UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»
Dzerkalo Tyzhnia's publications about «hacker lawyers» contain false information, distortions and manipulations that undermine the authority of the Bar. They are a form of unlawful pressure on the UNBA and may be an element of a paid-for campaign.
The Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association issued a statement condemning such methods of media work and appealed to the media and other resources to immediately stop spreading false information.
Here is the full text of the document:
Regarding the publications of Dzerkalo Tyzhnia
about «hacker lawyers»
On April 22 - 23, 2025, the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia published a number of publications about the criminal proceedings and the announcement of suspicion by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine to lawyers accused of unlawful interference with the Unified State Register of Court Decisions, namely:
- article by the editor of the internal policy department of ZN. ua internal policy department editor Iryna Vedernikova «The Case of Hacker Lawyers: How NABU Detected Parasites»
- news «Borzykh's group engaged a hacker to access the court register, against whom they had been fighting a case as military prosecutors, - sources»
- news «Borzykh's case points to a deep crisis of the Ukrainian Bar. The President's Office is only benefiting from it»
- news «The Bar Association headed by Izovitova has become a corporate shield in the Borzykh case»
The Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association states that these publications contain false and distorted (and therefore manipulative) information about the role of the UNBA in the protection of advocates. The dissemination of such materials damages the reputation and undermines the authority of the Bar in the eyes of the public. In addition, the very fact of publishing the article and its systematic promotion by individual news outlets contains signs of unlawful pressure on the constitutional institution.
The UNBA does not interfere in criminal proceedings, does not assess the progress of crime investigations and does not defend criminals, as it is presented today by the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia.
The main task of the UNBA, according to the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», is to implement the tasks of the bar self-government, one of which is to ensure the independence of lawyers and protection against interference in the practice of law. After all, the professional rights, honor and dignity of advocates are guaranteed and protected by the Constitution and laws. The relevant law (Art. 23) provides a list of guarantees of the practice of law, including a special procedure for conducting operational and investigative measures and investigative actions, notification of suspicion, disciplinary proceedings, etc.
Thus, the UNBA, through its bodies (in particular, committees), in accordance with the law, protects the professional rights of advocates and ensures compliance with the guarantees of the practice of law, regardless of their personalities.
It is within the framework of fulfilling this task assigned to the UNBA by law that in 2024 the Committee for the protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy prepared a statement to the Prosecutor General's Office and the State Bureau of Investigation regarding the facts of illegal wiretapping of the lawyers' office, conducting a search there and its subsequent legalization. The court agreed with the arguments presented and ordered law enforcement officers to open criminal proceedings.
Having examined the content of the publications and the circumstances of their placement on the website of the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia publication, the UNBA Committee on protection of advocates' rights and guarantees of advocacy believes that in this case there is probably a paid media attack on the institution of the Bar. Its goals may be to shape public opinion in a particular criminal case in the interests of law enforcement agencies, in particular, the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office and the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine.
The UNBA Committee condemns such methods of pressure, therefore:
- appeals to the media and other resources to immediately stop disseminating false information;
- appeals to the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, the Dzerkalo Tyzhnia publication with a request to provide public information on the existence of commercial contractual relations and the availability of documents on the relevant financial settlements.
The Committee is also considering the possibility of filing a complaint about the commission of a crime by a group of persons involved in discrediting the bar.
Chairman of the Committee on protection of advocates' rights
and guarantees of advocacy
of the Ukrainian National Bar Association E.Solodko
Popular news
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny
Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.
Legislation
Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
The general approach to working on the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law in terms of reforming advocacy should not be based on «slogans», but rather on gathering facts, comparing them with standards, consulting with the professional community, and formulating norms for which participants are prepared to take responsibility.
Legislation
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting
On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.
Self-government
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference
The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.
Self-government
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published
In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.
Publications
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…