Organization of advocacy and self-government: the subgroup gathered proposals

European integration
15:21 Fri 06.03.26 231 Reviews
Print

On March 6, the Ukrainian National Bar Association held the first meeting of the subgroup «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in terms of reforming the advocacy sector.

The meeting was held via videoconference.

The meeting was opened by the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU Valentin Gvozdiy. Given the busy schedule of the participants, he outlined the parameters of the work and emphasized the need for prompt and structured preparation of materials within the general calendar.

V. Gvozdiy outlined specific issues that are the focus of the subgroup's work (formation and activities of self-government bodies, competences, procedures, internal accountability, work standards), and explained that the work would include reviewing the provisions of the legislation on advocacy, preparing a coordinated package of changes and proposals, and ensuring that the proposed changes are in line with Ukrainian realities and European standards. The results of the work will be used to formulate proposals that strengthen the institutional capacity of advocacy without compromising its independence.

The meeting was joined by the chairman of the subcommittee on the organization and activities of the advocacy and legal aid bodies of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy Volodymyr Vatras. He drew attention to the need to structure the work of the subgroup so that its findings are ready for further consideration in parliament.

Other participants in the meeting shared their views on which elements of the model for the organization of advocacy and self-government need to be updated and what logic should be used to structure further work so that the existing developments can be translated into an agreed package of changes.

As a result, it was agreed to hold meetings on a weekly basis.

V. Gvozdiy announced that the subgroup would prepare a conceptual document with specific legislative proposals that would comply with the Constitution, international standards, and Ukraine's European commitments.

As a reminder, the Roadmap on the Rule of Law was approved by Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 475-r of May 14, 2025. By Decision No. 125 of the BCU of December 12, 2025, the Program for its implementation in terms of reforming the advocacy sector was approved and a working group was created.

This week, two other subgroups of the Working Group also held meetings: «Disciplinary procedures and advocacy ethics» and «European integration, international practice and digitalization».

Popular news

Ombudsman calls for a firm response to violence against advocates

Guarantees of the practice of law

Ombudsman calls for a firm response to violence against advocates

Every instance of obstruction of an advocate’s lawful activities, use of physical force, delaying an investigation, or concealment of evidence must be subject to a proper legal assessment. The state is obligated to ensure that the right to a defense is a genuine guarantee.

16:13 Fri 17.07.26 103
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Greetings

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.

19:43 Thu 16.07.26 142
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

Legislation

The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.

14:26 Thu 09.07.26 132
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.

12:28 Fri 03.07.26 188
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

Discussion

The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.

10:27 Wed 01.07.26 125
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

Legislation

The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.

15:54 Tue 30.06.26 202
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

Interaction

A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.

16:59 Fri 26.06.26 274
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

Court practice

Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.

12:03 Mon 22.06.26 135

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл