Reimbursement of expenses for legal services in court proceedings: from theory to practice

Educational events
13:28 Mon 21.07.25 80 Reviews
Print

What are the pros and cons of claiming reimbursement of legal fees in court proceedings, what documents need to be submitted, how to object to the recovery of such costs, and when can the court reduce the amount?

These issues were discussed by advocates during a webinar organized by the Bar Council of Ivano-Frankivsk Region in cooperation with the regional representative of the UNBA NextGen Lilia Ivanchuk. Advocate Daria Tarasenko was invited to speak at the event.

The speaker reminded that, according to paragraph 14 of the Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe (CMCE) to member states on measures facilitating access to justice (on measures facilitating access to justice) No. R(81)7, except in special circumstances, the winning party should, in principle, be reimbursed by the losing party for the costs and expenses, including lawyers' fees, which it has reasonably incurred in connection with the proceedings.

The procedure for recovering costs related to legal assistance provided by an advocate is provided for in Article 134 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, Article 137 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and Article 126 of the Code of Commercial Procedure. The Administrative Court of Cassation in case No. 240/32993/23 noted (decision of 23.01.2025) that the purpose of recovering legal aid costs is not only to compensate the party in whose favor the decision was made for the losses incurred, but also, in a certain sense, to encourage the authority to refrain from actions that would subsequently necessitate the restoration of the violated rights and interests of individuals and legal entities in the sphere of public law relations.

Restoring financial justice for the client, preventing future violations of the law by the defendant, and encouraging the defendant to resolve the dispute before the court renders a decision are, in the speaker's opinion, the arguments that an advocate should use when deciding whether to recover the costs of legal assistance provided to the client from the opponent. Of course, it is possible that the case will be delayed and the court decision will take effect. Additional time will also be needed to prepare the necessary documents, and the client may be disappointed by the court's reduction of the amount of compensation.

At the same time, a claim for reimbursement of the costs of legal services may be made in the statement of claim (for the defendant in the response to the statement of claim, and for a third party in written explanations. To do this, the following must be submitted to the court:

  • contract with the advocate;
  • addendum to the contract specifying the amount of the fee (if the contract itself does not contain such a condition);
  • description of the work (services provided) performed by the advocate (not required for a fixed fee, according to the practice of the Supreme Court).

It is also recommended to submit an invoice for the lawyer's services and a receipt for payment of the lawyer's services.

It is possible to object to the recovery of costs in full on the grounds of the absence of the necessary documents and the untimeliness of the claim.

A statement requesting a reduction in the amount of compensation must contain a justification as to why the amount of the claimed expenses is disproportionate to the complexity of the case, the value of the claim, the volume of materials in the case, the number of procedural documents prepared, the number of hearings, the duration of the court proceedings, etc.

In case of non-compliance with the requirements of part five of Article 134 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, the court may reduce the amount of legal aid costs to be distributed between the parties, but only at the request of the other party, which is obliged to prove that the costs are disproportionate to the services provided by the advocate.

However, in practice, courts are increasingly taking the initiative to reduce the reimbursement of costs related to the provision of legal assistance by an advocate and which are recovered in favor of the party whose claims have been satisfied by the court, noted D. Tarasenko. In her opinion, such actions of the court are contrary to the law, as noted by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 755/9215/15-ц (decision of 19.02.2020): it is the interested party who must take certain actions aimed at recovering the costs of professional legal assistance from the other party, and the other party has the right to raise appropriate objections to such claims, which excludes the court's initiative to recover the costs of professional legal assistance from one of the parties without appropriate action on the part of that party.

The speaker provided practical advice to the audience on how to claim reimbursement of legal aid costs, explained the specifics of recovery in appeal and cassation proceedings, provided samples of procedural documents, and links to relevant court decisions.

Popular news

Ukrainian advocacy integrates HELP into the system of professional development

Educational events

Ukrainian advocacy integrates HELP into the system of professional development

In recent years, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has become one of the Council of Europe’s key partners in implementing the HELP programme, an educational project aimed at developing the legal profession through training in European human rights standards.

12:38 Tue 22.07.25 218
Those who equate advocates with clients will be fined – law passed

Legislation

Those who equate advocates with clients will be fined – law passed

Public identification of an advocate with a client to whom such advocate provides professional legal assistance will become an administrative offense, and forms of interference in the activities of an advocate, for which liability is provided for in Article 397 of the Criminal Code, are detailed.

19:32 Wed 16.07.25 243
Experts have exceptional potential that should be developed jointly — Lidiya Izovitova

Discussion

Experts have exceptional potential that should be developed jointly — Lidiya Izovitova

The professions of advocate and expert can and must develop by learning from each other, exchanging experience and best practices. Together, we can build a strong, independent, and effective justice system worthy of a European Ukraine.

17:03 Fri 11.07.25 134
Strengthening the country's sovereignty requires a new model for forming the HQCJ – round table

Discussion

Strengthening the country's sovereignty requires a new model for forming the HQCJ – round table

The model of the competition commission for selecting members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges, introduced as an anti-crisis measure, has exhausted itself. The inaction of the HCJ in forming a new composition of the CC, the lack of accountability, and the existing signs of political influence indicate that powers should be transferred directly to the entities responsible for forming the HQCJ as defined by law.

10:41 Thu 10.07.25 142
UNBA Committee reviews new cases of violence against advocates in TCC

Guarantees of the practice of law

UNBA Committee reviews new cases of violence against advocates in TCC

New facts of physical violence, obstruction of access to clients, as well as sabotage of investigations in cases involving lawyers were considered by the UNBA Committee on the Protection of Lawyers' Rights and Guarantees of the Legal Profession during its last meeting.

16:34 Tue 08.07.25 115
One third of complaints to the UNBA are due to unlawful actions by the TCC

Guarantees of the practice of law

One third of complaints to the UNBA are due to unlawful actions by the TCC

In the first half of 2025, the Committee for the protection of lawyers' rights and guarantees of advocacy of the Ukrainian National Bar Association recorded 46 complaints of violations of professional rights. A third of these concerned unlawful actions by territorial recruitment centers—systematic obstruction of advocacy or violation of the right to defense.

14:21 Wed 02.07.25 159
SSU official letter about «dangerous» advocacy turned out to be fake

Guarantees of the practice of law

SSU official letter about «dangerous» advocacy turned out to be fake

The Security Service of Ukraine has officially denied the authenticity of a document that allegedly described threatening trends in the development of the advocacy profession. The text, which was previously published on a little-known website and distributed on Telegram channels, is not an official letter from the SSU.

11:48 Thu 26.06.25 104
The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Self-government

The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

17:18 Mon 23.06.25 175

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл