Approval of the UNBA needs report is unacceptable



Approval of the Report "On the Needs Assessment Conducted in Respect of the Self-governance of Lawyers in Ukraine", which was composed by international experts within the framework of Council of Europe project ‘Consolidating Ukraine’s Justice Sector Reform’ is unacceptable - statement by UNBA/BCU President Lidia Izovitova during the session of the Bar Council of Ukraine.
"We cannot allow this report to be approved," - said the leader of UNBA, noting the biased nature of the analysis of the state of affairs in the Bar. Citing her statement, the report adopted numerous provisions from the draft law "On amendments to the law "On the Bar and Practice of Law", that the Bar firmly opposed.
UNBA received the final version of the report several hours before presentation. The previous draft of the report received a huge amount of feedback from advocates. The summary comments were laid out on 58 pages and were sent to the Council of Europe Office in Ukraine, but it was mostly ignored during preparation of the report.
"Unfortunately, the experts failed to study the current legislation, acts of UNBA, and thus did not understand how this system works, and reached baseless conclusions", - noted Lidiya Izovitova.
"This report left out important things, instead focused on the destruction of a professional organization and its independence, as opposed to institutional strengthening thereof. The analysis of the current law has not been taken into account. It is an attempt to substitute the expertise of the Venice Commission with expertise of two people," said the UNBA/BCU Vice-President Valentyn Gvozdiy.
Among other devastating proposals, he named the creation of regional chambers of the Bar, that are supposed to unite self-governance in every region; the division of the system of Qualification and Disciplinary Commissions into separate vertically integrated corporations, contrary to the Venice Commission's opinion from 2011, changing the procedure for bar exams, which require presence of three representatives of the future High Qualifications Commission. The report literally recommends to unbalance system of Bar self-government, in fact, render Bar Council of Ukraine and Ukrainian National Bar Association largely irrelevant; it is proposed to fix UNBA President’s term in office to two years, while elect Presidents of regional Chambers of the Bar for five, while the latter is vested with the power to unilaterally manage the entire Bar self-government in the region and dispose of its funds without any oversight.
The report also suggests to impose single-level administration of URAU, where every Chamber of the Bar will be authorized to make unverifiable entries - without a monitoring mechanism at the national level. The consequences of uncontrolled entering of the data into the URAU obviously does not need further comments.
"The suggested model, as our opponents seek it, would probably work in a federated state, not the unitary one, as provided in our Constitution," emphasized Valentyn Gvozdiy.
HQDCB Chairman Aleksandr Drozdov also noted that reference to German model is a questionable at best, while experts’ recommendations to use experience from Poland do not take into account the fact that the Bar reform of the advocacy in this nation was found to be unconstitutional in many respects.
"Experts for some reason keep silent about other approaches, for example those of the United States or Great Britain, where the internship must be undertaken after Bar exam. This experience is ignored for some reason, while we apply it and it yields positive results" said Aleksandr Drozdov.
The report recommended to limit the sources of income for the independent Bar, regardless of the fact that as a matter of law it has already been limited. Thus, the basis for independent organizational activity gradually fades away.Popular news

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

Advocacy
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.

Advocacy
Searching for a model of elections for post-war Ukraine: conclusions of the round table
Reforming Ukraine's electoral system is extremely important in the context of the upcoming post-war elections. In particular, the realization of the right to vote should be facilitated by improving the voting system. But today Ukraine faces numerous challenges.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…