BCU calls the Parliament to send the draft law №1008 for the revision
Bar Council of Ukraine called people’s deputies to revise the draft law No.1008 «On making amendments to some laws of Ukraine about the practice of self-governing judicial bodies» considering the position of the legal community.
The decision of BCU to appeal to Verkhovna Rada, President of Ukraine and international organizations was made during the meeting in Odessa on September 21st.
The appeal is saying, that the draft law carries risks of the backdown from already achieved level of european standards in the ares on human rights.
«Unfortunately, nowadays we see, that an accelerated process of making changes in the legislation takes place, which carries serious challenges to the abidance of the principles of the constitutional state and threats with the decrease of already achieved level of European Council’s standards in the area of justice. Official position of EU agency in Ukraine and Embassy of Canada in Ukraine about the draft law No.1008 about self-governing judicial bodies and the draft law No.1032 on the reform of prosecution bodies, which was shared on September 11th, already signalizes about that. In particular, key international partners noted, that there are «risks, that unadvised steps into change of the current government, which regulate the activity of judiciary, advocacy, prosecution bodies question the reliability of Ukraine as a partner in key european institutions». In this document specified the need «to start a thorough advisory process of earlier mentioned draft laws and invite relevant legal experts to it, civil society and international community». Draft law No.1008 was adopted in the first reading without appropriate consultation with professional legal community. This contradicts international standards and, foremost, the Main Principles of United Nations on the role of lawyers, which provide the involvement of professional advocates organization in the development of the profile legislation»,-is written in the appeal of BCU.
BCU also insists on the appeal to Venice Commission to be required during the passage of the draft law No.1008.
You can read the whole text of the appeal here
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
Discussion
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks
The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates