Restrictions on access to registries should not violate the rights of third parties
The criteria and mechanism for restricting access to information from state registers of intellectual property rights related to national security and defense during martial law should exclude the possibility of violating the rights of third parties.
The UNBA Committee on Civil Law and Procedure drew attention to this in its comments and proposals to the draft Law No. 11533 dated 29.08.2024 «On Amendments to the Civil Code of Ukraine and Some Other Laws of Ukraine on the Peculiarities of Providing Information from Public Electronic Registers Owned by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and Some Other Public Electronic Registers».
The authors of the initiative point out that intellectual property registers contain information on intellectual property objects (inventions, utility models, industrial designs, etc.) related to national security and defense, which are of particular interest to the enemy during military operations.
Therefore, it is proposed to provide in the laws «On Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models», «On Protection of Rights to Industrial Designs», «On Protection of Rights to Trademarks and Service Marks», «On Protection of Rights to Semiconductor Product Layouts», «On Copyright and Related Rights» that access of individuals and legal entities to the information of state registers of intellectual property rights on state registration of intellectual property rights related to national security and defense may be restricted for the period of martial law in Ukraine.
Access will be restricted at the request of the owner of a patent, industrial design, trademark certificate, or copyright holder of a work.
At the same time, the UNBA notes that the draft law does not provide for state control over whether the object in question really belongs to the areas related to national security and defense. At the same time, the definitions of «defense of Ukraine» and «national security» in the laws «On Defense of Ukraine» and «On National Security of Ukraine» are so broad that any intellectual property object can be included.
Thus, an unscrupulous owner of an intellectual property object may conceal the fact of registration of rights to the object in order to avoid its division or division of income that he or she will receive from its use and to which other participants in civil relations, such as the company where the person works, the other spouse, or co-authors, will be entitled.
The UNBA Committee is convinced that this risk requires more detailed regulatory and legal regulation in order to prevent violation of the rights of third parties.
Popular news
Advocacy
The UNBA is studying additional opportunities to support advocates
The full-scale invasion has seriously affected the mental health of all Ukrainians. There are certain vulnerable groups that have been most affected by the war in their personal and professional lives, including lawyers.
Advocacy
Everyone deserves protection, the Bar fulfills this requirement of the Constitution
The formation of the opinion in society that lawyers somehow choose their clients incorrectly because some people are not worthy of defense is a very dangerous phenomenon for the state. In the future, our enemies can use it against Ukraine.
Advocacy
The peculiarities of publishing decisions of the QDCB were explained by the BCU
According to the Law on Access to Public Information, managers of such information are obliged to publish the acts they adopt. At the same time, the decisions made by the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the bar contain both attorney-client privilege and personal data.
Advocacy
Public perception of the role of lawyers is a global problem, - V. Gvozdiy
«Statements and actions that undermine confidence in the independence of the legal profession and potentially threaten the safety of lawyers ultimately undermine confidence in the entire justice system and the rule of law. No lawyer should be attacked for doing their job».
Advocacy
UNBA comments on lawyers' «interference» in mobilization processes
Recently, after another scandal, the Volyn Regional Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support stated that lawyers should not interfere with the processes of mobilization and military medical examination. The statement has already been commented on by the National Bar Association of Ukraine.
Advocacy
HCJ engages Valentyn Gvozdiy to develop measures to ensure judicial independence
Valentyn Gvozdiy, Vice President of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Bar Council of Ukraine, was appointed to the working group on the development and implementation of measures to ensure the independence of judges and the authority of justice.
Advocacy
Use of legal remedies is not pressure – BCU
Lidiya Izovitova, the President of the UNBA, BCU appealed to the Prosecutor General's Office and the Council of Prosecutors of Ukraine regarding the inadmissibility of pressure on lawyers who use legal means of defense in the framework of providing legal aid.
Advocacy
The Council of Europe supports the development of UNBA
The Council of Europe Office in Ukraine will provide all possible support for the development of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and its initiatives for the benefit of Ukrainian society.
Publications
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…