The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Advocacy
17:18 Mon 23.06.25 12 Reviews
Print

The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

On June 1, 2025, the term of office of the first competition commission with international experts expired.

According to the Law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges», the High Council of Justice had to publish an announcement about the start of the selection of candidates in the «Voice of Ukraine» and on its official website within five days after the previous commission's term ended (i.e., by June 6).

In addition, the HCJ was required to send a written notification of the start of the competition to all entities involved in the formation of the competition commission with a proposal to submit candidates. Among these entities is the Bar Council of Ukraine, which has the legal right to nominate its representatives to the commission.

Since the Bar Council of Ukraine did not receive such a mandatory notification, on June 13, the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova officially appealed to the High Council of Justice with a demand to comply with the deadlines and procedures established by law for the formation of a new composition of the competition commission.

According to a statement on the website of the HCJ, the issue of forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ was included in the draft agenda for the meeting on June 17, but during the vote it was not included in the final agenda, which effectively blocked its consideration.

In response to a request from the UNBA, Deputy chairman of the HCJ Oksana Kvasha noted that «the High Council of Justice is currently discussing the issue of approving the methodology for assessing the compliance of candidates for the position of member of the Competition Commission with the criteria set out in part four of Article 95-1 of the Law».

However, it is critically important that the High Council of Justice did not include this issue on the agenda of its meetings and did not take any official decisions on this matter. This means that Oksana Kvasha's response is her personal opinion and not the official position of the body.

It should be noted that the Law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges» does not provide for the HCJ's powers to determine and approve the methodology for evaluating candidates for the position of member of the competition commission. Article 95-1 establishes strict deadlines for the formation of the competition commission, determined in days, so the High Council of Justice had to take care of all the preparatory procedures in advance, not after the expiry of the term of office of the previous composition.

According to Article 95-1 of the Law, candidates are selected by the entities forming the competition commission themselves – the Council of Judges of Ukraine, the Council of Prosecutors of Ukraine, the Bar Council of Ukraine and the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, which submit their proposals for candidates to the HCJ. The High Council of Justice is only obliged to appoint members of the competition commission from among the proposed candidates within five days of receiving the proposals. The criteria for candidates are clearly defined by law: impeccable business reputation, high professional qualities, public authority, and compliance with the criterion of integrity. The law does not require or provide for any additional methodologies for assessing these criteria.

Popular news

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

Advocacy

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

16:35 Fri 30.05.25 154
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy

Advocacy

BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy

The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

17:34 Wed 14.05.25 104
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature

Advocacy

Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature

Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

9:28 Wed 14.05.25 134
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons

Advocacy

BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons

Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

12:32 Wed 07.05.25 112
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)

Advocacy

Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)

The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

14:39 Mon 05.05.25 122
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court

Advocacy

Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court

Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.

16:46 Fri 02.05.25 122
Shoulder straps do not fit the robe: Lidiya Izovitova analyzes models of military courts restoration

Advocacy

Shoulder straps do not fit the robe: Lidiya Izovitova analyzes models of military courts restoration

The Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a working meeting to discuss draft laws that provide for the establishment and operation of military courts in Ukraine on a permanent basis. The Institute of Advocacy presented its reservations regarding this initiative.

15:39 Thu 01.05.25 179
UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»

Advocacy

UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»

Dzerkalo Tyzhnia's publications about «hacker lawyers» contain false information, distortions and manipulations that undermine the authority of the Bar. They are a form of unlawful pressure on the UNBA and may be an element of a paid-for campaign.

19:17 Wed 23.04.25 188

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл