UNBA appeals to SJA and Prosecutor General regarding inadmissibility of restrictions on access to court decisions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association appealed to the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine and the Office of the Prosecutor General regarding the inadmissibility of unjustified restriction of access to court decisions based on requests of prosecutors.
This is stated in the decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine (hereinafter - BCU) dated October 15, 2020.
The issue concerns the secrecy by prosecutors of prosecutors` offices of court decisions in 2019 - 2020 and their execution. There are 36,827 copies of court decisions, to which access is limited. Information about this was received in response to a request addressed to Kholodniuk Z.V, the head of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine.
According to the response, the administrator of the Unified State Register of Judgments - the State Enterprise "Information Judicial Systems", - limited viewing in the Register in full and public access the court decisions on the basis of requests filed by prosecutors, namely: from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 - up to 4308 electronic copies of court decisions; from January 1, 2020 to August 20, 2020 - up to 2243 electronic copies of court decisions, ” - the BCU decision states.
UNBA also learned that the Unified State Register of Judgments contains court decisions that are allegedly classified by prosecutors. However, such court decisions were made in open court proceedings and they are not subject for protection from disclosure.
In addition, the prosecution often initiates the closure of access to court decisions unreasonably, but the Administrator of Registr satisfies the requests of prosecutors and investigators without examining the legal grounds for such a restriction.
The Bar Council of Ukraine draws attention to the fact that such actions contradict the requirements of the Law of Ukraine "On Access to Court Decisions", in particular, total restriction of review of copies of court decisions illegally restricts the individual rights to access court decisions.
"According to the requirements of Part 1 of Article 27 of the Criminal procedural code of Ukraine, participants in court proceedings, as well as persons who did not participate in criminal proceedings, if the court has decided on their rights, freedoms, interests or responsibilities, may not be restricted in access to court, both oral and written information on the results of the trial and the right to review procedural decisions and obtain copies. No one may be restricted in the right to receive information in court about the date, time and place of the trial and the court decisions adopted therein, except in cases established by law,” - BCU emphasizes.
The Bar Council of Ukraine draws attention to the fact that the procedure for access to a court decision is regulated by the Law of Ukraine “On Access to Court Decisions”.
This Law regulates relations on ensuring access to court decisions (decisions, court orders, rulings, judgments) adopted by courts of general jurisdiction, and maintaining the Unified State Register of Court Decisions (Article 1). Thus, it also applies to decisions that are made according to the rules and procedures of the Criminal procedural code of Ukraine.
Pursuant to Part 2 of Article 2 of this Law, all court decisions are open and subject to publication in electronic form no later than the next day after their preparation and signing, except for decisions on seizure of property and temporary access to assets and documents in criminal proceedings, which should be published on the day of their execution.
Pursuant to Part 3 of Article 3 of the Law, the court of general jurisdiction shall publish in the Register all court decisions and individual opinions of judges set forth in writing no later than the next day after their adoption or preparation of the full text.
The first part of Article 4 of the Law stipulates that court decisions published in the Register are open for free access 24 hours per day without holidays through the official web portal of the judiciary of Ukraine.
Pursuant to Part 4 of Article 4 of the Law, the restriction of the right to use the official web portal of the judiciary of Ukraine for free is permitted to the extent necessary to protect information that is subject to protection against disclosure by a court decision.
General access to decisions on permission to carry out the search of a person's home or other property, on refusal to satisfy a request to carry out the search of a person's home or other property of a person, on permission to conduct a covert investigative (search) action, on refusal to grant a request to conduct a covert investigative (search) action is ensured one year after the publication of such decisions in the Register.
If the court decision contains a state secret reflecting the information included in the Code of Information Constituting a State Secret, such decision may be classified as required by the Law of Ukraine "On State Secrets". In this case, access to a decision that contains a state secret is also restricted.
In all other cases, the decisions of the judges are binding on the Register.
The full text of the decision can be viewed on the UNBA website.
Popular news
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting
On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.
Self-government
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference
The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.
Self-government
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published
In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.
Professional Conduct
The results of the CISA cannot be used in disciplinary proceedings against advocates – BCU
Materials obtained through covert investigative (search) activities involving interference in private communications cannot be transferred or used in disciplinary proceedings against advocates. This is because the Code of Criminal Procedure does not allow investigators or prosecutors to use such materials outside of criminal proceedings.
URAU
Access to advocate contacts in URAU has been restored
The Bar Council of Ukraine has opened up public access to data from the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, which was closed at the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. The decision was made at a meeting on December 12–13.
Publications
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…