BCU: training advocates is not a function of a state institution
Transferring the functions of improving the professional level of advocates to a state institution within the justice system would contradict international and European standards, which assign the organization of continuing education for advocates to the competence of professional associations of advocates.
This conclusion was reached by the Bar Council of Ukraine following a review of the analytical note by the National Institute for Strategic Studies (hereinafter referred to as NISS) «Training of qualified personnel for the justice system as implementation of the provisions of the Roadmap on the rule of law» on the possibility of including advocacy as «part» the National School of Justice of Ukraine and transferring to this state institution the functions of organizing and administering the professional development of advocates. The decision of the BCU dated 12.12.2025 No. 130 was published on the website of the UNBA.
The BCU noted that Ukraine has already established and is operating a complete, internally coordinated system for improving the professional level of advocates, which is organized by bar self-government bodies, not state bodies. And this system is fully consistent with the provisions of international standards in this professional field.
The basic principles concerning the role of advocates, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (Havana, Cuba, August 27-September 7, 1990), provide for the right of advocates to establish and join self-governing professional associations, which, in particular, should promote the continuing education and professional development of advocates and protect their professional independence.
Recommendation No. R(2000)21 of the Committee of Ministers to the member states of the Council of Europe on the freedom to practice law emphasizes the need for independent professional associations of advocates that establish and maintain professional standards, including in the field of training and professional development.
The documents of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), in particular the Charter of Fundamental Principles of the European Legal Profession, emphasize that only a strong element of self-regulation can ensure the real independence of advocacy from the state. The organization of professional education for advocates by their professional associations is an integral part of this self-regulation.
In particular, the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer, adopted on March 12, 2025, in paragraph d of Article 4, established the obligation of states to ensure that professional associations have the opportunity to promote access to the profession, continuing professional education, and the professional development of advocates.
Transferring the functions of organizing and administering the professional development of advocates to a state institution would contradict Articles 59 and 131-2 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which guarantee the independence of advocacy and establish that the principles of its organization and activities are determined exclusively by law.
Such a model would violate the legally enshrined guarantees of bar self-government as a state-guaranteed right of advocates to independently decide on the organization and activities of advocacy, including issues of professional education and professional development.
«An advocate is not an official of a state body, but an independent professional entity acting in the interests of the client, not the state. Therefore, the mechanical inclusion of advocates in the «state school of justice» alongside judges and prosecutors blurs the constitutionally important line between state bodies and civil society institutions and creates institutional dependence of advocacy on the bodies with which advocates must compete in the process (the court, the prosecutor's office)», - the decision states.
On this basis, the BCU decided to inform the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine that the Ukrainian advocacy cannot be included in the structure of the National School of Justice of Ukraine as its component, either organizationally or functionally, as this would contradict the constitutionally guaranteed independence of advocacy and the principle of advocacy self-government.
It was also recognized that the model proposed in the NISD analytical note for the creation of a single state institution, the «National School of Justice of Ukraine», which would provide special training for judges, prosecutors, and advocates, does not comply with the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law «On advocacy and the practice of law», and contradicts international and European standards regarding the organization of the legal profession and the system of legal education.
A letter was also sent to the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, and the Office of the President of Ukraine demanding that any illegal initiatives and studies that undermine the constitutionally established independence of the Ukrainian bar be stopped.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Self-government
Efforts to develop advocacy must be brought to fruition — A. Misyats
The Ukrainian advocacy profession is currently going through a critical phase. Amid the war, it must ensure the continuity of legal aid, defend the independence of the profession, and improve qualification and disciplinary procedures in accordance with European standards. The work that has been started must be brought to a practical conclusion.
Support
Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA
On September 18, a working meeting was held at the office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with Executive Director of the International Bar Association (IBA) Mark Ellis. The parties discussed the Ukrainian advocacy profession’s participation in European legal processes, the protection of the UNBA’s digital infrastructure, psychological support for advocates and future areas of cooperation.
Educational events
Tax residency of Ukrainians abroad: what matters
The determination of tax residency for Ukrainians who have been living abroad for an extended period depends on the combination of their personal and economic ties to each country. The established status determines the procedure for reporting income, paying taxes and fulfilling CFC reporting obligations.
War
Are Europe's advocacy associations prepared for a potential war? V. Gvozdiy shared lessons from the Ukrainian experience
The continuity of the bar’s self-governance, the protection of professional registries and archives, as well as equal guarantees of employment for advocates, judges, and prosecutors must be enshrined in advance in legislation in the event of war or another emergency.
Legal defence of military personnel
Payments to military personnel require clear and uniform criteria — UNBA Committee
The vagueness of terms in subordinate regulatory acts leads to differing interpretations of the grounds for paying additional compensation to military personnel. The UNBA has proposed harmonizing these acts and establishing transparent criteria for the allocation of funds.
Discussion
Finding them isn't enough: issues surrounding the seizure and return of crypto assets
The technical structure of transactions does not automatically identify the person who controlled the crypto wallet, and courts have reached differing conclusions on whether a digital asset can be seized as physical evidence. So how can one prove ownership of such assets, enforce court orders, and return funds to victims?
Legislation
The UNBA will prepare guidelines on lawyers' requests
By the end of 2026, the UNBA Committee on the prevention of administrative offenses committed against advocates will develop guidelines on drafting advocate inquiries and responding to refusals to provide information. There are also plans to standardize the practice of applying Article 212-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection