UNBA declares discriminatory changes to the procedure for selecting advocates for FLA
The government Committee chaired by Vice-Prime-Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration Taras Kachka rejected the advocacy's comments; the UNBA emphasizes the violation of European standards and is preparing a judicial appeal if the resolution is adopted.
On September 16, 2025, a meeting of the government Committee chaired by Vice-Prime-Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic integration Taras Kachka was held to consider amendments to the procedure and conditions for the competition for the selection of advocates to provide free secondary legal aid.
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, representing the position of the legal community, put forward a number of arguments against the introduction of a discriminatory rule prohibiting advocates from participating in the competition for three years if they are removed from the Register. The UNBA emphasized that such a provision contradicts the Law of Ukraine «On the advocacy and the practice of law» and European standards enshrined in the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.
At the same time, despite the well-founded position of advocacy, the government Committee recommended that the Cabinet of Ministers adopt a resolution containing provisions that the Ukrainian National Bar Association considers discriminatory.
The UNBA claims that the Ministry of Justice has violated European standards in the area of proper involvement of advocacy in the preparation of acts directly related to the practice of law. If the Cabinet of Ministers adopts the resolution in its current form, the UNBA will be forced to challenge it in court.
In addition, the Ukrainian National Bar Association emphasizes that the system of free legal aid is in crisis and needs comprehensive reform. The UNBA's specialized Committee on FLA is preparing another report on the functioning of the system, which will be heard at the next meeting of the BCU.
Popular news
Legislation
Penalties for errors in military registration require clear rules, – UNBA
The liability of officials for violations of military registration rules must be legally defined, proportionate, and effectively enforceable. Otherwise, the new fines will not protect citizens from registration errors but will create additional risks.
European integration
Lidiya Izovitova: In the context of European integration reforms, advocacy is a partner of the state, not a target of reform
The war has significantly altered the working conditions for advocates, while European integration has presented the profession with new institutional challenges. The ongoing negotiation process covers issues such as the rule of law, judicial independence, fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The Verkhovna Rada discussed the next steps for ratifying the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a working meeting to prepare for the ratification of the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. The meeting was attended by members of parliament, representatives of the Office of the President, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Valentin Gvozdiy: Ukraine’s ratification of the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer – is a matter…
Exactly one year ago, on May 13, 2025, in Luxembourg, during the 134th session of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer was opened for signature. Today, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a working meeting to prepare for its ratification. Between these two dates lies a year, during which (on March 9) Ukraine became the 28th signatory state. We spoke about this new phase with the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU Valentin Gvozdiy, who was personally involved in the preparation of this international instrument.
Support
Mental health, archives and cybersecurity: The UNBA and the IBA reviewed the progress of joint projects
The Ukrainian National Bar Association and the International Bar Association (IBA) reviewed the progress of joint projects that are of practical importance in the context of the war: supporting the mental health of advocates, digitizing archives, and strengthening the cybersecurity of the legal infrastructure.
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA is developing a model for reforming the legal profession
The reform of the advocacy profession is part of the negotiation process regarding Ukraine’s accession to the European Union, and the Rule of Law Roadmap explicitly identifies the Ukrainian National Bar Association as one of the key stakeholders in the process.
Legal defence of military personnel
Missing in action: advocates explain the procedure to the families of servicemembers
As part of the «Advocate+» pilot project, advocates continue to work with military personnel in the brigades, helping to resolve practical legal issues — ranging from social benefits and payments to undergoing medical examinations and processing paperwork.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Police to investigate the NACP's attempts to reform advocacy
The Office of the Prosecutor General has opened a criminal investigation into alleged abuse of power by employees of the National Agency for Corruption Prevention.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates