Lawyers are the only party to the trial that is not booked, – MP
It seems that the Verkhovna Rada understands the need to book lawyers who are part of the justice system. But how do we define the mechanism and what should the criteria be? Some MPs already have the answers to these questions and have implemented them in the form of a draft law.
On December 17, the Ukrainian National Bar Association, on the initiative of the Committee for the Protection of Advocates' Rights and Guarantees of Legal Practice, organized and held an All-Ukrainian meeting on improving the mechanisms of professional rights and guarantees of legal practice.
One of the most pressing issues, according to the UNBA Committee's Chairman Yevgeniy Solodko, is the problem of booking attorneys. The participants of the event paid special attention to its discussion.
«We are not law enforcement officers, not employees of critical infrastructure, but we ensure the realization of the constitutional right to defense, - explained Y. Solodko. According to him, it is not uncommon for lawyers to be sent to serve in the Armed Forces in the middle of complex criminal trials. «This is our duty and no one objects to its fulfillment. But this approach is not very useful for the state, because the processes start from the very beginning... There are many episodes, multi-volume cases, especially when it comes to economic crimes, and again, the courts must work from the beginning, - said the Committee Chairman. - Therefore, this issue needs to be regulated at the legislative level».
Serhiy Alekseev, Head of the Subcommittee on Law Enforcement of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Law Enforcement, confirmed that lawyers are currently the only party to the trial that is not booked. «The prosecution is booked, the courts are booked, but the lawyers are not. This issue has not been resolved», - he noted.
According to the MP, this problem is not only about booking. «It is about the implementation of Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, it is about access to justice, it is about the protection of constitutional rights of citizens in court and much more, - said S. Alekseev. He believes that this cannot be resolved at the level of a bylaw, because Article 20 of the Law on Mobilization Preparation and Mobilization contains an exhaustive list of persons subject to reservation from mobilization. And lawyers are not mentioned in this list. Therefore, the only way to reserve lawyers is to amend this article.
He recalled that in 2023, two draft laws on the reservation of lawyers from mobilization were registered (No. 9631 and No. 9631-1). However, they were not considered in the session hall and there were certain remarks to them by the Parliament's scientific department.
«There is a question: whether to regulate the procedure for booking lawyers, or simply to include them in the list, and regulate them at the level of bylaws, which can be a resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers or an order of the Ministry of Defense, - suggests S. Alekseev. - Both (we consulted with colleagues) should contain certain quotas in regional bar associations. And the bar associations should submit lists of lawyers to the UNBA according to certain criteria. In turn, the UNBA applies to the competent authorities, the Ministry of Defense, and they make the appropriate decision». Among the criteria for booking lawyers, the MP named the presence of a lawyer in the UNBA, a valid certificate, the absence of disciplinary sanctions, the lawyer's real workload, participation in the free legal aid system or providing defense to the military.
To develop the provisions of the relevant draft law, S. Alekseev believes it is necessary to involve the UNBA. «Of course, it is impossible to book all the lawyers, but a certain percentage and certain criteria should be developed, - he said. - We will provide you with the comments made by our research department in order to draw certain conclusions and submit the draft law that will be supported by the hall... And I want to emphasize once again that a lawyer is the only participant in the trial who is discredited in terms of booking from mobilization».
Yulia Yatsyk, Head of the Subcommittee on Criminal Procedural Legislation and Operational and Investigative Activities of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Law Enforcement, noted that during the consideration of the draft law on strengthening mobilization measures, several MPs submitted amendments to grant lawyers a deferral from mobilization. However, they did not receive support in the hall. «And we understand why, - she said. - Because at that time the General Staff and the Minister of Defense were very active in minimizing all deferrals from mobilization and reducing them to zero».
The MP spoke about dozens of appeals from lawyers who complained about the actions of the TCC employees who, upon a call from an investigator or prosecutor, came during investigative actions and served lawyers with summonses.
Y. Yatsyk noted that an inter-factional association to protect the rights of servicemen will be created in the Verkhovna Rada, which will also address the issues of lawyers. «And for this we need facts, we need statistics, we need specific appeals so that we can substantiate our draft law», - she summarized.
In this regard, Y. Solodko explained that the UNBA has repeatedly appealed to both the General Staff and the Ministry of Defense with specific proposals to postpone the reservation, but to no avail. «We couldn't even start a dialog, - said the UNBA Committee's Chairman. - Because there is a perception that lawyers are hindering mobilization. We will request statistics from the regions, including a breakdown by region, so that you can operate with facts and, of course, be convincing in your work directly in the Verkhovna Rada», - the lawyer promised.
MP Yevhen Petrunyak also confirmed that they had submitted amendments to the draft law on amendments to the Law «On mobilization training and mobilization», but the amendments were not supported.
«Today, my team has developed a draft law, which I will ask the entire legal community represented in the Verkhovna Rada, as well as other MPs, to sign. This bill will provide for a deferral for lawyers. And here I will apply the approach that lawyers who will be eligible for a deferral must meet certain criteria, - he announced the initiative. - These are at least 10 years of experience, no disciplinary offenses, no disciplinary proceedings against lawyers, no arrears in the payment of lawyer fees. These are the basic criteria that a lawyer must meet in order to be deferred from the draft».
The legislator noted another very important issue, in his opinion. «Today, there is a distortion in human rights activities, when government agencies are fully represented in any litigation - both criminal and any other. At the same time, citizens and legal entities may lose their legal support in courts due to the mobilization of lawyers. And not only in courts, but also during representation in other state bodies. This violates the constitutional principle of the right to defense. There is a draft law, it has been developed. And if there are any comments from the UNBA, we will gladly listen to them. We have addressed the UNBA and based on their response we have developed this draft law».
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
Discussion
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks
The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Discussion
AI in advocacy and justice: ethics, regulation, limits of application
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a roundtable discussion entitled «Artificial Intelligence in the цork of advocates: ethics, responsibility, legal process engineering». Participants discussed how artificial intelligence systems are already being used in the professional activities of advocates and where the ethical boundaries of what is permissible lie.
European integration
The Roadmap does not provide for the dismantling of the current model of advocacy — report
The Roadmap on the rule of law is not a law, directive, or other binding regulatory act and, accordingly, does not establish direct legal obligations regarding a specific institutional model of bar self-government.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates