The UNBA presented the CCBE with an overview of legal reform and challenges

European integration
14:39 Mon 01.06.26 324 Reviews
Print

Reform of the legal profession, Ukraine’s European integration commitments, guarantees of the profession’s independence, and practices of bar self-governance in European countries — these issues were the subject of discussion at the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).

Hanna Udovenko, a leading expert on European integration at the Ukrainian National Bar Association, participated in the meetings held on May 28–29 in Ljubljana (Slovenia).

During the meeting of the CCBE Committee on Central and Eastern Europe (PECO), she presented key initiatives related to European integration, the protection of the independence of the advocacy profession, and the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap, approved by Decree No. 475-r of the Cabinet of Ministers dated May 14, 2025.

Participants were briefed on the status of Ukraine’s accession to the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. The UNBA noted that the signing of the international treaty was preceded by public appeals to the President, the Government, the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as coordination of positions with the Permanent Representation of Ukraine to the EU and the Council of Europe. On May 13, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a special working meeting with the participation of the UNBA, where the draft law on ratification and the schedule for its consideration were discussed. The position of the bar association is that the ratification of the Convention and the reform of the bar under the Roadmap are parallel processes, so ratification should not be postponed until the reform is completed.

H. Udovenko also presented the results of the work of the UNBA Committee on the protection of advocates’ rights and guarantees of legal practice. Among the problematic trends cited were obstruction of legal practice by territorial recruitment and social support centers, instances of publicly equating an advocate with a client, searches without a warrant from an investigating judge, and the use of mobilization procedures as a tool to pressure advocates.

Another topic raised at the PECO meeting concerned the activities of the UNBA Working Group on the Implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap. The group has been operating since January 2026 and comprises eight thematic subgroups corresponding to the sections of the future Law «On the advocacy and practice of law»: access to the profession and digital exams, organization of self-governance, disciplinary procedures, guarantees for legal practice, transparency and financial control, European integration and digitalization, and continuing professional development for advocates. Based on the work completed, the UNBA prepared a consolidated report, which was submitted to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Enlargement and Eastern Neighborhood (DG ENEST) and forwarded to the CCBE for a structured dialogue on Cluster 1.

In addition, as early as October 2025, the Bar Council of Ukraine fulfilled the Roadmap’s requirement for harmonization with Directives 77/249/EEC and 98/5/EC ahead of schedule by adopting Resolution No. 100 on the regulation of foreign advocates’ activities in Ukraine.

There was also discussion of attempts at state interference in bar self-governance in the draft Anti-Corruption Strategy for 2026–2030. The document, prepared by the National Agency for Corruption Prevention, contains a separate section on advocacy, which provides for interference in the formation of self-governing bodies, a qualifying exam, disciplinary proceedings, and financial management. In this regard, the UNBA appealed to the CCBE with a request to support Ukrainian advocacy. Possible formats include a comparative survey of member bar associations regarding the relationship between advocacy and the state on anti-corruption issues, the preparation of a consolidated summary for dialogue with Ukrainian authorities and EU institutions within Cluster 1, as well as consideration of the possibility of a public statement by the CCBE.

Participants in the PECO meeting discussed models of bar self-governance in various countries, including the status of presidents of national associations and the conditions under which they practice law. H. Udovenko explained the Ukrainian model, under which the chairman of the UNBA may continue to practice law without legislative restrictions. The law provides for the possibility of setting a fee, but currently the chairman of the UNBA performs his duties on a pro bono basis.

The issue of annual dues paid by advocates whose right to practice law has been suspended was also discussed. According to information presented during the meeting, in most European countries, such advocates continue to pay dues — either in full or at a reduced rate. Ukraine is one of the few countries where advocates whose right to practice law has been suspended do not pay dues for the entire period of suspension.

Additionally, participants were informed about a new joint project between the UNBA and the International Bar Association (IBA) aimed at protecting attorney-client privilege and institutional digital systems in wartime conditions. The project is scheduled to last six months and includes an independent assessment of cyber risks, the development of a practical cybersecurity guide for Ukrainian advocates, a training program through the Higher School of Advocacy, and a security audit of the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine.

The CCBE plenary session addressed issues related to the organization’s activities and development, the approval of the 2025 financial statements, planning for 2027, and the implementation of CCBE priorities. Separate discussions were held on the protection of human rights and the selection of the CCBE Award winner in this field, anti-money laundering, the development of the European Platform for Information Exchange between advocacy organizations, and the CCBE’s positions on current EU legislative initiatives.

«The UNBA’s participation in the work of CCBE bodies is part of an ongoing dialogue with European partners regarding guarantees of the independence of the legal profession, the fulfillment of Ukraine’s European integration commitments, and the alignment of professional self-governance with European standards», - commented H. Udovenko on the outcomes of the meetings.

Popular news

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Greetings

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.

19:43 Thu 16.07.26 117
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

Legislation

The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.

14:26 Thu 09.07.26 116
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.

12:28 Fri 03.07.26 170
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

Discussion

The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.

10:27 Wed 01.07.26 109
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

Legislation

The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.

15:54 Tue 30.06.26 186
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

Interaction

A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.

16:59 Fri 26.06.26 257
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

Court practice

Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.

12:03 Mon 22.06.26 123
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

Court practice

Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.

18:22 Fri 19.06.26 243

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл