Restrictions on access to registries should not violate the rights of third parties
The criteria and mechanism for restricting access to information from state registers of intellectual property rights related to national security and defense during martial law should exclude the possibility of violating the rights of third parties.
The UNBA Committee on Civil Law and Procedure drew attention to this in its comments and proposals to the draft Law No. 11533 dated 29.08.2024 «On Amendments to the Civil Code of Ukraine and Some Other Laws of Ukraine on the Peculiarities of Providing Information from Public Electronic Registers Owned by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine and Some Other Public Electronic Registers».
The authors of the initiative point out that intellectual property registers contain information on intellectual property objects (inventions, utility models, industrial designs, etc.) related to national security and defense, which are of particular interest to the enemy during military operations.
Therefore, it is proposed to provide in the laws «On Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models», «On Protection of Rights to Industrial Designs», «On Protection of Rights to Trademarks and Service Marks», «On Protection of Rights to Semiconductor Product Layouts», «On Copyright and Related Rights» that access of individuals and legal entities to the information of state registers of intellectual property rights on state registration of intellectual property rights related to national security and defense may be restricted for the period of martial law in Ukraine.
Access will be restricted at the request of the owner of a patent, industrial design, trademark certificate, or copyright holder of a work.
At the same time, the UNBA notes that the draft law does not provide for state control over whether the object in question really belongs to the areas related to national security and defense. At the same time, the definitions of «defense of Ukraine» and «national security» in the laws «On Defense of Ukraine» and «On National Security of Ukraine» are so broad that any intellectual property object can be included.
Thus, an unscrupulous owner of an intellectual property object may conceal the fact of registration of rights to the object in order to avoid its division or division of income that he or she will receive from its use and to which other participants in civil relations, such as the company where the person works, the other spouse, or co-authors, will be entitled.
The UNBA Committee is convinced that this risk requires more detailed regulatory and legal regulation in order to prevent violation of the rights of third parties.
Popular news
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
European integration
The subgroup on European integration held its inaugural meeting
On March 5, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in terms of reforming the advocacy sector, entitled «European integration, international practice and digitalization».
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates