UNBA called the president to exclude Mykola Onischuk from Working Group on issues of developing judicial legislation and implementation of justice

UNBA called the President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to exclude Mykola Olischuk from the Working Group on issues of developing judicial legislation and implementation of justice because of appeals concerning the reforming of advocacy.
This appeal of UNBA was directed to the Presidential Office.
It says in the document, that of October 9th 2019 during the broadcast of “Pravo TV” Mykola Onischuk announced plans of headed by him Working Group to create a new version of the law “On advocacy and legal practice” and to pass this draft law the Verkhovna Rada through the Presidential Office. With that, Mykola Onischuk made defamatory statements about the activity of Ukrainian advocacy and gave biased evaluations of UNBA’s position
«We think, that public comments of Mr. Onischuk have shown his disrespect to the municipal institute of advocacy of Ukraine, not understanding the key principles of its activity and ignorance of international standards of developing changes in the profile law. Biased evaluations of Working Group’s Head has already made a reputational damage to the institute of advocacy and defamed consultative and advisory organization, which he is a part of», - says in the appeal.
Advocates’ community emphasized, that Head of the Working Group within the Commission on the legal reformation factually testified his intentions to lobby the draft law №9055, which was brought by the fifth president Petro Poroshenko and wasn’t passed due to active resistance of the advocates’ community.
«Such public position of Mr.Onischuk shows his unprofessional biased approaches and lobbyist intentions. It is obvious, that such a position was formed by work experience of Mr. Onischuk as a member of Constitutional Commission at Presidential Office of Ukraine and his participation in the council on issues of the judicial reform, which was coordinated by the head deputy of the Administration at the Presidential Office Alexey Filatov, who secretly developed and accepted scandalous draft law №9055. All these makes it impossible for him to continue his participation in developing the reform of advocacy, which would have been made in accordance with principles of priority of rights and freedoms of humans and citizens and would have counted international obligations of Ukraine and demopcratic standards of organizing municipal institutes of advocacy», - says in the appeal.
UNBA reminded, that last attempt of reforming the advocacy in 2016-2018 through the №9055 evoked public discontent, was negatively criticized by the advocates community and was negatively evaluated not only by advocacy, but also by the most authoritive organizations of legal defense, as the one, which will limit the possibility to protect constitutional rights of citizens, Any initiatives of reanimation of this draft law will have negative effects and cannot be passed in the context of efforts being made by the new government for strengthening of judicial system in Ukraine
Counting intentions of the Ukrainian President to held a real judicial reform, as he has announced on the press-marathon on October 10th 2019, advocates’ community hopes for the reaction from the government and for the fair decision
Popular news

Guarantees of the practice of law
The process of signing the Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate was taken under control by t…
The Ministry of Justice sent the text of the translation of the Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the advocate to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs «for review and approval». The main legal authority also expressed its support for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs regarding the signing and ratification of this Convention.

Guarantees of the practice of law
Statement by the UNBA Committee on the «National Police investigation»
The media is spreading news that the National Police of Ukraine is allegedly investigating a criminal offense committed by the leadership of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.

Discussion
Without the protection of advocates, there will be no fair trials in Ukraine — forum in Odesa
Identifying an advocate with their client undermines the foundations of justice, as it deprives individuals of the opportunity to exercise their right to defense, forces advocates to avoid participating in high-profile cases, and ultimately renders procedural guarantees meaningless. Without this, fair trial is impossible.

Guarantees of the practice of law
The number of cases where advocates are identified with their clients is growing – UNBA report
Advocates are increasingly being held hostage to political processes, with them being equated with their clients. Such actions undermine the independence of the profession and create an atmosphere of intimidation, as a result of which Ukrainian citizens are deprived of their right to defense.

Legislation
What data is sufficient to initiate an investigation – UNBA comments on draft law No. 12439
The problem of law enforcement pressure on business remains one of the most acute for the Ukrainian economy. The lack of regulation of certain procedures in the Criminal Procedure Code leads to abuses, as a result of which entrepreneurs find themselves in a state of legal uncertainty.

Guarantees of the practice of law
Law on advocacy and the Council of Europe Convention: the UNBA assessed compliance (comparative table)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared and published a comparative table showing the extent to which Ukrainian legislation complies with the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate.

Guarantees of the practice of law
The Verkhovna Rada is waiting for the Minister of Justice to take action on signing the Convention on the protection of t…
Ukraine, which was directly involved in the preparation of the world's first Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate, has still not signed it. There appear to be no formal objections, but no real steps have been taken towards accession either.

Abroad
Australian advocate apologizes in court for fake AI quotes
In Australia, a royal advocate apologized to a judge for submitting documents in a criminal case against a teenager accused of murder that contained fabricated quotes and non-existent court decisions generated by artificial intelligence.
Publications

Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences