Razorous changes in the system of Bar self-government can become a fatal mistake in the entire reform of justice

Advocacy
14:04 Fri 09.02.18 853 Reviews
Print

That is the key message of the Resolution, of the Joint Meeting of the Chairs of the Regional Bar Councils, QDCBs, jointly with members of the Bar Council of Ukraine, adopted on February 8, 2018.

The delegates of the meeting got acquainted with the content of the draft law 'On amendments to the Law of Ukraine 'On the Bar and Practice of Law,' developed by CJR Workgroup on Amending Legislation on the Bar, Prosecution and Legal Aid. Representatives of the Bar self-government spoke out against the provisions of the draft law concerning the organization of the profession - from the creation of regional chambers through the elimination of 54 legal entities - current bodies of Bar self-government, to convocating conferences in general format without approved agenda and representation quota affixed by decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine.


 

During the discussion, representatives of regional self-government from all over Ukraine concluded that reform should take place on an institutional basis of the current model of the Bar. At the same time, the draft submitted by UNBA as an alternative to the WorkGroup's proposals took into account the opinions of regional Bar communities, practical five-year experience of existing self-government and implemented best practices of European advocacy. UNBA maintains systematic cooperation with the European Bars. In favor of such an evolutionary approach stand the fact that the current law regulating the profession is in line with the Joint Opinion Venice Commission's and DG-1 as of October 2011, Ukraine's commitments to PACE and the current standards of the European Union. The adoption of this law was one of the conditions for the conclusion of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, which is also enshrined in bilateral international instruments.

Conceptually, the further reform should be based on this foundation, in full compliance with the PACE recommendations, the binding instruments of the Council of Europe and European Union.

Representatives of regional Bar self-government, members of the Bar Council of Ukraine, oppose the change limiting access to profession proposed by the WorkGroup. In fact, the ideologists of the draft law created obstacles hindering access to the profession, by narrowing down admittance to the profession to judges only, or interns that have work under lawyer's supervision for two years. Only these two categories will be allowed to take the Bar exam. In the Transitional Provisions, the draft law contains the proposal to allow, in the until 2021, for anyone with a relevant degree to take the Bar Exam and get a license without the mandatory internship. In addition, the authors suggested that the exam to be administered by a single body - the prospective High Qualifications Commission of the Bar, and in this way the right of appeal against examination results lo longer available. Such approach is devastating for the profession. These "innovations" will bring the quality advocates' corps to the bottom, will open the floodgates to the people who do not have skills and experience, are not aware of the practical meaning of ethical norms, having no sense of justice.


 

Following the discussion, the delegates decided to:

-reject the proposed version of the draft law devised by WorkGroup, especially their vision for implementing the provisions of the Constitution regarding the exclusive right to represent clients in courts;

-dismiss all proposals to eliminate of the established forms of Bar self-government, which weakens the organization, and as a result, hamper its development and independence;

-remove paragraphs of the Transitional Provisions on a simplified procedure for access to the profession until 2021, establishing unjustified preferences for judges and prosecutors;

- prevent a series of corruption opportunities of the WorkGroup's draft law, which otherwise will provide room for abuses in the exercise of self-government at both the regional and national level;

- support development of the Bar in the direction of strengthening the rights and guarantees of the profession and approve the UNBA proposed amendments to the Law on the Bar and Practice of Law, the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Tax Code;

- support the implementation of all necessary changes that clearly establish the powers of Bar self-government, improve the relations between national and regional bodies, provide a transparent mechanism for the formation of these bodies, based on the existing model of self-government, which according to the Council of Europe experts (Opinion as of December 21, 2017) complies with European standards and has proved its effectiveness for 5 years of its existence;

-maintain the current procedure for administration of Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, featuring two-level data entry and integrity control;

-maintain the current procedure of qualification-disciplinary procedures on the basis of existing institutions, created under the Law of Ukraine "On the Bar and Practice of Law" - Qualification-Disciplinary Commissions of the Bar and Higher Qualification-Disciplinary Commission of the Bar.

This position will be presented during "Lawyer's Self-Government: Ways of Improvement" roundtable, which will be held on February 9, 2018, in Kyiv. The text of the Resolution was sent to the Secretariat of Council for Judicial Reform.

Popular news

BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases

Practice of law

BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases

In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?

13:12 Tue 28.10.25 132
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions

Edition

Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions

The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.

18:42 Fri 24.10.25 179
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun

Announcements

Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun

The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».

17:48 Fri 24.10.25 177
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?

Abroad

Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?

Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.

15:13 Fri 24.10.25 168
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability

Discussion

Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability

On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.

13:17 Fri 24.10.25 233
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues

Abroad

The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues

The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.

17:28 Wed 22.10.25 234
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel

Legal defence of military personnel

When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel

The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.

12:03 Wed 22.10.25 187
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly

Self-government

Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly

A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.

13:32 Tue 21.10.25 178

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл