Advocacy is an institutional guarantee of human rights, not a target for attacks - V. Gvozdiy
Attempts to discredit the bar through manipulation, distortion of facts and deliberately unfounded accusations, especially in times of war, are direct information support for those interested in destabilizing the legal system of Ukraine.
This was emphasized by Valentyn Gvozdiy, the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU in his article «Whose Face in the Mirror» for Ukrainian Pravda. The material was a response to the public accusations of the DEJURE Foundation against the UNBA leadership regarding the persecution of critics, support for repressive laws during the Revolution of Dignity, and inaction against collaborating lawyers.
«By presenting another set of claims against the Ukrainian National Bar Association, the authors demonstrate an approach that is already familiar from their other publications on UP: selective interpretation of events and ignoring the context, which inevitably leads to a distortion of reality, - V. Gvozdiy notes. - The purpose of such actions, unfortunately, is not so much to promote reforms as to discredit the institution of bar self-government as such».
The Vice President of the UNBA, BCU analyzes each of the charges based on logic and facts. In particular, V. Gvozdiy noted that the UNBA's main priority has always been to protect the ability of lawyers to fulfill their professional duties and provide legal assistance to those who needed it, regardless of the political context. The further development of bar self-government institutions and their active position in the protection of human rights, including after 2014, demonstrate a true commitment to democratic values much more convincingly than accusations taken out of context.
«The state of the legal system directly depends on the existence of a strong, independent and self-governing bar. The Bar is an institutional guarantee of human rights, not a convenient target for public attacks. Attempts to discredit it through manipulation, distortion of facts and deliberately unfounded accusations, especially in times of war, are direct information support for those interested in destabilizing the legal system of Ukraine», - V. Gvozdiy writes.
He is convinced that the right to public opinion does not exempt from the obligation to act in good faith, impartially and professionally. The blatant construction of the image of an «internal enemy» out of the bar has nothing to do with reforms, human rights activities, or the development of a democratic state based on the rule of law.
The full article can be found here.
Popular news
Self-government
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding advocacy are unconstitutional interference
The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the advocacy proposed by the National Agency for Corruption Prevention as direct, gross, and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.
Self-government
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published
In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.
URAU
Access to advocate contacts in URAU has been restored
The Bar Council of Ukraine has opened up public access to data from the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, which was closed at the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. The decision was made at a meeting on December 12–13.
Self-government
Members of the QDCB are not required to submit declarations - BCU
Bar Council of Ukraine examined the legal status of members of bar self-government bodies and found that they are not required to submit declarations of persons authorized to perform functions of state or local self-government.
Self-government
BCU has identified 12 areas for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
During its meeting on December 12, the Bar Council of Ukraine considered the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, approved by Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 475-r dated May 14, 2025. The document provides for the development and adoption of a draft law on improving the legal regulation of advocacy by the fourth quarter of 2026.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The Ombudsman acknowledged the problem of violation of the human right to legal aid in the TCC
The Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for human rights Dmytro Lubinets confirmed the existence of a problem with ensuring the constitutional right to professional legal assistance in territorial recruitment and social support centers.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The agreement on the provision of legal assistance is not public – BCU
Bar Council of Ukraine in its decision No. 111 dated October 18, 2025, responded to questions regarding the possibility of concluding legal assistance agreements by accepting a public offer, using an electronic form of the agreement, and posting information about legal assistance on websites.
Discussion
Why preventive measures have turned into preventive punishment in Ukraine: round table discussion
The European approach, enshrined in the CPC, provides for detention as an exceptional preventive measure: courts must prove the impossibility of milder alternatives and carefully assess the risks. In practice, however, it is increasingly being applied almost automatically, eroding standards of freedom.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences