The contents of the draft law 9055 are inconsistent with international standards and democratic procedures for the implementation of reforms



On September 7, the Bar Council of Ukraine created a working group for the analysis of the draft law 9055 “On the Bar and Practice of Law”, submitted to the Verkhovna Rada by the President of Ukraine on September 6, 2018. Consideration of this draft law is determined by the President as urgent.
In accordance with the assessment of the working group, the contents of the draft law 9055 are inconsistent with international standards and democratic procedures for the implementation of reforms. In fact, it is proposed to introduce a federal model for the bar that does not meet the contemporary needs of the human and citizen rights protection.
The position of the BCU is that inherently any changes to the specific legislation should ensure further approximation of the bar to European standards. Priority in this process should be strengthening the protection of the rights of advocates and guarantees to practice law. It is not only a matter of professional interest, but also a matter of protection of the rights of citizens and functioning of Ukraine as a country with the rule of law.
Unfortunately, the draft law 9055 submitted to the Parliament may lead to erroneous or evidently harmful legal experiments, creating chaos in the legal regulation of the practice of law, largely servicing the clandestine needs of certain individuals.
The proposed draft law 9055 contains the threat of destruction of institutional guarantees of the independence of the bar — bar self-government and self-regulation of the profession. Essentially, the bar is being wound 30 years back in its development.
The draft law 9055 eliminates European standards, including standards of an independent bar self-government. BCU believes that the adoption of the draft law 9055 would contradict the general logic of the European course of the country, numerous international instruments and, ultimately, the Strategy for reforming the judiciary, justice and related legal institutions, approved by Presidential Decree No. 276 dated May 20, 2015.
The draft law submitted to the Parliament will, if adopted, start an uncontrollable, full of abuse process of mass registration of regional chambers as new legal entities. It creates the grounds for cloning such organizations: countless pseudoadvocates' organizations will be created in the regions. And this is just one of the many risks that are inherent in the text of the draft law.
Badly thought-through provisions of the draft law 9055 in part of the bar self-government can become a grave mistake for the entire reform of the bar. Indeed, without strong, self-sufficient and stable self-government the advocates' rights will remain declarative. The institution, capable of defending each and every individual, would simply become non-existent.
A significant disadvantage of the draft law 9055 is that there are many corruption risks. The draft law 9055 is full of contradictions between different articles, terminological uncertainties, value judgments, especially in terms of regulating access to the practice and holding advocates disciplinarily liable and the allocation of legal fees. We are convinced that such things are unacceptable, because the anti-corruption component should be mandatory for each stage of the judicial reform.
The committed position of the UNBA is that the draft law 9055 needs to be assessed by the Venice Commission. Supporting the need for transparent and professional reform of the bar, the UNBA stands against the manipulation of European assessments and the clandestine attempts to return the bar under the control of the government.
The UNBA has prepared an alternative draft law based on the proposals that were presented by the bar communities all over Ukraine. The basis of the UNBA's draft law contains real problematique of the practice of law, the practical needs of advocates and the experience in the development of bar self-government, the practices of the ECHR, the key international documents on the organization of the bar institution.
Popular news

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

Advocacy
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…