UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»

Advocacy
19:17 Wed 23.04.25 639 Reviews
Print

Dzerkalo Tyzhnia's publications about «hacker lawyers» contain false information, distortions and manipulations that undermine the authority of the Bar. They are a form of unlawful pressure on the UNBA and may be an element of a paid-for campaign.

The Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association issued a statement condemning such methods of media work and appealed to the media and other resources to immediately stop spreading false information.

Here is the full text of the document:

Regarding the publications of Dzerkalo Tyzhnia

about «hacker lawyers»

On April 22 - 23, 2025, the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia published a number of publications about the criminal proceedings and the announcement of suspicion by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine to lawyers accused of unlawful interference with the Unified State Register of Court Decisions, namely:

  • article by the editor of the internal policy department of ZN. ua internal policy department editor Iryna Vedernikova «The Case of Hacker Lawyers: How NABU Detected Parasites»
  • news «Borzykh's group engaged a hacker to access the court register, against whom they had been fighting a case as military prosecutors, - sources»
  • news «Borzykh's case points to a deep crisis of the Ukrainian Bar. The President's Office is only benefiting from it»
  • news «The Bar Association headed by Izovitova has become a corporate shield in the Borzykh case»

The Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association states that these publications contain false and distorted (and therefore manipulative) information about the role of the UNBA in the protection of advocates. The dissemination of such materials damages the reputation and undermines the authority of the Bar in the eyes of the public. In addition, the very fact of publishing the article and its systematic promotion by individual news outlets contains signs of unlawful pressure on the constitutional institution.

The UNBA does not interfere in criminal proceedings, does not assess the progress of crime investigations and does not defend criminals, as it is presented today by the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia.

The main task of the UNBA, according to the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», is to implement the tasks of the bar self-government, one of which is to ensure the independence of lawyers and protection against interference in the practice of law. After all, the professional rights, honor and dignity of advocates are guaranteed and protected by the Constitution and laws. The relevant law (Art. 23) provides a list of guarantees of the practice of law, including a special procedure for conducting operational and investigative measures and investigative actions, notification of suspicion, disciplinary proceedings, etc.

Thus, the UNBA, through its bodies (in particular, committees), in accordance with the law, protects the professional rights of advocates and ensures compliance with the guarantees of the practice of law, regardless of their personalities.

It is within the framework of fulfilling this task assigned to the UNBA by law that in 2024 the Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy prepared a statement to the Prosecutor General's Office and the State Bureau of Investigation regarding the facts of illegal wiretapping of the lawyers' office, conducting a search there and its subsequent legalization. The court agreed with the arguments presented and ordered law enforcement officers to open criminal proceedings.

Having examined the content of the publications and the circumstances of their placement on the website of the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia publication, the UNBA Committee on protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy believes that in this case there is probably a paid media attack on the institution of the Bar. Its goals may be to shape public opinion in a particular criminal case in the interests of law enforcement agencies, in particular, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine.

The UNBA Committee condemns such methods of pressure, therefore:

  • appeals to the media and other resources to immediately stop disseminating false information;
  • appeals to the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia publication with a request to provide public information on the existence of commercial contractual relations and the availability of documents on the relevant financial settlements.

The Committee is also considering the possibility of filing a complaint about the commission of a crime by a group of persons involved in discrediting the bar.

Chairman of the Committee on protection of advocates' rights

and guarantees of advocacy

of the Ukrainian National Bar Association                                                                                                  E.Solodko

Popular news

The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works

Educational events

The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works

The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.

11:28 Tue 07.04.26 115
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession

Self-government

BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession

The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.

14:56 Thu 02.04.26 120
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel

Interaction

The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel

Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.

12:49 Mon 30.03.26 108
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Interaction

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.

9:59 Fri 27.03.26 174
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

Rule of Law Roadmap

Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.

16:42 Mon 23.03.26 198
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Rule of Law Roadmap

Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.

15:26 Fri 20.03.26 198
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

Discussion

ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».

13:58 Thu 19.03.26 154
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

Rule of Law Roadmap

Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.

18:14 Wed 18.03.26 145

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл