The Ministry of Defense has taken into account the UNBA's proposals regarding medical commissions for those released from captivity
The Ministry of Defense has included in the draft amendments to the procedure for military medical examinations certain proposals from the Ukrainian National Bar Association aimed at simplifying the process of confirming the circumstances of health impairments sustained during captivity and establishing a causal link to the defense of the homeland.
The Ministry of Defense’s Department of Health informed the UNBA of this.
These changes pertain to the Regulations on Military Medical Examination in the Armed Forces of Ukraine, approved by Ministry of Defense Order No. 402 dated August 14, 2008. Proposals to improve this regulatory act were prepared by the UNBA Committee on the protection of victims of armed aggression against Ukraine, compensation mechanisms and European integration legal support for recovery.
An analysis of cases involving individuals released from captivity who were represented by advocates— members of the Committee — revealed that the current Regulations formally allow for linking illnesses to detention, but do not establish a specific evidentiary procedure for this category of individuals. In practice, the Medical Examination Commission (MEC) refuses to establish a causal link, citing the lack of medical documents issued directly during detention, even though it is objectively impossible to obtain them from the aggressor state.
Furthermore, the regulations do not specify a list of alternative evidence or a deadline for the Medical Examination Commission to issue a decision. There is no provision for the mandatory participation of a psychiatrist. There are also no safeguards against repeated denials on the same grounds after a person submits additional materials.
Overall, the UNBA has proposed a broad set of amendments to the Regulations. Specifically, it proposes establishing a 30-day deadline for the Medical Examination Commission to issue a decision in such cases, requiring the participation of a psychiatrist and a representative of the Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, and codifying the list of admissible evidence. This list should include certificates from the Coordination Headquarters and the International Committee of the Red Cross, testimony from individuals who were held in the same place of detention, materials from criminal proceedings under Article 438 of the Criminal Code, and medical documentation prepared after release.
The association also proposed that illnesses arising from or exacerbated by torture, cruel or inhuman treatment, denial of medical care, inadequate conditions of detention, or forced labor be taken into account. Documents establishing a causal link were to be issued to the individual on the day of the medical examination committee hearing.
The Ministry of Defense’s Department of Health reported that the draft partially incorporates the UNBA’s proposals regarding the regulation of the specifics of military medical examinations for individuals released from captivity. In particular, the draft eliminates the requirement to submit a Form 5 certificate detailing the circumstances of the injury.
In addition, the draft provides that the circumstances surrounding the infliction of a wound, concussion, injury, or the onset of an illness may be confirmed by other documents. Among these, the Ministry of Defense cites medical reports and certificates confirming the individual’s captivity. According to the ministry’s assessment, these changes should ensure an objective and well-founded approach to establishing a causal link between health impairments and the defense of the homeland.
According to the Department of Health, the draft order is undergoing a second round of internal review within the Ministry.
The Ministry of Defense also reported that the issues raised in the UNBA’s appeal and the proposals provided will be further taken into account when preparing subsequent amendments to regulatory acts in this area. The Ministry thanked the advocates for their professional stance and confirmed its readiness to continue cooperating with the UNBA.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ombudsman calls for a firm response to violence against advocates
Every instance of obstruction of an advocate’s lawful activities, use of physical force, delaying an investigation, or concealment of evidence must be subject to a proper legal assessment. The state is obligated to ensure that the right to a defense is a genuine guarantee.
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Discussion
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture
To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Legal defence of military personnel
Advocates are expanding their legal support for the military and affected businesses
Legal assistance for military personnel should begin with simple and quick consultations, but it should not end there. Typical requests from brigades are compiled into summaries, digital services and proposals to government agencies.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates