Urban Planning Code: what should the new rules for rebuilding Ukraine be?
Does Ukraine need separate codification in the field of urban planning, which model of law to choose, and how to ensure a balance between the interests of the state, communities, businesses, and citizens in the context of post-war reconstruction?
Participants sought answers to these questions at the latest roundtable discussion «Concept of the Future Urban Development Code of Ukraine», organized and conducted by the UNBA Committee on construction law.
Deputy chairman of the Committee Tetiana Batyus emphasized that currently, relations in the field of construction are regulated by a large number of laws and subordinate acts, which creates chaos, conflicts, and corruption risks. In her opinion, the new code, as a strategic document of the state, should systematize norms, establish a human-centered approach, ensure transparent and digitized procedures, real responsibility for violations, and take into account the European vector of development and the needs of rebuilding destroyed territories.
The view of the educational and scientific community was presented by the head of the Department of law and public administration at the Kyiv National University of construction and architecture Volodymyr Nikitin. He supported the idea of adopting a single codified act and pointed out that the lack of a unified approach complicates both law enforcement and the training of specialists in the field of construction and spatial planning, especially given the focus of educational programs on post-war reconstruction.
Chairman of the Subcommittee on urban planning, improvement and land relations within building territories of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on organization of state power, local self-government, regional development and urban planning Hanna Bondar presented the concept of the future act, which is being developed by a large interdisciplinary working group with the participation of representatives of local self-government bodies, specialized associations, ministries, and experts in urban planning, ecology, and heritage protection.
According to her, after lengthy discussions, a working title «Code of spatial planning and development of territories» was formed, which should reflect both the spatial planning and construction blocks. The concept covers not only traditional urban planning procedures (planning, design, construction, operation, and demolition of facilities), but also related areas such as ecology, cultural heritage protection, civil protection, economic mechanisms, insurance, and investment protection. The concept is currently being refined, taking into account hundreds of comments received.
Committee member of the UNBA Inna Yaremova focused on the compliance of the future code with Ukraine's international obligations. She noted that the document must be consistent with the Association Agreement with the EU, the Aarhus Convention, European charters on local self-government, landscape and architectural heritage, and the practice of the ECHR regarding property rights, housing, a favorable environment, and effective legal protection. In her opinion, particular attention should be paid to the real participation of the public in decision-making, environmental assessment, and guarantees of judicial control over administrative procedures in the field of construction.
She also warned against excessive centralization of powers and drew attention to the insufficient reflection in the concept of the principle of «right to the city» enshrined in the Council of Europe charter on democratic governance.
The chairman of the UNBA Committee on construction law Oleg Povaliayev stressed that the legal community should take an active part in shaping the legal basis of the future code. He recalled that, following the previous round table, the Committee had already sent a resolution to the Verkhovna Rada, and also emphasized the importance of continuing the dialogue with parliament. Concluding the event, O. Povaliayev thanked the participants for the discussion and invited experts to join the Committee's further work, as well as to cooperate between the UNBA and the Kyiv National University of construction and architecture.
Popular news
Legislation
The path to ratification of the Convention must not end in yet another delay — L. Izovitova
Ukraine’s preparations for the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer have already passed key stages. Now, government institutions must submit the matter to the Verkhovna Rada for consideration. In doing so, Ukraine may complete the ratification process faster than EU member states.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine could be the first to implement a European mechanism for the protection of advocates. What’s holding it back?
Ukraine has a chance to be the first country to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. Political support for this exists, but the government’s legislative package has not yet been submitted to parliament. Meanwhile, the number of violations of advocates’ rights is on the rise.
Educational events
How can an advocate verify that work has been completed if the client refuses to sign the report?
When billing by the hour, the primary document for determining the fee may be a detailed report on the time spent by the advocate and the work performed. To prevent the client from withholding payment, the contract should specify in advance the procedure for submitting and approving such a report.
Self-government
The BCU took note of the public appeal from the HCJ
The Bar Council of Ukraine has determined that, given the current security situation, it is objectively impossible to hold, in accordance with the procedure established by the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law», meetings of advocates, regional conferences of advocates and the Congress of Ukrainian Advocates, including for the purpose of electing two members of the High Council of Justice under the quota allocated to the Congress of Ukrainian Advocates.
War
The BCU has launched a digital project «Wall of Remembrance and Honor»
The Bar Council of Ukraine has adopted a resolution to launch the digital project «Wall of Remembrance and Honor». To this end, the UNBA is beginning to collect information on advocates and paralegals who lost their lives as a result of the Russian Federation’s armed aggression against Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
«Advocate+» has expanded its operations to 18 military units
The «Advocate+» project of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, which assigns advocates to military units, has expanded its operations to 18 units. Specialists have already been assigned to the new participants and are set to begin consultations next week.
Appointment
The UNBA has established a Committee on cybersecurity and virtual assets
A permanent collegial advisory body — the Committee on cybersecurity and virtual assets has been established under the UNBA.
Legal defence of military personnel
Medical care, veterans' benefits and legal assistance: what changes are needed to protect service members
The consequences of torture and illnesses suffered by Ukrainian servicemembers while in captivity are not always properly documented or taken into account when providing social benefits. Therefore, a medical examination is crucial during the reintegration phase; it is also necessary for documenting war crimes.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates