UNBA called the president to exclude Mykola Onischuk from Working Group on issues of developing judicial legislation and implementation of justice
UNBA called the President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to exclude Mykola Olischuk from the Working Group on issues of developing judicial legislation and implementation of justice because of appeals concerning the reforming of advocacy.
This appeal of UNBA was directed to the Presidential Office.
It says in the document, that of October 9th 2019 during the broadcast of “Pravo TV” Mykola Onischuk announced plans of headed by him Working Group to create a new version of the law “On advocacy and legal practice” and to pass this draft law the Verkhovna Rada through the Presidential Office. With that, Mykola Onischuk made defamatory statements about the activity of Ukrainian advocacy and gave biased evaluations of UNBA’s position
«We think, that public comments of Mr. Onischuk have shown his disrespect to the municipal institute of advocacy of Ukraine, not understanding the key principles of its activity and ignorance of international standards of developing changes in the profile law. Biased evaluations of Working Group’s Head has already made a reputational damage to the institute of advocacy and defamed consultative and advisory organization, which he is a part of», - says in the appeal.
Advocates’ community emphasized, that Head of the Working Group within the Commission on the legal reformation factually testified his intentions to lobby the draft law №9055, which was brought by the fifth president Petro Poroshenko and wasn’t passed due to active resistance of the advocates’ community.
«Such public position of Mr.Onischuk shows his unprofessional biased approaches and lobbyist intentions. It is obvious, that such a position was formed by work experience of Mr. Onischuk as a member of Constitutional Commission at Presidential Office of Ukraine and his participation in the council on issues of the judicial reform, which was coordinated by the head deputy of the Administration at the Presidential Office Alexey Filatov, who secretly developed and accepted scandalous draft law №9055. All these makes it impossible for him to continue his participation in developing the reform of advocacy, which would have been made in accordance with principles of priority of rights and freedoms of humans and citizens and would have counted international obligations of Ukraine and demopcratic standards of organizing municipal institutes of advocacy», - says in the appeal.
UNBA reminded, that last attempt of reforming the advocacy in 2016-2018 through the №9055 evoked public discontent, was negatively criticized by the advocates community and was negatively evaluated not only by advocacy, but also by the most authoritive organizations of legal defense, as the one, which will limit the possibility to protect constitutional rights of citizens, Any initiatives of reanimation of this draft law will have negative effects and cannot be passed in the context of efforts being made by the new government for strengthening of judicial system in Ukraine
Counting intentions of the Ukrainian President to held a real judicial reform, as he has announced on the press-marathon on October 10th 2019, advocates’ community hopes for the reaction from the government and for the fair decision
Popular news
Discussion
Why lowering the age of marriage lacks legal logic
Although until 2012 there was a provision in family law that allowed children to marry from the age of 14 under certain circumstances, its return to Ukrainian law would contradict international obligations and the logic of criminal law.
Self-government
A report on Ukrainian advocacy was presented in the European Parliament
Can a shadow report on advocacy replace the political framework of the Roadmap on the rule of law with demands for the restructuring of self-government? Where is the line between accountability and the seizure of institutions? And how can we respond to narratives with data rather than impressions?
European integration
UNBA and Ukraine's representation to the EU have synchronized their priorities
On February 5, in Brussels, the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova held a working meeting with the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Ukraine, Representative of Ukraine to the European Union Vsevolod Chentsov.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Proceedings opened following attack on advocate in Dnipro
The Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of legal practice of the UNBA appealed to law enforcement agencies in connection with an advocate's report of an attack while performing his professional duties. The information was entered into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations and a pre-trial investigation was initiated.
Interaction
«With us — to Europe»: Italian advocacy supports UNBA initiatives
On January 30, a meeting was held in Rome between a delegation from the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the National Bar Council of Italy (Consiglio Nazionale Forense, CNF) on the standards and practices of the legal profession and their significance for Ukraine's European integration process.
Interaction
France confirms cooperation with UNBA on reforms in the field of the rule of law
On January 29, a working meeting between representatives of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the French National Bar Council (Conseil National des Barreaux, CNB) took place in Paris.
Abroad
UNBA office opens in EU capital
To strengthen the institutional presence of the Ukrainian advocacy community at the European level, an office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association has been opened in Brussels (Belgium), which will serve as a permanent platform for dialogue with European partners.
Interaction
UNBA and BRAK discussed European integration priorities and regulation of the profession
On January 26, a meeting was held between representatives of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the German Federal Bar Association (Bundesrechtsanwaltskammer, BRAK).
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine