The Verkhovna Rada Committee criticized the format of the government working group on advocacy

Legislation
17:48 Fri 20.02.26 315 Reviews
Print

The implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law (approved by Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 475-r of May 14, 2025) in relation to advocacy raises the practical question of who exactly should prepare legislative changes and how.

At the last meeting of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy, which took place on February 19, MPs raised questions about the composition and format of the government working group on improving legislation in the field of advocacy and legal practice, established by Resolution No. 42 of January 12, 2026.

Deputy Chairman of the Committee Valery Bozyk recalled that this group was formed as an advisory body, which included representatives of the Ministry of Justice, MPs, partner organizations, and other stakeholders. In this regard, the MP requested that the purpose and responsibility for preparing the draft law be clear at the start of the process.

V. Bozyk asked the Ministry of Justice to coordinate its work with parliament in advance in order to avoid situations where issues remain unresolved for months and then the Committee is asked to support a draft document «the day after tomorrow» with reference to obligations to Europe. He stressed that he does not object to the involvement of a wide range of stakeholders and public organizations, but asks that this not replace interaction with MPs as future voting entities.

The chairman of the subcommittee on the organization and activities of the advocacy and legal aid bodies Volodymyr Vatras supported his colleague's logic, while shifting the focus to the composition of the working group.

He explained that the Ukrainian National Bar Association, which, like the parliament and the Cabinet of Ministers represented by the Ministry of Justice, is responsible for implementing the Roadmap, is not represented in this group. In this regard, the MP recalled that only Oksana Kadenko, a representative of the Bar Council from the Khmelnytskyi region, was included in the group, while a number of public organizations were involved in the work. Vatras saw this as a risk to the reform. «Once again, we are starting a conversation about wanting to reform the advocacy without involving the advocacy in this reform», - he explained his position and appealed to the leadership of the Ministry of Justice to reformat the composition of the working group.

The head of the relevant subcommittee reported that on February 17, he prepared and submitted a deputy's appeal to the Prime Minister of Ukraine, Yulia Svyrydenko, regarding the need for proportional representation in this working group of the parliament, the government, and the UNBA. According to V. Vatras, there should be «at least nine people» from each side, and he also voiced the idea of three co-chairs of the working group: from parliament, from the UNBA, and from the Ministry of Justice.

Separately, he named additional candidates for the group who, according to him, were not included (People's Deputies Ivan Kalaura and Pavlo Pavlish).

Among other things, V. Vatras raised the issue of the methodology of the Ministry of Justice's work with the roadmap for reforming the Law «On advocacy and legal practice». According to him, the participants received a letter with a proposal to submit ideas and suggestions, but without a draft act to which these proposals could be formulated. He asked the Ministry of Justice to first develop a draft and only then collect proposals, and also called for a decision on the format of future regulation: whether it would be a new law or a law amending and supplementing the existing one.

The MP also linked the discussion to the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. He recalled that on February 18, the President signed a decree authorizing Mykola Tochitsky to sign an international treaty, and asked the Ministry of Justice what specific steps had already been taken to sign and subsequently ratify the document, given that the head of state had designated an authorized person.

In response, Deputy Minister of Justice Lyudmila Kravchenko stated that her ministry had initiated the signing and that it was the Ministry of Justice that had begun the procedure for authorizing the person to sign (although earlier the agency saw obstacles to this in the need to amend the legislation on advocacy and in the implementation of the Roadmap). L. Kravchenko also linked further information for MPs to the first meeting of the working group after the collection of proposals. According to the official, at the first meeting, the Ministry of Justice will present the steps it plans to take and promised to improve the working mechanism so that the group becomes more focused on the legal community.

The chairman of the subcommittee on political reform and constitutional law Maksym Dyrdin also took an interest in the launch of the working group. He mentioned a letter sent to parliament requesting proposals on the ideas outlined in the letter and asked why the Ministry of Justice did not first gather all the members of the working group, discuss the direction to take, what exactly needed to be changed and in what context, and only then collect proposals. «It turns out that the Ministry of Justice has already determined in advance the points that interest it most», - he explained. In response, L. Kravchenko explained that there are different ways of working and that the Ministry of Justice chose to collect proposals first so that the first meeting of the working group would be substantive.

Popular news

BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession

Self-government

BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession

The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.

14:56 Thu 02.04.26 101
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Interaction

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.

9:59 Fri 27.03.26 153
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

Rule of Law Roadmap

Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.

16:42 Mon 23.03.26 180
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Rule of Law Roadmap

Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.

15:26 Fri 20.03.26 184
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

Discussion

ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».

13:58 Thu 19.03.26 143
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

Rule of Law Roadmap

Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.

18:14 Wed 18.03.26 132
A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo

Appointment

A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo

Advocate Irena Maria Ostrozka-Sangushko has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Arab Republic of Egypt, in the city of Cairo. The corresponding Order No. 80, dated March 10, 2026, was signed by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova.

15:42 Wed 18.03.26 113
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

Rule of Law Roadmap

Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.

18:03 Mon 16.03.26 152

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл