Lidiya Izovitova: In the context of European integration reforms, advocacy is a partner of the state, not a target of reform
The war has significantly altered the working conditions for advocates, while European integration has presented the profession with new institutional challenges. The ongoing negotiation process covers issues such as the rule of law, judicial independence, fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security.
The President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova spoke about the Ukrainian advocacy profession in Cluster 1 — caught between the war and the European choice — during the II International Lawyers’ Forum «Kharkiv Unbreakable – 2026», which is taking place simultaneously in several Ukrainian cities on May 14–15.
The event was organized by the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University, the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Kharkiv Regional Bar Association.
L. Izovitova noted that organizing the forum amid the ongoing war is a statement by the professional community of its commitment to the rule of law and human rights. In Kharkiv, it is particularly evident that the rule of law is a matter of protecting specific individuals — military personnel, civilians, prisoners of war and those missing in action, IDPs, and victims of war crimes.
According to the President of the UNBA, BCU, the Ukrainian legal profession currently operates in two dimensions. The first is linked to the war, war crimes, the defense of military personnel, and assistance to those who have lost their homes, health, or loved ones. The second is linked to European integration, the opening of negotiation clusters with the EU, and the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law.
And in the reform of advocacy, which has become part of the negotiation process within Cluster 1 «Foundations of the EU accession process», the UNBA has been designated an equal co-implementer of the relevant tasks alongside the Verkhovna Rada and the Ministry of Justice. Therefore, the bar association acts not as an object of reform, but as a partner of the state, L. Izovitova is convinced.
At the same time, L. Izovitova noted, the Roadmap cannot be interpreted as a mandate to dismantle the current model of advocacy. After all, the current model — a single national professional organization with mandatory membership, a two-tier system of self-governance, and disciplinary bodies formed by the profession itself — is the result of Ukraine’s fulfillment of its obligations to the Council of Europe. Its creation was supported at the time by the Venice Commission and the Council of Europe’s Directorate General of Human Rights and the Rule of Law in a joint opinion. The model was subsequently enshrined in 2012 by the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law» and later in Article 131-2 of the Constitution of Ukraine. The Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, in the drafting of which the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU Valentin Gvozdiy, participated, marked a new level of affirmation of European standards.
Thus, the Roadmap’s objective is the evolutionary improvement, enhancement of transparency, accountability, and effectiveness of the institution without revising constitutional foundations or weakening self-governance. The changes envisaged by the Roadmap should strengthen trust in advocacy but not become a mechanism for state interference in the profession’s internal decisions.
«The Ukrainian advocacy profession is undergoing reform today under unique circumstances. Simultaneously, there is a full-scale war, the technical opening of six negotiation clusters with the EU, and a profound transformation of the justice system, - emphasized the President of the UNBA, BCU. - Under these conditions, advocacy is not a passive entity. It proposes its own program, participates in lawmaking, and co-develops international standards for the protection of the profession».
She also outlined three key tasks for the near future: At the same time, L. Izovitova emphasized the need to uphold fundamental «red lines»: the unity of the profession, membership in the UNBA, genuine self-governance, and the inadmissibility of returning disciplinary powers to the state.
- completion of work on the new draft of the Law on Advocacy, taking into account all the requirements of the Roadmap;
- ratification of the Convention and the nomination of a Ukrainian candidate to the GRAVO Expert Group;
- further digitization of the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine and the «Advocate’s Personal Account» with integration into state registries.
«When we say «Kharkiv is unbreakable» — referring to the city — we are simultaneously saying this about the profession. About the legal profession, which in Ukraine has proven strong enough to prevent neither war nor political manipulation from destroying the foundation of the rule of law», - concluded the President of the UNBA, BCU.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ombudsman calls for a firm response to violence against advocates
Every instance of obstruction of an advocate’s lawful activities, use of physical force, delaying an investigation, or concealment of evidence must be subject to a proper legal assessment. The state is obligated to ensure that the right to a defense is a genuine guarantee.
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Discussion
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture
To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Court practice
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026
During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates