The draft law 9055 restricts the rights of advocates and undermines the protection of people — Lidiia Izovitova
Submitted by the President of Ukraine the draft law 9055 “On the Bar and Practice of Law” restricts the rights of advocates and undermines their ability to protect people.
This was stated by the President of UNBA, BCU Lidiia Izovitova during a speech at the seminar on professional development for advocates in Kherson region.
The draft law was developed by the Judicial Reform Council, which did not include representatives of UNBA.
“Thus, the developers of this project had violated Ukraine's obligations before the Council of Europe and violated the terms and conditions of the agreement on Association with the EU, as the draft law on the bar was developed without the participation of professional legal organisations”, said Lidiia Izovitova.
In content, the draft law bears significant threats of narrowing the professional rights of advocates. In particular, the extended notion of the advocate's request is leveled down by the possibilities of refusals in the responses to these requests. The draft law provides for the amendment of the Criminal Procedure Code that would allow the court to determine abuse of the procedural rights by the parties. The possibility of violations in case of suspicion of special subjects has been expanded.
“We are talking about restricting the rights of advocates and about the destruction of people's rights, because in court we don't represent ourselves, but protect the rights and interests of citizens. This is an attack on human rights, it is a violation of constitutional norms, the ECHR practices and decisions of the Constitutional Court”, said Lidiia Izovitova.
The draft law allows the investigator or the prosecutor to bring an advocate from the free legal aid system at their own discretion, who will operate in parallel with an advocate under contract. This negates the right to free choice of defender and turns advocates into mere underparts.
In the part of the bar self-government, the draft law provides for the liquidation of existing bar self-government bodies as legal entities and the establishment of new bodies according to another model. Moreover, the advocates' conferences are held in the format of general meetings of advocates in the region.“ In a region with 5 thousand advocates, these meetings can only be held at the stadium. With that, the draft law proposes to adopt decision by secret ballot. We already have cloned structures in Kyiv, which conduct parallel conferences, and they are said to be legitimate. We expect that large regions will have both parallel conferences and parallel bar self-government bodies, which will be busy trying to find out which is the one legitimate. This is called the destruction of the bar self-government,” said Lidiia Izovitova.
Overall, the seminar was attended by nearly 150 advocates from Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv and Cherkasy regions.
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
Discussion
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks
The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Discussion
AI in advocacy and justice: ethics, regulation, limits of application
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a roundtable discussion entitled «Artificial Intelligence in the цork of advocates: ethics, responsibility, legal process engineering». Participants discussed how artificial intelligence systems are already being used in the professional activities of advocates and where the ethical boundaries of what is permissible lie.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates