BCU will request that rooms for advocates to work in be created in all TCC
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the General Staff of the Armed Forces and the Ministry of Defense with a request to set up separate premises for advocates to work in all territorial recruitment and social support centers.
This decision was made during a meeting of the BCU on October 18 in response to systematic violations of the professional rights of advocates. The issue was brought up for consideration by the chairman of the Bar Council of Kharkiv Region Viktoria Gayvoronska, who drew her colleagues' attention to the scale of the problem and the need for urgent action.
Advocate self-government bodies throughout Ukraine have recorded numerous cases of interference in the activities of advocates by representatives of the TCC. Among the most common violations are ignoring advocate requests, denying advocates access to premises for meetings with clients, and in the worst cases, intimidation, detention, and even the use of physical force. These incidents demonstrate not only a disregard for the guarantees of lawyers' activities, but also a violation of fundamental human rights, in particular the constitutional right to legal assistance and protection.
Although some regions have managed to establish constructive cooperation with the TCC, the problem remains nationwide. Not all regional advocate councils that have independently attempted to resolve this issue locally have been able to agree on appropriate cooperation. Moreover, even where premises for advocates formally exist, lawyers are often simply not allowed to enter them. The problem lies not only in creating an appropriate space for the provision of professional legal assistance, but also in ensuring real access to it for both advocates and conscripts.
During the discussion at the BCU meeting, particular attention was paid to the need to develop a clear algorithm for interaction between advocates and TCC employees. Often, a confidential meeting between an advocate and a client is mistakenly perceived by TCC representatives as an attempt to interfere with the mobilization procedure or even to evade it. In fact, the right of an advocate to communicate with a client does not legally interfere with mobilization activities. Advocates do not interfere with the process — they ensure its legality and protect the rights of individuals. However, the lack of clear rules leads to conflicts that could be avoided if there were clear procedures in place.
BCU has chosen a balanced strategy that combines regional dialogue with centralized support. Issues of cooperation should be resolved primarily at the local level — through direct contacts between regional bar councils and the TCC in their regions. At the same time, an official appeal by the BCU to the central law enforcement agencies will have a coordinating effect and strengthen the position of the regions in negotiations.
Members of the Bar Council of Ukraine unanimously supported two practical steps to solve the problem. First, the BCU will officially appeal to the Ministry of Defense and the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with a request to equip all TCCs with separate rooms for advocates to work and to ensure unhindered access to these premises for both advocates and conscripts. The key requirement is to guarantee the confidentiality of communication between advocates and their clients. Second, a practical guide will be prepared for advocates with clear rules for conducting confidential meetings at TCCs. This document will help minimize conflict situations and ensure effective protection of clients' rights within the framework of current legislation.
Popular news
Announcements
Internships at German law firms: IRZ is accepting applications from Ukrainians
In 2026, the German Foundation for International Legal Cooperation (IRZ) plans to organize a multilateral internship program for young advocates from partner countries. Participants will attend an introductory seminar in Bonn and complete internships at law firms in Germany.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Restrictions on the right to legal assistance in pretrial detention centers are unacceptable – statement by the BCU
The Bar Council of Ukraine has stated that it is unacceptable to restrict the right to professional legal assistance, the guarantees of legal practice, and the confidentiality of communications between advocates and clients in pretrial detention facilities operated by the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine.
European integration
The UNBA presented the CCBE with an overview of legal reform and challenges
Reform of the legal profession, Ukraine’s European integration commitments, guarantees of the profession’s independence, and practices of bar self-governance in European countries — these issues were the subject of discussion at the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA is compiling the findings of the subgroups regarding the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap
Today, May 28, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the Coordination Bureau of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding the reform of the advocacy profession. Following a series of meetings by thematic subgroups, the work is now moving to the stage of consolidating proposals and preparing a coordinated package of recommendations.
Discussion
UNBA discussed removing barriers at border crossings for families with children with disabilities
Families of children with disabilities face additional requirements when traveling abroad, particularly regarding consular registration. What is happening and what changes are needed to remove these obstacles were discussed during the roundtable «Borders without barriers for families of children with disabilities».
Discussion
New rules, old problems: the UNBA discussed the work of the ETAIDF and MMC
The reform of medical-social assessment and military medical commissions has changed procedures but has not resolved practical issues. People face situations where documents are not issued, decisions are based on technicalities, assessments are delayed, and they struggle to demonstrate their actual health status in specific life situations.
Discussion
Co-parenting shouldn't be reduced to a 50/50 formula, — roundtable discussion
Following a divorce, joint custody can serve as a mechanism for ensuring equal parental rights. However, this model requires clear criteria and cannot be applied automatically without taking into account the child’s age, the level of conflict between the parents, the risk of violence, and the feasibility of enforcing the future decision.
Legislation
Penalties for errors in military registration require clear rules, – UNBA
The liability of officials for violations of military registration rules must be legally defined, proportionate, and effectively enforceable. Otherwise, the new fines will not protect citizens from registration errors but will create additional risks.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates