E-Court failures violate constitutional guarantees – UNBA

Advocacy
18:05 Thu 29.02.24 848 Reviews
Print

In recent days, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has received numerous reports from lawyers about technical failures in the operation of the Electronic Court subsystem. In particular, the complaints relate to the inability to log in to the electronic office, which restricts advocates in exercising their procedural rights, in particular, to submit documents and participate in court hearings in the videoconference mode.

The UNBA informed the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine, which, in accordance with the Regulation on the Procedure for the Functioning of Certain Subsystems (Modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, approved by the decision of the HCJ of 17.08.2021 No. 1845/0/15-21, is responsible for the proper functioning of the Electronic Court subsystem of the UJITS.

The lawyers also drew the attention of the SJAU to the fact that technical failures in the E-Court subsystem lead to a violation of the human right to access to justice and a fair trial guaranteed by Article 55 of the Constitution of Ukraine and Article 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

According to clause 4 of the Regulation, the owner of the UJITS software is the state represented by the SJAU. UJITS operates on the basis of the main and backup data centers. Organizational and financial support for the creation and operation of individual subsystems (modules) of the UISIS is provided by the SJAU.

In view of this, the UNBA asked the SJAU to eliminate technical problems in the operation of the E-Court subsystem and to ensure the possibility of exercising the rights of litigants.

Popular news

A report on Ukrainian advocacy was presented in the European Parliament

Self-government

A report on Ukrainian advocacy was presented in the European Parliament

Can a shadow report on advocacy replace the political framework of the Roadmap on the rule of law with demands for the restructuring of self-government? Where is the line between accountability and the seizure of institutions? And how can we respond to narratives with data rather than impressions?

15:28 Fri 06.02.26 122
Proceedings opened following attack on advocate in Dnipro

Guarantees of the practice of law

Proceedings opened following attack on advocate in Dnipro

The Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of legal practice of the UNBA appealed to law enforcement agencies in connection with an advocate's report of an attack while performing his professional duties. The information was entered into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations and a pre-trial investigation was initiated.

15:53 Wed 04.02.26 133
UNBA office opens in EU capital

Abroad

UNBA office opens in EU capital

To strengthen the institutional presence of the Ukrainian advocacy community at the European level, an office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association has been opened in Brussels (Belgium), which will serve as a permanent platform for dialogue with European partners.

18:21 Thu 29.01.26 129
Identifying an advocate with a client is a blow to justice, — V. Gvozdiy

Guarantees of the practice of law

Identifying an advocate with a client is a blow to justice, — V. Gvozdiy

By defending individuals in criminal proceedings, advocates are in fact fighting for every person's right to a fair trial. Therefore, any identification of an advocate with their client is a blow not only to the profession, but also to justice itself.

13:10 Mon 19.01.26 108
Impunity for public stigmatization of advocates violates the constitutional right to defense

Guarantees of the practice of law

Impunity for public stigmatization of advocates violates the constitutional right to defense

The prohibition of identifying an advocate with a client is an international standard enshrined in the Law «On advocacy and legal practice». However, without accountability, this guarantee does not work, which poses a direct threat to the realization of the right to defense and the principle of adversarial proceedings.

13:11 Fri 16.01.26 123
Inheritance of a share in joint property and more: advocates have made comments

Legislation

Inheritance of a share in joint property and more: advocates have made comments

In the event of the death of one of the subjects of joint shared ownership, the shares of each of the co-owners in the joint shared ownership shall be deemed equal, unless otherwise agreed between them, by law, or by a court decision.

12:58 Fri 16.01.26 174
How the reform of advocacy is «preventing» Ukraine from signing the Council of Europe Convention

Discussion

How the reform of advocacy is «preventing» Ukraine from signing the Council of Europe Convention

During the regular meeting of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held on January 12, MPs heard information from the Ministry of Justice on resolving the issue of signing and ratifying the Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate.

14:59 Wed 14.01.26 104
Implementation of the Roadmap: the composition of the working group ensures a high level of expertise

Legislation

Implementation of the Roadmap: the composition of the working group ensures a high level of expertise

The composition of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in relation to advocacy demonstrates the high institutional level of the experts involved by the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the formation of a package of decisions.

12:17 Fri 09.01.26 125

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл