UNBA called the president to exclude Mykola Onischuk from Working Group on issues of developing judicial legislation and implementation of justice
UNBA called the President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to exclude Mykola Olischuk from the Working Group on issues of developing judicial legislation and implementation of justice because of appeals concerning the reforming of advocacy.
This appeal of UNBA was directed to the Presidential Office.
It says in the document, that of October 9th 2019 during the broadcast of “Pravo TV” Mykola Onischuk announced plans of headed by him Working Group to create a new version of the law “On advocacy and legal practice” and to pass this draft law the Verkhovna Rada through the Presidential Office. With that, Mykola Onischuk made defamatory statements about the activity of Ukrainian advocacy and gave biased evaluations of UNBA’s position
«We think, that public comments of Mr. Onischuk have shown his disrespect to the municipal institute of advocacy of Ukraine, not understanding the key principles of its activity and ignorance of international standards of developing changes in the profile law. Biased evaluations of Working Group’s Head has already made a reputational damage to the institute of advocacy and defamed consultative and advisory organization, which he is a part of», - says in the appeal.
Advocates’ community emphasized, that Head of the Working Group within the Commission on the legal reformation factually testified his intentions to lobby the draft law №9055, which was brought by the fifth president Petro Poroshenko and wasn’t passed due to active resistance of the advocates’ community.
«Such public position of Mr.Onischuk shows his unprofessional biased approaches and lobbyist intentions. It is obvious, that such a position was formed by work experience of Mr. Onischuk as a member of Constitutional Commission at Presidential Office of Ukraine and his participation in the council on issues of the judicial reform, which was coordinated by the head deputy of the Administration at the Presidential Office Alexey Filatov, who secretly developed and accepted scandalous draft law №9055. All these makes it impossible for him to continue his participation in developing the reform of advocacy, which would have been made in accordance with principles of priority of rights and freedoms of humans and citizens and would have counted international obligations of Ukraine and demopcratic standards of organizing municipal institutes of advocacy», - says in the appeal.
UNBA reminded, that last attempt of reforming the advocacy in 2016-2018 through the №9055 evoked public discontent, was negatively criticized by the advocates community and was negatively evaluated not only by advocacy, but also by the most authoritive organizations of legal defense, as the one, which will limit the possibility to protect constitutional rights of citizens, Any initiatives of reanimation of this draft law will have negative effects and cannot be passed in the context of efforts being made by the new government for strengthening of judicial system in Ukraine
Counting intentions of the Ukrainian President to held a real judicial reform, as he has announced on the press-marathon on October 10th 2019, advocates’ community hopes for the reaction from the government and for the fair decision
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Self-government
Efforts to develop advocacy must be brought to fruition — A. Misyats
The Ukrainian advocacy profession is currently going through a critical phase. Amid the war, it must ensure the continuity of legal aid, defend the independence of the profession, and improve qualification and disciplinary procedures in accordance with European standards. The work that has been started must be brought to a practical conclusion.
Support
Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA
On September 18, a working meeting was held at the office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with Executive Director of the International Bar Association (IBA) Mark Ellis. The parties discussed the Ukrainian advocacy profession’s participation in European legal processes, the protection of the UNBA’s digital infrastructure, psychological support for advocates and future areas of cooperation.
Educational events
Tax residency of Ukrainians abroad: what matters
The determination of tax residency for Ukrainians who have been living abroad for an extended period depends on the combination of their personal and economic ties to each country. The established status determines the procedure for reporting income, paying taxes and fulfilling CFC reporting obligations.
War
Are Europe's advocacy associations prepared for a potential war? V. Gvozdiy shared lessons from the Ukrainian experience
The continuity of the bar’s self-governance, the protection of professional registries and archives, as well as equal guarantees of employment for advocates, judges, and prosecutors must be enshrined in advance in legislation in the event of war or another emergency.
Legal defence of military personnel
Payments to military personnel require clear and uniform criteria — UNBA Committee
The vagueness of terms in subordinate regulatory acts leads to differing interpretations of the grounds for paying additional compensation to military personnel. The UNBA has proposed harmonizing these acts and establishing transparent criteria for the allocation of funds.
Discussion
Finding them isn't enough: issues surrounding the seizure and return of crypto assets
The technical structure of transactions does not automatically identify the person who controlled the crypto wallet, and courts have reached differing conclusions on whether a digital asset can be seized as physical evidence. So how can one prove ownership of such assets, enforce court orders, and return funds to victims?
Legislation
The UNBA will prepare guidelines on lawyers' requests
By the end of 2026, the UNBA Committee on the prevention of administrative offenses committed against advocates will develop guidelines on drafting advocate inquiries and responding to refusals to provide information. There are also plans to standardize the practice of applying Article 212-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection