Reimbursement of expenses for legal services in court proceedings: from theory to practice

Educational events
13:28 Mon 21.07.25 168 Reviews
Print

What are the pros and cons of claiming reimbursement of legal fees in court proceedings, what documents need to be submitted, how to object to the recovery of such costs, and when can the court reduce the amount?

These issues were discussed by advocates during a webinar organized by the Bar Council of Ivano-Frankivsk Region in cooperation with the regional representative of the UNBA NextGen Lilia Ivanchuk. Advocate Daria Tarasenko was invited to speak at the event.

The speaker reminded that, according to paragraph 14 of the Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (CMCE) to member states on measures facilitating access to justice (on measures facilitating access to justice) No. R(81)7, except in special circumstances, the winning party should, in principle, be reimbursed by the losing party for the costs and expenses, including lawyers' fees, which it has reasonably incurred in connection with the proceedings.

The procedure for recovering costs related to legal assistance provided by an advocate is provided for in Article 134 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, Article 137 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and Article 126 of the Code of Commercial Procedure. The Administrative Court of Cassation in case No. 240/32993/23 noted (decision of 23.01.2025) that the purpose of recovering legal aid costs is not only to compensate the party in whose favor the decision was made for the losses incurred, but also, in a certain sense, to encourage the authority to refrain from actions that would subsequently necessitate the restoration of the violated rights and interests of individuals and legal entities in the sphere of public law relations.

Restoring financial justice for the client, preventing future violations of the law by the defendant, and encouraging the defendant to resolve the dispute before the court renders a decision are, in the speaker's opinion, the arguments that an advocate should use when deciding whether to recover the costs of legal assistance provided to the client from the opponent. Of course, it is possible that the case will be delayed and the court decision will take effect. Additional time will also be needed to prepare the necessary documents, and the client may be disappointed by the court's reduction of the amount of compensation.

At the same time, a claim for reimbursement of the costs of legal services may be made in the statement of claim (for the defendant in the response to the statement of claim, and for a third party in written explanations. To do this, the following must be submitted to the court:

  • contract with the advocate;
  • addendum to the contract specifying the amount of the fee (if the contract itself does not contain such a condition);
  • description of the work (services provided) performed by the advocate (not required for a fixed fee, according to the practice of the Supreme Court).

It is also recommended to submit an invoice for the lawyer's services and a receipt for payment of the lawyer's services.

It is possible to object to the recovery of costs in full on the grounds of the absence of the necessary documents and the untimeliness of the claim.

A statement requesting a reduction in the amount of compensation must contain a justification as to why the amount of the claimed expenses is disproportionate to the complexity of the case, the value of the claim, the volume of materials in the case, the number of procedural documents prepared, the number of hearings, the duration of the court proceedings, etc.

In case of non-compliance with the requirements of part five of Article 134 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, the court may reduce the amount of legal aid costs to be distributed between the parties, but only at the request of the other party, which is obliged to prove that the costs are disproportionate to the services provided by the advocate.

However, in practice, courts are increasingly taking the initiative to reduce the reimbursement of costs related to the provision of legal assistance by an advocate and which are recovered in favor of the party whose claims have been satisfied by the court, noted D. Tarasenko. In her opinion, such actions of the court are contrary to the law, as noted by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 755/9215/15-ц (decision of 19.02.2020): it is the interested party who must take certain actions aimed at recovering the costs of professional legal assistance from the other party, and the other party has the right to raise appropriate objections to such claims, which excludes the court's initiative to recover the costs of professional legal assistance from one of the parties without appropriate action on the part of that party.

The speaker provided practical advice to the audience on how to claim reimbursement of legal aid costs, explained the specifics of recovery in appeal and cassation proceedings, provided samples of procedural documents, and links to relevant court decisions.

Popular news

DIC and customs control: advocates warn against the risks of draft law No. 13421

Legislation

DIC and customs control: advocates warn against the risks of draft law No. 13421

Ukrainian defense companies face bureaucratic delays in importing components, which could critically affect the timing of government contracts. At the same time, the mechanism proposed in the Verkhovna Rada creates risks that could outweigh the potential benefits for the industry.

16:58 Mon 11.08.25 100
Partnership for reconstruction: UNBA discusses new law on PPPs

Discussion

Partnership for reconstruction: UNBA discusses new law on PPPs

Public-private partnerships are considered one of the key tools for Ukraine's recovery, but in practice, their mechanisms remain complex, poorly understood, and often ineffective.

16:31 Thu 07.08.25 118
Defended police officers — ended up in the army: advocate mobilized while performing his duties

Guarantees of the practice of law

Defended police officers — ended up in the army: advocate mobilized while performing his duties

An advocate specializing in defending the rights of law enforcement officers and who had repeatedly won cases against the police was mobilized while performing his professional duties. The day before, a report appeared in the Oberig registry stating that he had violated military registration rules, and his current deferral was canceled. The advocate was detained, taken to the TCC and the SS, beaten and sent to a military unit.

17:54 Wed 06.08.25 143
The BCU has begun accepting documents from candidates for the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the HQCJ

Announcements

The BCU has begun accepting documents from candidates for the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the HQCJ

The Bar Council of Ukraine announces the start of accepting documents from candidates who wish to be elected to the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges under the BCU quota.

16:38 Fri 25.07.25 155
Venice Commission warned of risks of changes to disciplinary procedures for Ukrainian judges

Legislation

Venice Commission warned of risks of changes to disciplinary procedures for Ukrainian judges

The European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) and the Council of Europe Directorate for Human Rights and Rule of Law are preparing an assessment of draft laws concerning the judicial system and the status of judges in Ukraine.

16:04 Fri 25.07.25 178
Ukrainian advocates invited to Bonn for internship

Announcements

Ukrainian advocates invited to Bonn for internship

Young Ukrainian advocates specializing in civil, commercial, and economic law have the opportunity to participate in an internship program in Germany. The program is organized by the International Legal Cooperation Foundation (IRZ) in cooperation with the Federal Bar Association and the German Bar Association.

12:46 Fri 25.07.25 154
Declarations of integrity for judges and others: BCU approves conclusions on draft laws

Legislation

Declarations of integrity for judges and others: BCU approves conclusions on draft laws

Under the guise of restoring trust in the judiciary, repressive mechanisms of control over it may be introduced. This directly contradicts international experience and may lead to the degradation of the Ukrainian justice system.

12:26 Fri 25.07.25 186
Automatic extension of detention violates the right to defense, - says Constitutional Court

Court practice

Automatic extension of detention violates the right to defense, - says Constitutional Court

The obstacles to access to court and the violation of the right to be heard in court for a person in such an important matter as the extension of the term of detention, established by the provisions of the CPC, mean that it is impossible to exercise the right to defense guaranteed by part two of Article 63 of the Constitution.

13:12 Thu 24.07.25 115

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл