The principle of continuity of power in time of war was discussed at a roundtable
Observance of the principle of institutional continuity of power in Ukraine is extremely important in the current military situation, as depriving the Ukrainian government of its legitimacy is one of the obvious priorities of the aggressor not only for propaganda but also for discrediting it in the international arena.
This conclusion was reached by the participants of the roundtable discussion «The Principle of Institutional Continuity of Power in Ukraine: Challenges in the Context of Martial Law and the Post-War Period» organized by the UNBA Committees on Electoral Law and Rule of Law.
During the round table, the following issues were discussed:
1. Legislative regulation of the institution of continuity of power in the context of national and international standards: parliamentary and presidential dimensions;
2. The role of constitutional control bodies in terms of official interpretation of the issues of continuity of power;
3. Law enforcement practice on the institutional framework for the continuity of power: court opinions, CEC practice, etc.
The event was attended by members of the NAAU committees, MPs of Ukraine, the Head of the Administrative Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court, members of the Central Election Commission of Ukraine, academics, representatives of the International Foundation for Electoral Systems IFES and the NGO Center for Political and Legal Reforms. The event was attended by students of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.
Maryna Stavniychuk, Chairman of the Rule of Law Committee, outlined in detail the issue of standards for the organization of state power in wartime. The speaker described the legal basis of the continuum as a principle of international law. The speaker noted that the Constitution of Ukraine provides an exhaustive answer to the question of ensuring the principle of institutional continuity of power in the context of systematic interpretation of the Constitution of Ukraine.
Mykhailo Smokovych, Chairman of the Administrative Court of Cassation within the Supreme Court, emphasized that the principle of institutional continuity of power is contained in the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, in particular, regarding the powers of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and the powers of the President of Ukraine. He also emphasized that the issue of continuity of power also applies to other state authorities, in particular, the judiciary.
Oleksandr Kachura, Deputy Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Organization of State Power, Local Self-Government, Regional Development and Urban Planning, outlined the importance of ensuring the principle of institutional continuity of power and noted the need to obtain the position of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine on the official interpretation of this issue in wartime.
Andriy Yevstigneev, a member of the Central Election Commission of Ukraine and the Council of the Committee on Electoral Law spoke about the CEC's law enforcement practice regarding the powers of public authorities at different levels and the problem of suspending electoral processes for the election of deputies at different levels.
Olga Lotiuk, Chairman of the Department of Constitutional Law at the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, devoted a significant part of her report to the principles that form the basis of the constitutional order in Ukraine, paying special attention to the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine.
Oksana Vasylchenko, Professor of the Department of Constitutional Law at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv and member of the Board of the UNBA Committee on Election Law, analyzed the issue of the official interpretation of the problem of institutional continuity of power by the Constitutional Court of Ukraine. At the same time, the speaker emphasized the need to form the judges of the constitutional control body as soon as possible.
Borys Siklitskyi, a member of the Council of the Committee on Electoral Law, spoke about the legal positions of the continuity of power, in particular, the study of the practice of international judicial institutions.
Tetyana Saviak, a member of the Electoral Law Committee's Council, made a presentation on the legislative regulation of the institution of the continuity of power in the context of the powers of the President of Ukraine. The speaker analyzed the content of the relevant provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine concerning the need to prevent ambiguous interpretation of the issue of the exercise of powers by the President of Ukraine.
Mykola Torbeyev, a member of the Council of the Committee on Electoral Law, voiced problematic issues of institutional continuity of power in the context of acquiring and terminating powers of deputies of different levels.
Oleksandr Kliuzhev, an expert on electoral law reform at the International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) in Ukraine, joined the roundtable discussion and emphasized the need to take into account the position of civil society representatives, which relates to a proper understanding of the principle of institutional continuity of power and may become a prerequisite for future post-war elections in Ukraine.
Yulia Kyrychenko, a member of the Board and head of constitutional law projects at the Center of Policy and Legal Reform, also expressed her opinion. She emphasized the importance of communicating to the public the main characteristics of the institutional framework for the continuity of power. She also expressed the position that it is inexpedient to appeal to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to interpret the issue of continuity of powers of public authorities in Ukraine. The speaker also pointed out the decisive role of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine in the appointment of the first post-war elections in Ukraine.
Alla Basalaeva, Chairman of the Committee on Electoral Law, summarized the positions of the participants and reiterated the readiness of the bar community to actively cooperate with the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government, as well as with representatives of civil society in the issues of information and legal coverage of the institution of continuity of power in Ukraine.
Popular news
Advocacy
FLA needs urgent help, - Valentyn Gvozdiy
Twelve years of existence of the free legal aid system in Ukraine is enough to understand the inability of the Ministry of Justice to effectively manage this area.
Advocacy
The Ombudsman is concerned about the state of the FLA system
The Secretariat of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights is ready to join the development of proposals for amendments to the legal acts developed by the Ukrainian National Bar Association that will improve the functioning of the free legal aid system.
Advocacy
Ombudsman to provide legal aid with support of UNBA - pilot project
The Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights has launched a pilot project to provide professional legal aid to citizens in five regions of Ukraine.
Advocacy
Another model should be introduced for the FLA system, - Lidiya Izovitova
Monitoring of the current state of functioning of the legal aid system shows the existence of significant and conceptual problems in the implementation of this assistance in Ukraine.
Advocacy
Violation of media guarantees of advocacy is being studied by the UNBA
An open appeal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Information Policy and Interaction with the Mass Media to the advocates.
Advocacy
Lawyers are offered to be booked - amendments to draft law No. 10449
In their amendments to the draft law on strengthening mobilization, MPs propose to provide for the booking of lawyers. The goal is to prevent disruptions of court hearings.
Advocacy
E-Court failures violate constitutional guarantees – UNBA
In recent days, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has received numerous reports from lawyers about technical failures in the operation of the Electronic Court subsystem. In particular, the complaints relate to the inability to log in to the electronic office, which restricts advocates in exercising their procedural rights, in particular, to submit documents and participate in court hearings in the videoconference mode.
Advocacy
Fixed fee: time of work is important for reimbursement of attorney's fees – SC
The procedure for calculating the hourly fee differs from the fixed fee, which does not take into account the actual time spent. However, in both cases, they are taken into account when deciding on the reimbursement of legal aid expenses.
Publications
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…