Why objections to the opening of appeal proceedings do not work
In order to improve the efficiency of the process, the Verkhovna Rada is proposed to grant participants in civil and administrative cases the right to file objections to the opening of appeal proceedings before they are opened. However, such an initiative will have no practical value.
This was noted by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Civil Law and Procedure following the analysis of Draft Law No. 12061 of 24.09.2024 «On Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine regarding certain rights of participants in cases».
Thus, Articles 359 of the Civil Procedure Code and 300 of the Code of Administrative Procedure define the rules for opening appeal proceedings. The Draft proposes to supplement them with the provision that «before the opening of the appeal proceedings, the parties to the case have the right to file an objection to the opening of the appeal proceedings».
The UNBA noted that a similar provision is already contained in Part 2 of Article 262 of the Commercial Procedure Code, but it is declarative and has not been effectively applied and implemented since its introduction.
One of the purposes of granting the parties to the commercial proceedings the right to file objections to the opening of the appeal proceedings was to provide an opportunity to object to the appellant's filing of an appeal, in the absence of the right to appeal the decision to open the appeal proceedings. However, the EPC, while declaring the right to file such objections, does not contain an effective form of exercising this right that would contribute to achieving the ultimate goal (in particular, taking into account the arguments set forth in the objections by the court of appeal when deciding to open or refuse to open the appeal proceedings).
According to the Unified State Register of Court Decisions, the percentage of exercising the right to file objections to the opening of appeal proceedings is less than 1%. In most cases, such objections are limited to setting out the circumstances that are reviewed by the appellate court when considering the case on the merits, and not at the stage of opening the appeal proceedings. Therefore, the appellate courts do not take into account such content of the objection when opening the appeal proceedings, but are guided solely by Articles 260 and 261 of the EPC.
Therefore, even if we assume the effectiveness of filing objections before the opening of the appeal proceedings, it is still necessary to provide an expanded interpretation of the requirements and criteria for the content, preparation and procedure for filing such objections with the court by analogy with Articles 178, 360 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
However, since the provision enshrined in part 2 of Article 262 of the EPC has not been implemented in practice, supplementing the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Administrative Procedure with a similar provision will be inappropriate and ineffective.
For full comments and suggestions to the Draft Law No. 12061, please follow the link.
Popular news
Discussion
Why lowering the age of marriage lacks legal logic
Although until 2012 there was a provision in family law that allowed children to marry from the age of 14 under certain circumstances, its return to Ukrainian law would contradict international obligations and the logic of criminal law.
European integration
Open dialogue between the UNBA and the European Commission on the path to EU
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a working meeting in Brussels with Mr Wolfgang Nozar, Head of Unit for Governance, Rule of Law and Financial Assistance, Directorate-General for Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood (DG ENEST), European Commission.
Self-government
A report on Ukrainian advocacy was presented in the European Parliament
Can a shadow report on advocacy replace the political framework of the Roadmap on the rule of law with demands for the restructuring of self-government? Where is the line between accountability and the seizure of institutions? And how can we respond to narratives with data rather than impressions?
European integration
UNBA and Ukraine's representation to the EU have synchronized their priorities
On February 5, in Brussels, the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova held a working meeting with the Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Ukraine, Representative of Ukraine to the European Union Vsevolod Chentsov.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Proceedings opened following attack on advocate in Dnipro
The Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of legal practice of the UNBA appealed to law enforcement agencies in connection with an advocate's report of an attack while performing his professional duties. The information was entered into the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations and a pre-trial investigation was initiated.
Interaction
«With us — to Europe»: Italian advocacy supports UNBA initiatives
On January 30, a meeting was held in Rome between a delegation from the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the National Bar Council of Italy (Consiglio Nazionale Forense, CNF) on the standards and practices of the legal profession and their significance for Ukraine's European integration process.
Interaction
France confirms cooperation with UNBA on reforms in the field of the rule of law
On January 29, a working meeting between representatives of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the French National Bar Council (Conseil National des Barreaux, CNB) took place in Paris.
Abroad
UNBA office opens in EU capital
To strengthen the institutional presence of the Ukrainian advocacy community at the European level, an office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association has been opened in Brussels (Belgium), which will serve as a permanent platform for dialogue with European partners.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine