The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.
On June 1, 2025, the term of office of the first competition commission with international experts expired.
According to the Law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges», the High Council of Justice had to publish an announcement about the start of the selection of candidates in the «Voice of Ukraine» and on its official website within five days after the previous commission's term ended (i.e., by June 6).
In addition, the HCJ was required to send a written notification of the start of the competition to all entities involved in the formation of the competition commission with a proposal to submit candidates. Among these entities is the Bar Council of Ukraine, which has the legal right to nominate its representatives to the commission.
Since the Bar Council of Ukraine did not receive such a mandatory notification, on June 13, the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova officially appealed to the High Council of Justice with a demand to comply with the deadlines and procedures established by law for the formation of a new composition of the competition commission.
According to a statement on the website of the HCJ, the issue of forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ was included in the draft agenda for the meeting on June 17, but during the vote it was not included in the final agenda, which effectively blocked its consideration.
In response to a request from the UNBA, Deputy chairman of the HCJ Oksana Kvasha noted that «the High Council of Justice is currently discussing the issue of approving the methodology for assessing the compliance of candidates for the position of member of the Competition Commission with the criteria set out in part four of Article 95-1 of the Law».
However, it is critically important that the High Council of Justice did not include this issue on the agenda of its meetings and did not take any official decisions on this matter. This means that Oksana Kvasha's response is her personal opinion and not the official position of the body.
It should be noted that the Law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges» does not provide for the HCJ's powers to determine and approve the methodology for evaluating candidates for the position of member of the competition commission. Article 95-1 establishes strict deadlines for the formation of the competition commission, determined in days, so the High Council of Justice had to take care of all the preparatory procedures in advance, not after the expiry of the term of office of the previous composition.
According to Article 95-1 of the Law, candidates are selected by the entities forming the competition commission themselves – the Council of Judges of Ukraine, the Council of Prosecutors of Ukraine, the Bar Council of Ukraine and the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, which submit their proposals for candidates to the HCJ. The High Council of Justice is only obliged to appoint members of the competition commission from among the proposed candidates within five days of receiving the proposals. The criteria for candidates are clearly defined by law: impeccable business reputation, high professional qualities, public authority, and compliance with the criterion of integrity. The law does not require or provide for any additional methodologies for assessing these criteria.
Popular news

Legislation
DIC and customs control: advocates warn against the risks of draft law No. 13421
Ukrainian defense companies face bureaucratic delays in importing components, which could critically affect the timing of government contracts. At the same time, the mechanism proposed in the Verkhovna Rada creates risks that could outweigh the potential benefits for the industry.

Discussion
Partnership for reconstruction: UNBA discusses new law on PPPs
Public-private partnerships are considered one of the key tools for Ukraine's recovery, but in practice, their mechanisms remain complex, poorly understood, and often ineffective.

Guarantees of the practice of law
Defended police officers — ended up in the army: advocate mobilized while performing his duties
An advocate specializing in defending the rights of law enforcement officers and who had repeatedly won cases against the police was mobilized while performing his professional duties. The day before, a report appeared in the Oberig registry stating that he had violated military registration rules, and his current deferral was canceled. The advocate was detained, taken to the TCC and the SS, beaten and sent to a military unit.

Announcements
The BCU has begun accepting documents from candidates for the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the HQCJ
The Bar Council of Ukraine announces the start of accepting documents from candidates who wish to be elected to the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges under the BCU quota.

Legislation
Venice Commission warned of risks of changes to disciplinary procedures for Ukrainian judges
The European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) and the Council of Europe Directorate for Human Rights and Rule of Law are preparing an assessment of draft laws concerning the judicial system and the status of judges in Ukraine.

Announcements
Ukrainian advocates invited to Bonn for internship
Young Ukrainian advocates specializing in civil, commercial, and economic law have the opportunity to participate in an internship program in Germany. The program is organized by the International Legal Cooperation Foundation (IRZ) in cooperation with the Federal Bar Association and the German Bar Association.

Legislation
Declarations of integrity for judges and others: BCU approves conclusions on draft laws
Under the guise of restoring trust in the judiciary, repressive mechanisms of control over it may be introduced. This directly contradicts international experience and may lead to the degradation of the Ukrainian justice system.

Court practice
Automatic extension of detention violates the right to defense, - says Constitutional Court
The obstacles to access to court and the violation of the right to be heard in court for a person in such an important matter as the extension of the term of detention, established by the provisions of the CPC, mean that it is impossible to exercise the right to defense guaranteed by part two of Article 63 of the Constitution.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…