousand qualitatively trained, experienced, competent and respected judges will be dismissed.
"The society may certainly have reasonable questions concerning the integrity of certain holders of a mantle, but for addressing these issues, the legislation envisages an attestation procedure rather than a populist and political approach to their exclusion from the judiciary" - emphasized the statement.Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Lidiya Izovitova: reform of the advocacy profession should make the profession stronger and individuals better protected
The Ukrainian advocacy community is finalizing work on a new version of the relevant law. The roadmap on the rule of law has set the fourth quarter of 2026 as the deadline for achieving results in this area. The draft is intended to ensure safeguards for the practice of law through mechanisms of accountability for violations.
Abroad
The first country to ratify the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
Bosnia and Herzegovina became the first country to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer (CETS No. 226). The country signed the Convention on March 17, 2026, so it took just over seven months to ratify it.
Support
In Edinburgh expressed gratitude to those who are helping Ukrainian advocates and citizens
Since the start of the full-scale invasion, Scottish legal institutions and the Ukrainian community, with the participation of the UNBA, have been helping Ukrainian advocates obtain their qualifications and Ukrainians receive legal assistance. The parties are now planning joint professional and educational events.
Educational events
What to do when you need immediate protection in the LCIA
A dispute with a counterparty has been referred to the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), but it will take several weeks to appoint the arbitrators, and the client needs legal representation immediately? This can be achieved through an emergency arbitrator or expedited tribunal formation.
Educational events
An advocate's meeting with a client outside the office: how to conduct it without giving away too much
If a client suggests meeting in a public place, keep in mind that any name or amount mentioned aloud could be overheard by bystanders. Therefore, it’s important to plan ahead regarding the table, seating arrangements, and the scope of the conversation.
Legislation
The UNBA explained what could undermine the plan to introduce plea agreements
Information regarding who pays whom, how much, and on what grounds under a plea agreement must be made public. However, as long as this information is classified as a state secret or personal data, the court will continue to be able to close proceedings and restrict access to judgments.
Interaction
The UNBA and the German Institute for Eastern Law will prepare joint legal opinions
Ukrainian advocates and German legal scholars will jointly prepare comparative legal studies, expert opinions, and professional events. The UNBA reached this agreement with the Institute for Eastern European Law in Regensburg, which has been researching the laws of Central and Eastern European countries for nearly 70 years.
Educational events
What an advocate can delegate to an assistant, colleagues and AI — and what they cannot
An advocate can delegate even a complex lawsuit to an assistant, consult with colleagues daily, and ask artificial intelligence to find relevant case law. However, it is up to the advocate to proofread the document, verify every reference, and decide what to disclose about the client’s case.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection