BCU: training advocates is not a function of a state institution
Transferring the functions of improving the professional level of advocates to a state institution within the justice system would contradict international and European standards, which assign the organization of continuing education for advocates to the competence of professional associations of advocates.
This conclusion was reached by the Bar Council of Ukraine following a review of the analytical note by the National Institute for Strategic Studies (hereinafter referred to as NISS) «Training of qualified personnel for the justice system as implementation of the provisions of the Roadmap on the rule of law» on the possibility of including advocacy as «part» the National School of Justice of Ukraine and transferring to this state institution the functions of organizing and administering the professional development of advocates. The decision of the BCU dated 12.12.2025 No. 130 was published on the website of the UNBA.
The BCU noted that Ukraine has already established and is operating a complete, internally coordinated system for improving the professional level of advocates, which is organized by bar self-government bodies, not state bodies. And this system is fully consistent with the provisions of international standards in this professional field.
The basic principles concerning the role of advocates, adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (Havana, Cuba, August 27-September 7, 1990), provide for the right of advocates to establish and join self-governing professional associations, which, in particular, should promote the continuing education and professional development of advocates and protect their professional independence.
Recommendation No. R(2000)21 of the Committee of Ministers to the member states of the Council of Europe on the freedom to practice law emphasizes the need for independent professional associations of advocates that establish and maintain professional standards, including in the field of training and professional development.
The documents of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), in particular the Charter of Fundamental Principles of the European Legal Profession, emphasize that only a strong element of self-regulation can ensure the real independence of advocacy from the state. The organization of professional education for advocates by their professional associations is an integral part of this self-regulation.
In particular, the Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate, adopted on March 12, 2025, in paragraph d of Article 4, established the obligation of states to ensure that professional associations have the opportunity to promote access to the profession, continuing professional education, and the professional development of advocates.
Transferring the functions of organizing and administering the professional development of advocates to a state institution would contradict Articles 59 and 131-2 of the Constitution of Ukraine, which guarantee the independence of advocacy and establish that the principles of its organization and activities are determined exclusively by law.
Such a model would violate the legally enshrined guarantees of bar self-government as a state-guaranteed right of advocates to independently decide on the organization and activities of advocacy, including issues of professional education and professional development.
«An advocate is not an official of a state body, but an independent professional entity acting in the interests of the client, not the state. Therefore, the mechanical inclusion of advocates in the «state school of justice» alongside judges and prosecutors blurs the constitutionally important line between state bodies and civil society institutions and creates institutional dependence of advocacy on the bodies with which advocates must compete in the process (the court, the prosecutor's office)», - the decision states.
On this basis, the BCU decided to inform the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine that the Ukrainian advocacy cannot be included in the structure of the National School of Justice of Ukraine as its component, either organizationally or functionally, as this would contradict the constitutionally guaranteed independence of advocacy and the principle of advocacy self-government.
It was also recognized that the model proposed in the NISD analytical note for the creation of a single state institution, the «National School of Justice of Ukraine», which would provide special training for judges, prosecutors, and advocates, does not comply with the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine, the Law «On advocacy and the practice of law», and contradicts international and European standards regarding the organization of the legal profession and the system of legal education.
A letter was also sent to the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, and the Office of the President of Ukraine demanding that any illegal initiatives and studies that undermine the constitutionally established independence of the Ukrainian bar be stopped.
Popular news
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny
Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.
Legislation
Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
The general approach to working on the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law in terms of reforming advocacy should not be based on «slogans», but rather on gathering facts, comparing them with standards, consulting with the professional community, and formulating norms for which participants are prepared to take responsibility.
Legislation
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting
On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.
Self-government
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference
The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.
Self-government
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published
In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.
Publications
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…