The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.
On June 1, 2025, the term of office of the first competition commission with international experts expired.
According to the Law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges», the High Council of Justice had to publish an announcement about the start of the selection of candidates in the «Voice of Ukraine» and on its official website within five days after the previous commission's term ended (i.e., by June 6).
In addition, the HCJ was required to send a written notification of the start of the competition to all entities involved in the formation of the competition commission with a proposal to submit candidates. Among these entities is the Bar Council of Ukraine, which has the legal right to nominate its representatives to the commission.
Since the Bar Council of Ukraine did not receive such a mandatory notification, on June 13, the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova officially appealed to the High Council of Justice with a demand to comply with the deadlines and procedures established by law for the formation of a new composition of the competition commission.
According to a statement on the website of the HCJ, the issue of forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ was included in the draft agenda for the meeting on June 17, but during the vote it was not included in the final agenda, which effectively blocked its consideration.
In response to a request from the UNBA, Deputy chairman of the HCJ Oksana Kvasha noted that «the High Council of Justice is currently discussing the issue of approving the methodology for assessing the compliance of candidates for the position of member of the Competition Commission with the criteria set out in part four of Article 95-1 of the Law».
However, it is critically important that the High Council of Justice did not include this issue on the agenda of its meetings and did not take any official decisions on this matter. This means that Oksana Kvasha's response is her personal opinion and not the official position of the body.
It should be noted that the Law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges» does not provide for the HCJ's powers to determine and approve the methodology for evaluating candidates for the position of member of the competition commission. Article 95-1 establishes strict deadlines for the formation of the competition commission, determined in days, so the High Council of Justice had to take care of all the preparatory procedures in advance, not after the expiry of the term of office of the previous composition.
According to Article 95-1 of the Law, candidates are selected by the entities forming the competition commission themselves – the Council of Judges of Ukraine, the Council of Prosecutors of Ukraine, the Bar Council of Ukraine and the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, which submit their proposals for candidates to the HCJ. The High Council of Justice is only obliged to appoint members of the competition commission from among the proposed candidates within five days of receiving the proposals. The criteria for candidates are clearly defined by law: impeccable business reputation, high professional qualities, public authority, and compliance with the criterion of integrity. The law does not require or provide for any additional methodologies for assessing these criteria.
Popular news

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility
Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has appointed Andriy Osipov as head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…