The UNBA and the Council of Judges of Ukraine are expanding their professional dialogue

Interaction
12:34 Mon 27.04.26 309 Reviews
Print

On April 24, a working meeting was held between the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova and the Chairman of the Council of Judges of Ukraine Vitaliy Salikhov. Topics discussed included formats for cooperation between bar and judicial self-governing bodies, the development of joint ethical standards, and the formation of a Selection Committee for the recruitment of members of the High Council of Justice.

As a reminder, the meeting was a continuation of the institutional dialogue initiated following the appeal by the BCU to the Council of Judges regarding the observance of constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession. In response, the Council of Judges confirmed the importance of adequately protecting the guarantees of advocacy practice and proposed holding a bilateral working meeting to discuss the issues raised.

The parties paid particular attention to the topic of professional ethics within the justice system. L. Izovitova recalled the attempt to create a joint code of ethics for the three legal professions in 2018. At that time, the BCU, the Council of Judges and the Council of Prosecutors of Ukraine signed a resolution titled «Professional ethics in justice». The document provided for the formation of a coordinating Committee, the creation of a working group to draft a Code of Professional Ethics and define common ethical principles in the justice sector, as well as the conduct of joint training for judges, prosecutors, and advocates on human rights protection and professional ethics. However, this initiative did not yield practical results.

This issue was also the subject of a recent professional discussion organized by the Council of Europe project «Strengthening human rights in the criminal justice system of Ukraine — Phase II». The roundtable «Inter-institutional dialogue on ethical standards and challenges in professions of bodies that are part of or related to the justice system. Common and distinct approaches in disciplinary proceedings of bodies with disciplinary jurisdiction» included Council of Europe consultants, members of parliament, the Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights and representatives of the Ethics Council and the Supreme Court. The UNBA was represented at the event by L. Izovitova, her deputy Valentin Gvozdiy and the acting chairman of the High Qualification Commission of Advocates Andriy Misyats.

The view was expressed that a common ethical document for various legal professions is possible primarily at the level of general principles — the rule of law, legality, independence, respect for human rights, and the proper performance of professional duties. At the level of specific rules of conduct and disciplinary liability, these professions have different legal natures. That is why, as emphasized during the meeting, further work on ethical standards must take into account differences in constitutional functions, professional duties, and the substantive content of guarantees of independence.

Another issue discussed at the working meeting was overcoming the staffing crisis in the courts and forming a Selection Committee to conduct a competition for the position of member of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine. L. Izovitova emphasized that, to date, the Competition Commission has not been formed in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 95-1 of the Law of Ukraine «On the judicial system and the status of judges». This is not only a procedural issue but also a matter of the proper functioning of judicial governance mechanisms, since without a formed Competition Commission, it is impossible to ensure the further selection of HQCJ members in the manner prescribed by law.

Lidiya Izovitova reported that in accordance with Article 95-1 of the Law of Ukraine «On the judicial system and the status of judges», the Bar Council of Ukraine, as one of the entities responsible for forming the Competition Commission, proposed three candidates for consideration by the High Council of Justice in August 2025. However, the relevant procedure at the High Council of Justice remains unfinished.

In turn, V. Salikhov noted that addressing the shortage of personnel in the courts is a priority task for the judiciary, and the Council of Judges of Ukraine will make every effort to achieve this within the scope of its authority.

Following the discussion, the parties agreed to begin preparations for signing a memorandum of cooperation between the BCU and the Council of Judges of Ukraine. To this end, relevant working groups will be established to develop areas for further cooperation.

Also participating in the meeting were deputy chairman of the Council of Judges of Ukraine Volodymyr Sokolov, secretary of the Council of Judges of Ukraine Tetiana Hrebeniuk and head of the Secretariat of the UNBA Vadym Krasnyk.

Popular news

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Greetings

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.

19:43 Thu 16.07.26 112
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

Legislation

The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.

14:26 Thu 09.07.26 111
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.

12:28 Fri 03.07.26 165
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

Discussion

The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.

10:27 Wed 01.07.26 107
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

Legislation

The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.

15:54 Tue 30.06.26 183
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

Interaction

A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.

16:59 Fri 26.06.26 252
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

Court practice

Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.

12:03 Mon 22.06.26 121
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

Court practice

Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.

18:22 Fri 19.06.26 239

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл