Violation of media guarantees of advocacy is being studied by the UNBA
An open appeal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Information Policy and Interaction with the Mass Media to the advocates.
By defending or representing clients in high-profile cases, Ukrainian attorneys-at-law attract additional media attention to their personalities.
At the same time, journalists, when covering the circumstances of such cases and the work of the attorney, unfortunately, do not always adhere to professional standards: balance of opinions, reliability, separation of facts from comments, accuracy and completeness.
There are quite common cases when information about the activities of a defense counsel is presented in a biased manner, using false, unverified or inaccurate data, without clarifying the point of view of the lawyer mentioned in the material. Emotional coloring and distortion of the work of providing legal aid, which is provided for by the Constitution of Ukraine and the procedural codes, has become almost the norm today.
At the same time, the guarantees of the practice of law are directly violated. Due to the disregard for the presumption of innocence, when defendants are called criminals before the verdict and lawyers are called defenders of criminals, lawyers are actually identified with clients, which is expressly prohibited by the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law».
As a result, the public has a negative attitude towards both a particular defense lawyer (which affects the person's business reputation) and the institution of the Bar as a whole.
The protection of advocates from external information influence is one of the tasks of the UNBA Committee on Information Policy and Media Relations.
Therefore, the Committee asks lawyers who have faced violations of guarantees of their activities by the media and individual journalists to provide information about such facts to o.shevchuk@mail.unba.org.ua or fill out the appropriate Google form.
Since it is also a matter of disregard for journalistic standards and the provisions of the Law of Ukraine «On Media», the collected information on specific facts will be sent to the state media regulator to find ways to resolve this problematic issue.
Chairman of the UNBA Committee
on Information Policy
and Media Relations O. Shevchuk
04.03.2024
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
Discussion
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks
The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Discussion
AI in advocacy and justice: ethics, regulation, limits of application
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a roundtable discussion entitled «Artificial Intelligence in the цork of advocates: ethics, responsibility, legal process engineering». Participants discussed how artificial intelligence systems are already being used in the professional activities of advocates and where the ethical boundaries of what is permissible lie.
European integration
The Roadmap does not provide for the dismantling of the current model of advocacy — report
The Roadmap on the rule of law is not a law, directive, or other binding regulatory act and, accordingly, does not establish direct legal obligations regarding a specific institutional model of bar self-government.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
