How should an advocate act if a relative works in the police: clarification from the BCU regarding conflicts of interest
In villages and small towns, advocates often find themselves in situations where their relatives work in institutions related to the justice system. As a result, advocates may sometimes lose their practice, and citizens may be deprived of their right to freely choose a defense advocate.
Advocate Rostislav Pavliuk asked the Ukrainian National Bar Association to explain how to deal with a possible conflict of interest. His son works as a criminal investigator at the local police department and is involved as an expert in various criminal investigations. At the same time, the advocate does not have information about the specific cases in which his son is involved. It is only possible to find out this information by reviewing the materials of the criminal proceedings in accordance with Article 290 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In this regard, the advocate expressed concern that his conclusion of contracts for the provision of legal assistance in criminal proceedings could be considered a violation of paragraph 5 of part 1 of Article 28 of the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law».
According to this provision, an advocate is prohibited from concluding a contract for the provision of legal assistance and is obliged to refuse to perform it if he or she is a family member or close relative of an official who has participated or is participating in economic, civil, or administrative proceedings, criminal proceedings, or the consideration of an administrative offense case, in relation to which the advocate is approached with a proposal to conclude a contract for the provision of legal assistance.
The advocate noted that, among other things, in such circumstances, the right of a person to freely choose a defense lawyer may also be restricted.
The issue was considered at a meeting of the Bar Council of Ukraine, which is being held on October 17-18 in the village of Plavya, Lviv region.
During the discussion, members of the Bar Council of Ukraine expressed the opinion that the mere fact of concluding an agreement by an advocate cannot be regarded as a disciplinary violation if he was not aware of his relative's participation in a specific criminal proceeding. At the same time, once an advocate becomes aware that a close relative has participated in the proceedings as a specialist, they must terminate the contract for the provision of legal assistance.
In order to ensure a balance between compliance with professional standards of legal practice and the right of a person to freely choose a defense attorney, the Bar Council of Ukraine, following a discussion of the issue, recommended that advocates in such situations inform their clients of a potential conflict of interest that may arise as a result of family ties. In the event of an actual conflict, the provisions of paragraph 5 of part 1 of Article 28 of the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law» shall apply.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Preparations for the ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer are in the final stages
On June 9, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a working meeting to prepare for the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. The Ministry of Justice and the Ukrainian National Bar Association agreed on approaches to draft laws regarding the ratification and implementation of the Convention. Participants have been given 10 days to prepare the draft laws that will be submitted for consideration.
Announcements
Internships at German law firms: IRZ is accepting applications from Ukrainians
In 2026, the German Foundation for International Legal Cooperation (IRZ) plans to organize a multilateral internship program for young advocates from partner countries. Participants will attend an introductory seminar in Bonn and complete internships at law firms in Germany.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Restrictions on the right to legal assistance in pretrial detention centers are unacceptable – statement by the BCU
The Bar Council of Ukraine has stated that it is unacceptable to restrict the right to professional legal assistance, the guarantees of legal practice, and the confidentiality of communications between advocates and clients in pretrial detention facilities operated by the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine.
European integration
The UNBA presented the CCBE with an overview of legal reform and challenges
Reform of the legal profession, Ukraine’s European integration commitments, guarantees of the profession’s independence, and practices of bar self-governance in European countries — these issues were the subject of discussion at the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA is compiling the findings of the subgroups regarding the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap
Today, May 28, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the Coordination Bureau of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding the reform of the advocacy profession. Following a series of meetings by thematic subgroups, the work is now moving to the stage of consolidating proposals and preparing a coordinated package of recommendations.
Discussion
UNBA discussed removing barriers at border crossings for families with children with disabilities
Families of children with disabilities face additional requirements when traveling abroad, particularly regarding consular registration. What is happening and what changes are needed to remove these obstacles were discussed during the roundtable «Borders without barriers for families of children with disabilities».
Discussion
New rules, old problems: the UNBA discussed the work of the ETAIDF and MMC
The reform of medical-social assessment and military medical commissions has changed procedures but has not resolved practical issues. People face situations where documents are not issued, decisions are based on technicalities, assessments are delayed, and they struggle to demonstrate their actual health status in specific life situations.
Discussion
Co-parenting shouldn't be reduced to a 50/50 formula, — roundtable discussion
Following a divorce, joint custody can serve as a mechanism for ensuring equal parental rights. However, this model requires clear criteria and cannot be applied automatically without taking into account the child’s age, the level of conflict between the parents, the risk of violence, and the feasibility of enforcing the future decision.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates