A case was opened against an activist who called for checking advocates through clients
The Shevchenkivskyi Police Department of the Main Department of the National Police in Kyiv registered in the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations information about interference with the activities of a defense counsel (Article 397 of the Criminal Code) on the facts of Iryna Fedoriv publication of articles about the activities of advocate Rostyslav Kravets.
The criminal proceeding №12025105100000394 was registered on March 13. An extract from the Unified Register of Pre-trial Investigations was posted on his Telegram page by R. Kravets himself.
«It is clear from the case file that on August 21, 2024, a person named Fedoriv Iryna Pavlivna published a post on her Facebook page, as well as on the page of the GOLKA public organization, about the advocacy of Kravets R.Y., thus interfering with his advocacy», - the document says.
Obviously, this is a post in which the woman violates the prohibition on identifying a lawyer with a client and calls for attention to those lawyers «who systematically and independently choose their own «cotton wool» clients and desperately defend them in court». And in the author's publication on the website GOLKA (I. Fedoriv is the head of this public organization), he refers to «lawyers who systematically represent in court the interests of traitors, «Maidan judges» and other pests of statehood».
As a reminder, under Part 1 of Art. 397 of the Criminal Code, any form of obstruction of the lawful activities of a defense counsel or representative of a person in providing legal aid or violation of the guarantees of their activities and professional secrecy established by law is punishable by a fine of one hundred to two hundred tax-free minimum incomes, or correctional labor for up to two years, or probationary supervision for up to three years, or restraint of liberty for the same term.
Photo for illustration taken from I. Fedoriv's Facebook page.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences