How should an advocate act if a relative works in the police: clarification from the BCU regarding conflicts of interest

Professional Conduct
10:29 Sat 18.10.25 389 Reviews
Print

In villages and small towns, advocates often find themselves in situations where their relatives work in institutions related to the justice system. As a result, advocates may sometimes lose their practice, and citizens may be deprived of their right to freely choose a defense advocate.

Advocate Rostislav Pavliuk asked the Ukrainian National Bar Association to explain how to deal with a possible conflict of interest. His son works as a criminal investigator at the local police department and is involved as an expert in various criminal investigations. At the same time, the advocate does not have information about the specific cases in which his son is involved. It is only possible to find out this information by reviewing the materials of the criminal proceedings in accordance with Article 290 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

In this regard, the advocate expressed concern that his conclusion of contracts for the provision of legal assistance in criminal proceedings could be considered a violation of paragraph 5 of part 1 of Article 28 of the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law».

According to this provision, an advocate is prohibited from concluding a contract for the provision of legal assistance and is obliged to refuse to perform it if he or she is a family member or close relative of an official who has participated or is participating in economic, civil, or administrative proceedings, criminal proceedings, or the consideration of an administrative offense case, in relation to which the advocate is approached with a proposal to conclude a contract for the provision of legal assistance.

The advocate noted that, among other things, in such circumstances, the right of a person to freely choose a defense lawyer may also be restricted.

The issue was considered at a meeting of the Bar Council of Ukraine, which is being held on October 17-18 in the village of Plavya, Lviv region.

During the discussion, members of the Bar Council of Ukraine expressed the opinion that the mere fact of concluding an agreement by an advocate cannot be regarded as a disciplinary violation if he was not aware of his relative's participation in a specific criminal proceeding. At the same time, once an advocate becomes aware that a close relative has participated in the proceedings as a specialist, they must terminate the contract for the provision of legal assistance.

In order to ensure a balance between compliance with professional standards of legal practice and the right of a person to freely choose a defense attorney, the Bar Council of Ukraine, following a discussion of the issue, recommended that advocates in such situations inform their clients of a potential conflict of interest that may arise as a result of family ties. In the event of an actual conflict, the provisions of paragraph 5 of part 1 of Article 28 of the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law» shall apply.

Popular news

UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts

Legislation

UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts

International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.

14:34 Wed 07.01.26 186
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?

Legislation

How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?

The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».

15:35 Tue 06.01.26 167
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy

Legislation

Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy

The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.

19:31 Fri 02.01.26 152
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny

Legislation

Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny

Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.

19:13 Fri 02.01.26 141
Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy

Legislation

Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy

The general approach to working on the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law in terms of reforming advocacy should not be based on «slogans», but rather on gathering facts, comparing them with standards, consulting with the professional community, and formulating norms for which participants are prepared to take responsibility.

18:41 Fri 02.01.26 121
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting

Legislation

Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting

On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.

18:24 Fri 02.01.26 139
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference

Self-government

BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference

The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.

14:21 Wed 31.12.25 224
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published

Self-government

UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published

In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.

14:56 Tue 23.12.25 183

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл