Due to the lack of power, the Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City failed to form the Bar self-government of the capital - decision of the BCU

Advocacy
17:00 Fri 28.01.22 880 Reviews
Print

The Bar Council of Ukraine found that the Reporting and Election Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City on November 7, 2021, as lacking power. Therefore, the decisions it adopted entail no legal consequences.

The relevant decision of the BCU was adopted based on the results of the conclusions of the Working Group at a meeting on January 28, 2022.

As a result, in Kyiv there are no duly elected Chairs of the Bar Council and the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission, the Audit Commission, as well as Bar Council, QDCB, RACB have no members standing, as none were properly elected; there are no representatives of the Kyiv legal community in the BCU and HQDCB.

BCU acknowledged that advocates Petro Riabenko, Kateryna Nikitiuk, Ihor Cherezov, Valeriy Kostryuk, Yuriy Gryhorenko, advocates Oleg   Bereziuk, Oleksandr Voznyuk, Valeriy Jiautov, Oleksandr Dulsky, Serhiy Kravchuk, Tetiana Myronenko, Rostyslav Pukalo, Vladyslav Sitiuk, Yevhen Yakyma, Zoya Yarosh, Vadym Krasnyk, Serhiy Shutyii, Volodymyr Klochkov, Andriy Podosinov, Mykola Holodnyak, Ihor Korzhuk, Eduard Uhrynchuk, Nadezhda Korinna, Rovshanbek Rozmetov, Elena Naumova, Sergey Trofimov, Alexander Chernykh, Olga Begunova and Sergey Laputko; Volodymyr Voloschuk, Serhiy Komlev, Olena Karnaukh-Holodnyak, Oleksandr Nagornyi, Diana Nazarenko, Natalia Neupokoeva, Yevhen Solodko, Artur Shabliyenko, Oleksandr Boichenko, Natalia Voznyuk, Oleksandr Volvak, Tetiana Hnatiuk, Oleksiy Dryuk, Oksana Ordin, Andrey Parkheta, Vadim Rykov, Leonid Tannura and Alexander Usovich did not acquire the appropriate powers as Chairs and Members of Bar self-government.

The BCU took note of the conclusion of the Working Group, which established that the mandate commission of the Conference of Advocates did not receive neither from the President of the Conference, nor from the President of the Bar Council of Kyiv City the minutes of district meetings of advocates in Kyiv and registration lists that normally enables the replacement of temporary certificates with the mandates of delegates of the Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City. Also, the conference failed to approve the agenda and committed violations in terms of the voting procedure and vote counting.

Popular news

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Interaction

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.

9:59 Fri 27.03.26 100
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

Rule of Law Roadmap

Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.

16:42 Mon 23.03.26 132
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Rule of Law Roadmap

Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.

15:26 Fri 20.03.26 145
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

Discussion

ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».

13:58 Thu 19.03.26 108
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

Rule of Law Roadmap

Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.

18:14 Wed 18.03.26 104
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

Rule of Law Roadmap

Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.

18:03 Mon 16.03.26 126
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer

Guarantees of the practice of law

Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer

Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.

13:58 Mon 09.03.26 351
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks

Discussion

Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks

The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.

17:36 Thu 05.03.26 113

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл