Why objections to the opening of appeal proceedings do not work
In order to improve the efficiency of the process, the Verkhovna Rada is proposed to grant participants in civil and administrative cases the right to file objections to the opening of appeal proceedings before they are opened. However, such an initiative will have no practical value.
This was noted by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Civil Law and Procedure following the analysis of Draft Law No. 12061 of 24.09.2024 «On Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine regarding certain rights of participants in cases».
Thus, Articles 359 of the Civil Procedure Code and 300 of the Code of Administrative Procedure define the rules for opening appeal proceedings. The Draft proposes to supplement them with the provision that «before the opening of the appeal proceedings, the parties to the case have the right to file an objection to the opening of the appeal proceedings».
The UNBA noted that a similar provision is already contained in Part 2 of Article 262 of the Commercial Procedure Code, but it is declarative and has not been effectively applied and implemented since its introduction.
One of the purposes of granting the parties to the commercial proceedings the right to file objections to the opening of the appeal proceedings was to provide an opportunity to object to the appellant's filing of an appeal, in the absence of the right to appeal the decision to open the appeal proceedings. However, the EPC, while declaring the right to file such objections, does not contain an effective form of exercising this right that would contribute to achieving the ultimate goal (in particular, taking into account the arguments set forth in the objections by the court of appeal when deciding to open or refuse to open the appeal proceedings).
According to the Unified State Register of Court Decisions, the percentage of exercising the right to file objections to the opening of appeal proceedings is less than 1%. In most cases, such objections are limited to setting out the circumstances that are reviewed by the appellate court when considering the case on the merits, and not at the stage of opening the appeal proceedings. Therefore, the appellate courts do not take into account such content of the objection when opening the appeal proceedings, but are guided solely by Articles 260 and 261 of the EPC.
Therefore, even if we assume the effectiveness of filing objections before the opening of the appeal proceedings, it is still necessary to provide an expanded interpretation of the requirements and criteria for the content, preparation and procedure for filing such objections with the court by analogy with Articles 178, 360 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
However, since the provision enshrined in part 2 of Article 262 of the EPC has not been implemented in practice, supplementing the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Administrative Procedure with a similar provision will be inappropriate and ineffective.
For full comments and suggestions to the Draft Law No. 12061, please follow the link.
Popular news
Legislation
Advocates have warned that the draft Labor Code would curtail workers' protections
Certain provisions of the draft Labor Code of Ukraine regarding collective labor disputes undermine labor protections and do not comply with constitutional and international standards.
Educational events
The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works
The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.
Interaction
The UNBA and the Coordination headquarters have agreed to cooperate in assisting those released from captivity
Servicemen released from captivity, family members of prisoners of war, civilians deprived of their personal liberty as a result of armed aggression, as well as persons missing in connection with the war, will gain additional opportunities to access legal assistance and protect their rights.
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Announcements
The Bar Council of Ukraine begins its meeting
Today, April 2, a meeting of the Bar Council of Ukraine is taking place in Kyiv. On the agenda are issues related to the activities of bar self-governing bodies, consideration of a decision by the High Council of Justice, a number of appeals, as well as a discussion of the current state and pressing issues regarding the functioning of the legal aid system.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the profession: the subgroup focused on internships and practical training
The Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a regular meeting of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the Implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding the reform of advocacy.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates