Those who equate advocates with clients will be fined – law passed
Public identification of an advocate with a client to whom such advocate provides professional legal assistance will become an administrative offense, and forms of interference in the activities of an advocate, for which liability is provided for in Article 397 of the Criminal Code, are detailed.
Today, July 16, the Verkhovna Rada adopted the Law «On amendments to the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses and the Criminal Code of Ukraine to ensure compliance with guarantees of advocacy».
The Ukrainian National Bar Association welcomes this decision of the parliament, as it allows for the formation of a clear mechanism for responding to violations of the rights of advocates and guarantees of their activities, in particular, cases of pressure, public discrediting, and identification with clients, which contradicts the principle of independence of the advocacy profession.
Lidiya Izovitova, the President of the UNBA, BCU, expressed her special gratitude to the authors of Draft Law No. 12320 - Grigory Mamka, Vyacheslav Medianyk, Maksym Buzhansky, Serhiy Ionushas, Serhiy Mink, Volodymyr Zakharchenko, the leadership and members of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on law enforcement and the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy, as well as all members of parliament who supported the legislative initiative.
«The adopted law is a concrete response to the systemic problem of identifying advocates with their clients and the lack of effective protection against interference in the practice of law. This is an important step towards ensuring that advocates can work without pressure and with respect for their professional status, as required by the Constitution of Ukraine and international standards», - said L. Izovitova.
According to the Law, a separate Article 185-16, «Violation of the prohibition on identifying a lawyer with a client» will be added to the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses:
«1. Public, including through the media, journalists, public associations, professional unions, digital platforms, social networks, identifying a lawyer with a client to whom such lawyer provides professional legal assistance, committed without the intent to obstruct the lawyer's performance of his or her statutory powers to defend, represent, and provide other types of legal assistance to the client, -
shall entail the imposition of a fine on citizens of between two hundred and three hundred non-taxable minimum incomes and on officials of between three hundred and four hundred non-taxable minimum incomes.
2. An act provided for in part one of this article, committed by a person who has been subject to administrative penalties for the same violation within a year, -
shall entail the imposition of a fine of six hundred to eight hundred non-taxable minimum incomes.
The article will also contain a note explaining the meaning of the term «identification of an advocate with a client» – any identification (association, linking) of an advocate with a client, with the activities or actions of his client, which creates a biased attitude towards the advocate, indicates the personal involvement of the advocate in the client's case, affects the independent status of the advocate and/or exerts negative pressure during the performance of advocacy activities, and/or violates the guarantees of advocacy activities, and/or impedes the exercise of the rights of the advocate provided for by the Law of Ukraine «On advocacy and advocacy activities».
Cases involving such administrative offenses will be considered by judges of district, city, or city district courts. Protocols will be drawn up by the chairmen of regional bar councils or a member of the bar council authorized by the BCU.
In addition, the Law amends Article 397 (Interference in the activities of an advocate) of the Criminal Code.
Today, criminal liability is established for «any form of obstruction of the lawful activities of a defender or representative of a person in providing legal assistance or violation of the guarantees established by law for their activities and professional secrecy».
According to the law, these forms will be detailed: «illegal obstruction of the arrival of an advocate to a court, prosecution authorities, pre-trial investigation authorities, enterprises, institutions, organizations, regardless of their form of ownership, to their separate premises for the purpose of representing the interests of a person to whom such advocate provides legal assistance, illegal obstruction of a meeting between an advocate and a person to whom legal assistance is provided, as well as any other intentional obstruction of the professional activities of an advocate and the exercise of his or her powers, as defined by laws or other normative legal acts on the protection or representation of persons».
Some members of the public interpret the law as increasing pressure on the media. At the same time, the legal community emphasizes that the provision does not restrict freedom of expression and does not prevent public discussion of the activities of lawyers or their clients. It is aimed solely at protecting against unlawful personalisation — when an advocate is deliberately identified with the position or actions of a client, leading to discrediting, pressure or interference with the independence of the advocacy profession. This is not about prohibiting criticism, but about introducing clear boundaries that comply with both the Constitution of Ukraine and international standards. The establishment of such limits in law ensures an appropriate balance between the right of society to information and the right of lawyers to professional impartiality and protection from prejudice. At the same time, the new mechanism of accountability will not operate automatically — each violation must be recorded and proven in accordance with the established procedural order.
«This is, without exaggeration, one of the most significant achievements of the advocacy community in recent years in the field of professional guarantees. For the first time, real mechanisms have been introduced at the legislative level to hold accountable those who violate the prohibition on identifying a lawyer with their client. This not only strengthens the position of advocates in complex proceedings, but also increases trust in the legal system as a whole. Every advocate will be able to refer not only to the relevant article of the law, but also to the direct provision of the Code of Administrative Offenses and the Criminal Code, which has a preventive and protective nature, - said Valentin Gvozdiy, the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU. - Therefore, I am grateful to everyone who was involved in the preparation of the bill, its submission and support in the Verkhovna Rada, as well as those who voted for it in the session hall».
Popular news
Announcements
Internships at German law firms: IRZ is accepting applications from Ukrainians
In 2026, the German Foundation for International Legal Cooperation (IRZ) plans to organize a multilateral internship program for young advocates from partner countries. Participants will attend an introductory seminar in Bonn and complete internships at law firms in Germany.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Restrictions on the right to legal assistance in pretrial detention centers are unacceptable – statement by the BCU
The Bar Council of Ukraine has stated that it is unacceptable to restrict the right to professional legal assistance, the guarantees of legal practice, and the confidentiality of communications between advocates and clients in pretrial detention facilities operated by the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine.
European integration
The UNBA presented the CCBE with an overview of legal reform and challenges
Reform of the legal profession, Ukraine’s European integration commitments, guarantees of the profession’s independence, and practices of bar self-governance in European countries — these issues were the subject of discussion at the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA is compiling the findings of the subgroups regarding the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap
Today, May 28, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the Coordination Bureau of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding the reform of the advocacy profession. Following a series of meetings by thematic subgroups, the work is now moving to the stage of consolidating proposals and preparing a coordinated package of recommendations.
Discussion
UNBA discussed removing barriers at border crossings for families with children with disabilities
Families of children with disabilities face additional requirements when traveling abroad, particularly regarding consular registration. What is happening and what changes are needed to remove these obstacles were discussed during the roundtable «Borders without barriers for families of children with disabilities».
Discussion
New rules, old problems: the UNBA discussed the work of the ETAIDF and MMC
The reform of medical-social assessment and military medical commissions has changed procedures but has not resolved practical issues. People face situations where documents are not issued, decisions are based on technicalities, assessments are delayed, and they struggle to demonstrate their actual health status in specific life situations.
Discussion
Co-parenting shouldn't be reduced to a 50/50 formula, — roundtable discussion
Following a divorce, joint custody can serve as a mechanism for ensuring equal parental rights. However, this model requires clear criteria and cannot be applied automatically without taking into account the child’s age, the level of conflict between the parents, the risk of violence, and the feasibility of enforcing the future decision.
Legislation
Penalties for errors in military registration require clear rules, – UNBA
The liability of officials for violations of military registration rules must be legally defined, proportionate, and effectively enforceable. Otherwise, the new fines will not protect citizens from registration errors but will create additional risks.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates