Razorous changes in the system of Bar self-government can become a fatal mistake in the entire reform of justice
That is the key message of the Resolution, of the Joint Meeting of the Chairs of the Regional Bar Councils, QDCBs, jointly with members of the Bar Council of Ukraine, adopted on February 8, 2018.
The delegates of the meeting got acquainted with the content of the draft law 'On amendments to the Law of Ukraine 'On the Bar and Practice of Law,' developed by CJR Workgroup on Amending Legislation on the Bar, Prosecution and Legal Aid. Representatives of the Bar self-government spoke out against the provisions of the draft law concerning the organization of the profession - from the creation of regional chambers through the elimination of 54 legal entities - current bodies of Bar self-government, to convocating conferences in general format without approved agenda and representation quota affixed by decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine.
During the discussion, representatives of regional self-government from all over Ukraine concluded that reform should take place on an institutional basis of the current model of the Bar. At the same time, the draft submitted by UNBA as an alternative to the WorkGroup's proposals took into account the opinions of regional Bar communities, practical five-year experience of existing self-government and implemented best practices of European advocacy. UNBA maintains systematic cooperation with the European Bars. In favor of such an evolutionary approach stand the fact that the current law regulating the profession is in line with the Joint Opinion Venice Commission's and DG-1 as of October 2011, Ukraine's commitments to PACE and the current standards of the European Union. The adoption of this law was one of the conditions for the conclusion of the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, which is also enshrined in bilateral international instruments.
Conceptually, the further reform should be based on this foundation, in full compliance with the PACE recommendations, the binding instruments of the Council of Europe and European Union.
Representatives of regional Bar self-government, members of the Bar Council of Ukraine, oppose the change limiting access to profession proposed by the WorkGroup. In fact, the ideologists of the draft law created obstacles hindering access to the profession, by narrowing down admittance to the profession to judges only, or interns that have work under lawyer's supervision for two years. Only these two categories will be allowed to take the Bar exam. In the Transitional Provisions, the draft law contains the proposal to allow, in the until 2021, for anyone with a relevant degree to take the Bar Exam and get a license without the mandatory internship. In addition, the authors suggested that the exam to be administered by a single body - the prospective High Qualifications Commission of the Bar, and in this way the right of appeal against examination results lo longer available. Such approach is devastating for the profession. These "innovations" will bring the quality advocates' corps to the bottom, will open the floodgates to the people who do not have skills and experience, are not aware of the practical meaning of ethical norms, having no sense of justice.
Following the discussion, the delegates decided to:
-reject the proposed version of the draft law devised by WorkGroup, especially their vision for implementing the provisions of the Constitution regarding the exclusive right to represent clients in courts;
-dismiss all proposals to eliminate of the established forms of Bar self-government, which weakens the organization, and as a result, hamper its development and independence;
-remove paragraphs of the Transitional Provisions on a simplified procedure for access to the profession until 2021, establishing unjustified preferences for judges and prosecutors;
- prevent a series of corruption opportunities of the WorkGroup's draft law, which otherwise will provide room for abuses in the exercise of self-government at both the regional and national level;
- support development of the Bar in the direction of strengthening the rights and guarantees of the profession and approve the UNBA proposed amendments to the Law on the Bar and Practice of Law, the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Tax Code;
- support the implementation of all necessary changes that clearly establish the powers of Bar self-government, improve the relations between national and regional bodies, provide a transparent mechanism for the formation of these bodies, based on the existing model of self-government, which according to the Council of Europe experts (Opinion as of December 21, 2017) complies with European standards and has proved its effectiveness for 5 years of its existence;
-maintain the current procedure for administration of Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, featuring two-level data entry and integrity control;
-maintain the current procedure of qualification-disciplinary procedures on the basis of existing institutions, created under the Law of Ukraine "On the Bar and Practice of Law" - Qualification-Disciplinary Commissions of the Bar and Higher Qualification-Disciplinary Commission of the Bar.
This position will be presented during "Lawyer's Self-Government: Ways of Improvement" roundtable, which will be held on February 9, 2018, in Kyiv. The text of the Resolution was sent to the Secretariat of Council for Judicial Reform.
Popular news
URAU
Access to advocate contacts in URAU has been restored
The Bar Council of Ukraine has opened up public access to data from the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, which was closed at the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. The decision was made at a meeting on December 12–13.
Self-government
Members of the QDCB are not required to submit declarations - BCU
Bar Council of Ukraine examined the legal status of members of bar self-government bodies and found that they are not required to submit declarations of persons authorized to perform functions of state or local self-government.
Self-government
BCU has identified 12 areas for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
During its meeting on December 12, the Bar Council of Ukraine considered the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, approved by Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 475-r dated May 14, 2025. The document provides for the development and adoption of a draft law on improving the legal regulation of advocacy by the fourth quarter of 2026.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The Ombudsman acknowledged the problem of violation of the human right to legal aid in the TCC
The Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for human rights Dmytro Lubinets confirmed the existence of a problem with ensuring the constitutional right to professional legal assistance in territorial recruitment and social support centers.
Discussion
Why preventive measures have turned into preventive punishment in Ukraine: round table discussion
The European approach, enshrined in the CPC, provides for detention as an exceptional preventive measure: courts must prove the impossibility of milder alternatives and carefully assess the risks. In practice, however, it is increasingly being applied almost automatically, eroding standards of freedom.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The UNBA presented a report on violations of advocates' rights in the TCC
The Committee for the protection of advocate's rights and guarantees of legal practice of the UNBA has prepared a consolidated report on violations of advocate's professional rights and guarantees of legal practice by territorial recruitment and social support centers for the period from 2022 to the first half of 2025.
Self-government
Statement by the UNBA Committee regarding manipulative journalistic material
Statement by the UNBA Committee on information policy and interaction with the media regarding manipulative journalistic material aimed at discrediting the advocacy institution.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Dispute over fees: BCU explained the possibility of disclosing information subject to advocate-client privilege
In certain cases, an advocate may be exempt from the obligation to maintain attorney-client privilege. The Bar Council of Ukraine considered a practical situation in which an advocate needed to transfer documents prepared while working with a previous client to a colleague in order to protect his own rights in court.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences