UNBA appeals to SJA and Prosecutor General regarding inadmissibility of restrictions on access to court decisions

Advocacy
14:15 Tue 10.11.20 528 Reviews
Print

The Ukrainian National Bar Association appealed to the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine and the Office of the Prosecutor General regarding the inadmissibility of unjustified restriction of access to court decisions based on requests of prosecutors.

This is stated in the decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine (hereinafter - BCU) dated October 15, 2020.

The issue concerns the secrecy by prosecutors of prosecutors` offices of court decisions in 2019 - 2020 and their execution. There are 36,827 copies of court decisions, to which access is limited. Information about this was received in response to a request addressed to Kholodniuk Z.V, the head of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine.

According to the response, the administrator of the Unified State Register of Judgments - the State Enterprise "Information Judicial Systems", -  limited viewing in the Register in full and public access the court decisions on the basis of requests filed by prosecutors, namely: from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 - up to 4308 electronic copies of court decisions; from January 1, 2020 to August 20, 2020  - up to 2243 electronic copies of court decisions, ” - the BCU decision states.

UNBA also learned that the Unified State Register of Judgments contains court decisions that are allegedly classified by prosecutors. However, such court decisions were made in open court proceedings and they  are not subject for protection from disclosure.

In addition, the prosecution often initiates the closure of access to court decisions unreasonably, but the Administrator of Registr satisfies the requests of prosecutors and investigators without examining the legal grounds for such a restriction.

The Bar Council of Ukraine draws attention to the fact that such actions contradict the requirements of the Law of Ukraine "On Access to Court Decisions", in particular, total restriction of review of copies of court decisions illegally restricts the individual rights to access court decisions.

"According to the requirements of Part 1 of Article 27 of the Criminal procedural code of Ukraine, participants in court proceedings, as well as persons who did not participate in criminal proceedings, if the court has decided on their rights, freedoms, interests or responsibilities, may not be restricted in access to court, both oral and written information on the results of the trial and the right to review procedural decisions and obtain copies. No one may be restricted in the right to receive information in court about the date, time and place of the trial and the court decisions adopted therein, except in cases established by law,” - BCU emphasizes.

The Bar Council of Ukraine draws attention to the fact that the procedure for access to a court decision is regulated by the Law of Ukraine “On Access to Court Decisions”.

This Law regulates relations on ensuring access to court decisions (decisions, court orders, rulings, judgments) adopted by courts of general jurisdiction, and maintaining the Unified State Register of Court Decisions (Article 1). Thus, it also applies to decisions that are made according to the rules and procedures of the Criminal procedural code of Ukraine.

Pursuant to Part 2 of Article 2 of this Law, all court decisions are open and subject to publication in electronic form no later than the next day after their preparation and signing, except for decisions on seizure of property and temporary access to assets and documents in criminal proceedings, which should be published on the day of their execution.

Pursuant to Part 3 of Article 3 of the Law, the court of general jurisdiction shall publish in the Register all court decisions and individual opinions of judges set forth in writing no later than the next day after their adoption or preparation of the full text.

The first part of Article 4 of the Law stipulates that court decisions published in the Register are open for free access 24 hours per day without holidays through the official web portal of the judiciary of Ukraine.

Pursuant to Part 4 of Article 4 of the Law, the restriction of the right to use the official web portal of the judiciary of Ukraine for free is permitted to the extent necessary to protect information that is subject to protection against disclosure by a court decision.

General access to decisions on permission to carry out the search of a person's home or other property, on refusal to satisfy a request to carry out the search of a person's home or other property of a person, on permission to conduct a covert investigative (search) action, on refusal to grant a request to conduct a covert investigative (search) action is ensured one year after the publication of such decisions in the Register.

If the court decision contains a state secret reflecting the information included in the Code of Information Constituting a State Secret, such decision may be classified as required by the Law of Ukraine "On State Secrets". In this case, access to a decision that contains a state secret is also restricted.

In all other cases, the decisions of the judges are binding on the Register.

The full text of the decision can be viewed on the UNBA website.

Popular news

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Greetings

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.

19:43 Thu 16.07.26 110
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

Legislation

The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.

14:26 Thu 09.07.26 110
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.

12:28 Fri 03.07.26 163
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

Discussion

The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.

10:27 Wed 01.07.26 107
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

Legislation

The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.

15:54 Tue 30.06.26 182
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

Interaction

A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.

16:59 Fri 26.06.26 252
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

Court practice

Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.

12:03 Mon 22.06.26 120
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

Court practice

Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.

18:22 Fri 19.06.26 239

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл