UNBA appeals to SJA and Prosecutor General regarding inadmissibility of restrictions on access to court decisions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association appealed to the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine and the Office of the Prosecutor General regarding the inadmissibility of unjustified restriction of access to court decisions based on requests of prosecutors.
This is stated in the decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine (hereinafter - BCU) dated October 15, 2020.
The issue concerns the secrecy by prosecutors of prosecutors` offices of court decisions in 2019 - 2020 and their execution. There are 36,827 copies of court decisions, to which access is limited. Information about this was received in response to a request addressed to Kholodniuk Z.V, the head of the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine.
According to the response, the administrator of the Unified State Register of Judgments - the State Enterprise "Information Judicial Systems", - limited viewing in the Register in full and public access the court decisions on the basis of requests filed by prosecutors, namely: from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 - up to 4308 electronic copies of court decisions; from January 1, 2020 to August 20, 2020 - up to 2243 electronic copies of court decisions, ” - the BCU decision states.
UNBA also learned that the Unified State Register of Judgments contains court decisions that are allegedly classified by prosecutors. However, such court decisions were made in open court proceedings and they are not subject for protection from disclosure.
In addition, the prosecution often initiates the closure of access to court decisions unreasonably, but the Administrator of Registr satisfies the requests of prosecutors and investigators without examining the legal grounds for such a restriction.
The Bar Council of Ukraine draws attention to the fact that such actions contradict the requirements of the Law of Ukraine "On Access to Court Decisions", in particular, total restriction of review of copies of court decisions illegally restricts the individual rights to access court decisions.
"According to the requirements of Part 1 of Article 27 of the Criminal procedural code of Ukraine, participants in court proceedings, as well as persons who did not participate in criminal proceedings, if the court has decided on their rights, freedoms, interests or responsibilities, may not be restricted in access to court, both oral and written information on the results of the trial and the right to review procedural decisions and obtain copies. No one may be restricted in the right to receive information in court about the date, time and place of the trial and the court decisions adopted therein, except in cases established by law,” - BCU emphasizes.
The Bar Council of Ukraine draws attention to the fact that the procedure for access to a court decision is regulated by the Law of Ukraine “On Access to Court Decisions”.
This Law regulates relations on ensuring access to court decisions (decisions, court orders, rulings, judgments) adopted by courts of general jurisdiction, and maintaining the Unified State Register of Court Decisions (Article 1). Thus, it also applies to decisions that are made according to the rules and procedures of the Criminal procedural code of Ukraine.
Pursuant to Part 2 of Article 2 of this Law, all court decisions are open and subject to publication in electronic form no later than the next day after their preparation and signing, except for decisions on seizure of property and temporary access to assets and documents in criminal proceedings, which should be published on the day of their execution.
Pursuant to Part 3 of Article 3 of the Law, the court of general jurisdiction shall publish in the Register all court decisions and individual opinions of judges set forth in writing no later than the next day after their adoption or preparation of the full text.
The first part of Article 4 of the Law stipulates that court decisions published in the Register are open for free access 24 hours per day without holidays through the official web portal of the judiciary of Ukraine.
Pursuant to Part 4 of Article 4 of the Law, the restriction of the right to use the official web portal of the judiciary of Ukraine for free is permitted to the extent necessary to protect information that is subject to protection against disclosure by a court decision.
General access to decisions on permission to carry out the search of a person's home or other property, on refusal to satisfy a request to carry out the search of a person's home or other property of a person, on permission to conduct a covert investigative (search) action, on refusal to grant a request to conduct a covert investigative (search) action is ensured one year after the publication of such decisions in the Register.
If the court decision contains a state secret reflecting the information included in the Code of Information Constituting a State Secret, such decision may be classified as required by the Law of Ukraine "On State Secrets". In this case, access to a decision that contains a state secret is also restricted.
In all other cases, the decisions of the judges are binding on the Register.
The full text of the decision can be viewed on the UNBA website.
Popular news
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Legislation
UNBA warned about the risks of uncoordinated changes regarding incapacitated persons
The Ukrainian National Bar Association supports the idea of strengthening guarantees for persons declared legally incompetent by a court, but warns against adopting changes that are not coordinated with each other. To ensure real, rather than declarative, protection of rights, a systematic review of the provisions of the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure is necessary.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences