The Venice Commission confirmed the risks of removing judges, which the BCU had warned about
 
                                                            The European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) and the Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law (DGI) of the Council of Europe warned Ukraine about the risk of abuse associated with the possibility of temporarily suspending a judge during disciplinary proceedings.
The European institutions examined draft laws No. 13137, No. 13137-1, and No. 13165-2 on amendments to the Law «On the judicial system and status of judges» and other legislative acts concerning the improvement of disciplinary procedures and declarations of integrity of judges and family ties of judges, and adopted a joint conclusion No. CDL-AD(2025)044 as a result of their analysis.
According to the proposed amendments, a judge may be temporarily suspended during disciplinary proceedings for up to two months, with the possibility of extension for another two months.
Earlier, the President of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, the Bar Council of Ukraine Lidiya Izovitova warned the Venice Commission and the DGI about the dangerous consequences of such changes during consultations.
In particular, she voiced the position of BCU that, according to the drafts, the mechanisms of criminal proceedings are unjustifiably transferred to disciplinary proceedings, where there are no risks to society a priori. It also creates a basis for manipulation, where disciplinary complaints can be used to remove «inconvenient» judges, creating an atmosphere of fear among judges. On these grounds, the bar self-government body concluded that the changes are conceptually unjustified and systemically dangerous for independent justice. Therefore, the application of repressive measures to a judge even before the fact of a violation has been established is contrary to the presumption of innocence and the principle of proportionality. Such changes transform the legal system from an instrument of justice into a mechanism of control.
In their conclusion, the Venice Commission and the DGI drew attention to the shortcomings of the drafts, in particular the duplication of regulations, and recommended harmonizing the rules on temporary suspension in various laws, as well as within the Law «On the High Council of Justice».
European institutions also warned of the risk of abuse during the temporary suspension of a judge. «Such a measure could be used improperly, even to change the composition of the court that is to hear the case, - the conclusion states. - Therefore, given the risk of misuse, the Venice Commission and the DGI do not recommend introducing this procedure in the form in which it is proposed in the draft amendments».
Popular news
 
                                                                            
                Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
 
                                                                            
                Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
 
                                                                            
                Legislation
UNBA warned about the risks of uncoordinated changes regarding incapacitated persons
The Ukrainian National Bar Association supports the idea of strengthening guarantees for persons declared legally incompetent by a court, but warns against adopting changes that are not coordinated with each other. To ensure real, rather than declarative, protection of rights, a systematic review of the provisions of the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure is necessary.
 
                                                                            
                Self-government
BCU condemned information attacks on advocacy
Bar Council of Ukraine strongly condemned the coordinated campaign to discredit advocacy, in particular the leadership of the Odessa region bar association. Protecting colleagues from manipulation and misrepresentation became a separate item on the agenda of the BCU meeting on October 17–18.
 
                                                                            
                URAU
Six new advocates appear in Ukraine every day — statistics
There are almost 72,100 advocates in Ukraine. Since the end of May alone, 791 advocates have joined the national defense institute — on average, six advocates per day receive a certificate of entitlement to practice as an advocate.
 
                                                                            
                Self-government
Approaches to remuneration of advocates in the FLA system must change – L. Izovitova
Payments to advocates in the free legal aid system are made after court proceedings are completed and can take years. During this time, advocates provide protection without payment, essentially lending money to the state. This practice contradicts Article 43 of the Constitution.
 
                                                                            
                Self-government
The BCU holds its October meeting in Lviv region
The Bar Council of Ukraine is starting its next two-day meeting today, 17 October. Items on the agenda include issues relating to the activities of bar self-government bodies, the implementation of the institution's tasks and interaction, and the consideration of requests for clarification.
 
                                                                            
                Legislation
Recodification of the Civil Code: UNBA submitted comments and proposals
Although the adoption of the Civil Code in 2003 was a defining moment in the development of national private law, the rapid development of social relations, the emergence of new technologies, and regulatory acts necessitated a systematic update of the general provisions of civil legislation.
Publications
 
    
    Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
 
    
    Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
 
    
    Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
 
    
    Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
 
    
    Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
 
    
    Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
 
    
    Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
 
    
    Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
 
                 
                    
                 
                         
                         
                        