Bar reform cannot be introduced contrary to European standards — Ivan Hrechkivskyi

Advocacy
13:43 Tue 05.12.17 962 Reviews
Print

The Bar reform cannot be introduced contrary to European standards and by substituting the subject of legal profession representation.

This was mentioned by Ivan Hrechkivskyi, the Head of the International Relations Committee in his interview to Yurydychna Praktyka Newspaper.

“UNBA, as a representative of the Bar, is not opposed to the changes as such. But we are against the way they are trying to change our law. We are against the substitution of the concepts and the removal of UNBA from the decision-making on the future of the Bar. And this is not a whim, it is a fundamental principle of the independence of advocates, approved by the United Nations in 1990: if there is an independent association of advocates in the State, any further amendments to the law on the Bar shall be implemented with the participation of representatives of the legal profession”, — said Ivan Hrechkivskyi.

According to him, the submission of a draft law, approved without the participation of UNBA representatives, for the assessment by international experts of the Council of Europe also substitutes the international instruments for obtaining a full assessment of laws on compliance with the standards of law and democracy.

“There is also a substitution of concepts in the address to the Council of Europe experts. Its experts have only the right to determine whether the proposed changes comply with the minimum standards of independence of the Bar or not. Most likely, they meet the minimum standards. Another thing is that the standards laid down by the effective law are much higher than the minimum. However, the Council of Europe experts do not have the right to compare two documents, since it is an exclusive right of the Venice Commission, which, by the way, has highly assessed the current law twice”, — said the Head of the UNBA Committee.

Given the above, the UNBA, with the support of ССВЕ, will initiate a full assessment of the draft law by the European Commission for Democracy through Law.

“The CCBE and, in particular, the PECO committee members dealing with the problems of the Bars in the countries of Eastern Europe, do not understand the approaches taken by the Ukrainian authorities to solve the issues of the Bar, and, of course, they express their support not so much to us personally, but to the fundamental principles of independence of the Bar, which should be observed by civilized countries”, — said Ivan Hrechkivskyi.

Full text of the interview can be found by following this link.

Popular news

UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts

Legislation

UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts

International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.

14:34 Wed 07.01.26 157
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?

Legislation

How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?

The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».

15:35 Tue 06.01.26 138
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy

Legislation

Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy

The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.

19:31 Fri 02.01.26 125
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny

Legislation

Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny

Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.

19:13 Fri 02.01.26 107
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting

Legislation

Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting

On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.

18:24 Fri 02.01.26 113
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference

Self-government

BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference

The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.

14:21 Wed 31.12.25 181
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published

Self-government

UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published

In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.

14:56 Tue 23.12.25 162
The results of the CISA cannot be used in disciplinary proceedings against advocates – BCU

Professional Conduct

The results of the CISA cannot be used in disciplinary proceedings against advocates – BCU

Materials obtained through covert investigative (search) activities involving interference in private communications cannot be transferred or used in disciplinary proceedings against advocates. This is because the Code of Criminal Procedure does not allow investigators or prosecutors to use such materials outside of criminal proceedings.

17:19 Sat 13.12.25 112

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл