UNBA representatives visited Germany
During its visit to Germany, UNBA delegation held a series of expert discussions at the German Federal Bar with the aim of exchanging experience with the bar organization.
UNBA delegation included Deputy Head of the UNBA, BCU Valentyn Gvozdii, Head of the UNBA Committee on International Relations Ivan Grechkivskii, Head of the Kyiv City Bar Council Petro Ryabenko, Head of the Kyiv City QDBC Igor Orlov, members of the Kyiv City Bar Council and QDBC Diana Nazarenko, Ganna Lytvyn, Kateryna Nykytiuk, Head of Khmelnytsky Region Bar Council Natalia Vagina, Member of the UNBA Committee on International Relations Vladyslav Ryabenko, Head of the UNBA Secretariat Vadym Krasnyk and Head of the Secretariat of the HQDBC Victor Vovniuk.
The second day of the visit included a series of meetings with BRAK Vice President Johanna Aizer. Expert Discussion with BRAK Referee Jennifer Witte covered the topic of attorney's fees.
The UNBA delegation also met with the Ombudsman of the Bar Monica Niore. The Office of the Bar Ombudsman is the body that settles disputes between clients and advocates in Germany. Its decisions are advisory, but in most cases voluntarily implemented by the parties. An Ombudsman cannot be an advocate. The Ombudsman is currently a retired judge.
We would like to emphasize, that Germany provides one of the most significant among all European countries support in reforming the Ukrainian Bar. Cooperation between Ukrainian National Bar Association and the German Federal Bar was established in 2014 and is actively developing.
The UNBA foreign office in Berlin is headed by Valentyn Gvozdii.
In April 2018, Head of UNBA, BCU Lidia Izovitova, Deputy Head of UNBA, BCU Valentyn Gvozdii and Head of the UNBA Committee on International Relations Ivan Grechkivskii participated in a meeting of leaders of the Bar of Germany, Russia, Belarus and Ukraine.
The event was organized by the German Federal Bar (BRAK) to discuss topical issues in the organization of the Bar and legal regulation its activities. The agenda of the conference included such issues as organizational and legal forms of advocacy; taxation of advocacy; advocate's monopoly and its scope; Bar relations with authorities and cybersecurity and cyber law.
Popular news
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Discussion
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture
To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Court practice
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026
During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.
Court practice
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates
The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates