Students received awards for their projects on a security agreement for Ukraine
The Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted an awards ceremony for the winners of the All-Ukrainian competition for student law-making initiatives «New Ukraine: a security treaty through the eyes of young advocates».
The competition focused on developing student proposals for an international legal treaty for Ukraine following the end of the war. It was organized by the Legal Information Center, professional development and expert research at the V. Hetman Kyiv National Economic University Law Institute in collaboration with the UNBA NextGen.
First place went to Anzhelika Ivanitska, a student at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Her work was recognized for its high level of legal technique, structure, and doctrinal depth. Second place went to a representative of the same university, Iryna Yevdchenko, for her innovative conceptual architecture, particularly the idea of a digital embassy and the 24/72 algorithm. Third place was awarded to Anna Korniyash from the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. A special prize from the organizers was awarded to Yevgen Zhurakovsky, a student at the Ivano-Frankivsk Institute «Odessa Law Academy», for an original law-making idea, specifically the mechanism of an incomplete session and the approach to the succession of obligations.
The winners received cash prizes ranging from 50,000 to 200,000 UAH. The prize fund was provided by the law firms Barristers and DGRAVITY LEGAL.
During the ceremony, Oleksiy Shevchuk, chairman of the Legal Information Center at the V. Hetman KNEU, emphasized that this is the first time such an initiative has been held in Ukraine, and its participants have effectively become pioneers in a new format for engaging students in law-making work in the fields of national security and international law.
According to him, it is important that talented young people do not seek opportunities for professional development solely abroad, but can realize their potential in Ukraine. That is why the organizers plan to make the competition an annual event.
The winners’ works will not remain merely competition projects. In the future, they plan to present them in diplomatic circles, in particular with the participation of representatives of the Council of Europe, as well as to present them at the level of state institutions involved in issues of international responsibility for crimes committed by the Russian Federation against Ukraine.
O. Shevchuk also drew the students’ attention to the practical significance of participating in the competition. According to him, winning the all-Ukrainian competition on drafting a security treaty could become an important element of young lawyers’ professional portfolios and a first step toward working in international legal institutions.
The winners thanked the organizers for the opportunity to present their own ideas. In particular, A. Ivanitskaya noted that, while studying legislative activities and regulatory drafting, she had been looking for an opportunity to prove herself in precisely this format.
Y. Zhurakovsky explained that while drafting the treaty, he sought to draw upon mechanisms of international law that existed even before World War II and to assess how they might function in contemporary conditions.
Concluding the ceremony, the organizers encouraged students not to stop at the competition entry, but to continue writing, speaking, participating in professional initiatives, and using such opportunities for further development in the legal profession.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ombudsman calls for a firm response to violence against advocates
Every instance of obstruction of an advocate’s lawful activities, use of physical force, delaying an investigation, or concealment of evidence must be subject to a proper legal assessment. The state is obligated to ensure that the right to a defense is a genuine guarantee.
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Discussion
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture
To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Court practice
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026
During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates