Why objections to the opening of appeal proceedings do not work
In order to improve the efficiency of the process, the Verkhovna Rada is proposed to grant participants in civil and administrative cases the right to file objections to the opening of appeal proceedings before they are opened. However, such an initiative will have no practical value.
This was noted by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Civil Law and Procedure following the analysis of Draft Law No. 12061 of 24.09.2024 «On Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, the Commercial Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine regarding certain rights of participants in cases».
Thus, Articles 359 of the Civil Procedure Code and 300 of the Code of Administrative Procedure define the rules for opening appeal proceedings. The Draft proposes to supplement them with the provision that «before the opening of the appeal proceedings, the parties to the case have the right to file an objection to the opening of the appeal proceedings».
The UNBA noted that a similar provision is already contained in Part 2 of Article 262 of the Commercial Procedure Code, but it is declarative and has not been effectively applied and implemented since its introduction.
One of the purposes of granting the parties to the commercial proceedings the right to file objections to the opening of the appeal proceedings was to provide an opportunity to object to the appellant's filing of an appeal, in the absence of the right to appeal the decision to open the appeal proceedings. However, the EPC, while declaring the right to file such objections, does not contain an effective form of exercising this right that would contribute to achieving the ultimate goal (in particular, taking into account the arguments set forth in the objections by the court of appeal when deciding to open or refuse to open the appeal proceedings).
According to the Unified State Register of Court Decisions, the percentage of exercising the right to file objections to the opening of appeal proceedings is less than 1%. In most cases, such objections are limited to setting out the circumstances that are reviewed by the appellate court when considering the case on the merits, and not at the stage of opening the appeal proceedings. Therefore, the appellate courts do not take into account such content of the objection when opening the appeal proceedings, but are guided solely by Articles 260 and 261 of the EPC.
Therefore, even if we assume the effectiveness of filing objections before the opening of the appeal proceedings, it is still necessary to provide an expanded interpretation of the requirements and criteria for the content, preparation and procedure for filing such objections with the court by analogy with Articles 178, 360 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
However, since the provision enshrined in part 2 of Article 262 of the EPC has not been implemented in practice, supplementing the Code of Civil Procedure and the Code of Administrative Procedure with a similar provision will be inappropriate and ineffective.
For full comments and suggestions to the Draft Law No. 12061, please follow the link.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences