Reform of the Bar with the participation of the Bar is an international standard practice — interview of Lidiia Izovitova

Advocacy
18:06 Mon 20.11.17 772 Reviews
Print

“Reform of the Bar with the participation of the Bar is an international standard practice. If it is not followed, then all further steps in the work on the draft law can be regarded as an attack against the independence of legal profession”, — commented on the course of the Bar reform the UNBA President Lidiia Izovitova in her interview to newspaper “Zakon i Biznes”.

However, the key requirements for attracting UNBA as an official representative of the Bar and publishing the text of the draft law are still not fulfilled. Something strange is going on. In October this year the draft law, in its revised and unknown for us version, was submitted to the Council of Europe international experts for evaluation. The UNBA learned about it by accident from the working letter of the Council of Europe Office in Ukraine. We were not told who exactly passed such a decision and which text of the draft law was submitted to experts.

“The Bar Council of Ukraine has twice publicly voiced its opinion on the inadmissibility of the preparation of amendments to the Law “On the Bar and Practice of Law” and the devastating ideas embodied in this document. For the first time, on December 15, 2016 – on the day of approval by the working group of this draft law – in its open statement the BCU drew attention to the “toning up” and substitution of the goals of the Bar reform”, — told the UNBA President about amendments to the Law in her interview to newspaper “Zakon i Biznes”.

“Among other things, we pointed out the significant contradictions and inconsistencies of the draft law, adopted by the working group, with the Presidential Decree No. 276/2015 “On the Strategy for Reforming the Judiciary, Justice and Related Legal Institutions for 2015-2020”. This Strategy, in particular, provides for “strengthening at the institutional level of the Ukrainian National Bar Association to ensure proper professional activities of the Bar, management of legal professions and representation of collective interests of all advocates”, and this document is still valid. At that time the BCU's position was immediately supported by the largest professional bar organization in Europe – the CCBE”, — explained Lidiia Izovitova.

The UNBA President reminded that UNBA representatives were not included in the Judicial Reform Council, and the actual reform of the Bar is entrusted to a working group with uncertain status, powers, inadequate representation, variable composition and covert decisions, for which it is not entitled.

“The reform is carried out in a closed behind-the-scenes regime, in spite of all declarations of democracy and transparency of this process. In these circumstances, there is no compliance with European standards.

Within these 5 years we have defended our independence, but we are prevented from becoming truly powerful. The attempts to intervene in our powers, in particular, the establishment of advocates' contributions at the legislative level, indicate that our State does not need powerful and independent bar organization” — told the UNBA President Lidiia Izovitova.

On December 23, 2016 the ССВЕ has sent an intervention letter to the leadership of Ukraine calling to refrain from introducing any changes to the relevant legislation without consulting the Ukrainian National Bar Association.  But these declarations are yet ignored by Ukrainian government.

The Law provides the advocates with a fair amount of rights and guarantees. But in practice we observe a total violation of these norms. The UNBA believes that the advocates are better protected than the ordinary citizens only due to the corporate solidarity and legal competence.

Full text of the interview can be found by following this link.


 

Popular news

BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases

Practice of law

BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases

In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?

13:12 Tue 28.10.25 110
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions

Edition

Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions

The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.

18:42 Fri 24.10.25 161
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun

Announcements

Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun

The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».

17:48 Fri 24.10.25 156
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?

Abroad

Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?

Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.

15:13 Fri 24.10.25 150
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability

Discussion

Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability

On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.

13:17 Fri 24.10.25 200
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues

Abroad

The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues

The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.

17:28 Wed 22.10.25 198
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel

Legal defence of military personnel

When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel

The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.

12:03 Wed 22.10.25 165
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly

Self-government

Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly

A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.

13:32 Tue 21.10.25 159

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл