Due to the lack of power, the Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City failed to form the Bar self-government of the capital - decision of the BCU

Advocacy
17:00 Fri 28.01.22 836 Reviews
Print

The Bar Council of Ukraine found that the Reporting and Election Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City on November 7, 2021, as lacking power. Therefore, the decisions it adopted entail no legal consequences.

The relevant decision of the BCU was adopted based on the results of the conclusions of the Working Group at a meeting on January 28, 2022.

As a result, in Kyiv there are no duly elected Chairs of the Bar Council and the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission, the Audit Commission, as well as Bar Council, QDCB, RACB have no members standing, as none were properly elected; there are no representatives of the Kyiv legal community in the BCU and HQDCB.

BCU acknowledged that advocates Petro Riabenko, Kateryna Nikitiuk, Ihor Cherezov, Valeriy Kostryuk, Yuriy Gryhorenko, advocates Oleg   Bereziuk, Oleksandr Voznyuk, Valeriy Jiautov, Oleksandr Dulsky, Serhiy Kravchuk, Tetiana Myronenko, Rostyslav Pukalo, Vladyslav Sitiuk, Yevhen Yakyma, Zoya Yarosh, Vadym Krasnyk, Serhiy Shutyii, Volodymyr Klochkov, Andriy Podosinov, Mykola Holodnyak, Ihor Korzhuk, Eduard Uhrynchuk, Nadezhda Korinna, Rovshanbek Rozmetov, Elena Naumova, Sergey Trofimov, Alexander Chernykh, Olga Begunova and Sergey Laputko; Volodymyr Voloschuk, Serhiy Komlev, Olena Karnaukh-Holodnyak, Oleksandr Nagornyi, Diana Nazarenko, Natalia Neupokoeva, Yevhen Solodko, Artur Shabliyenko, Oleksandr Boichenko, Natalia Voznyuk, Oleksandr Volvak, Tetiana Hnatiuk, Oleksiy Dryuk, Oksana Ordin, Andrey Parkheta, Vadim Rykov, Leonid Tannura and Alexander Usovich did not acquire the appropriate powers as Chairs and Members of Bar self-government.

The BCU took note of the conclusion of the Working Group, which established that the mandate commission of the Conference of Advocates did not receive neither from the President of the Conference, nor from the President of the Bar Council of Kyiv City the minutes of district meetings of advocates in Kyiv and registration lists that normally enables the replacement of temporary certificates with the mandates of delegates of the Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City. Also, the conference failed to approve the agenda and committed violations in terms of the voting procedure and vote counting.

Popular news

Inheritance of a share in joint property and more: advocates have made comments

Legislation

Inheritance of a share in joint property and more: advocates have made comments

In the event of the death of one of the subjects of joint shared ownership, the shares of each of the co-owners in the joint shared ownership shall be deemed equal, unless otherwise agreed between them, by law, or by a court decision.

12:58 Fri 16.01.26 119
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts

Legislation

UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts

International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.

14:34 Wed 07.01.26 213
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?

Legislation

How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?

The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».

15:35 Tue 06.01.26 194
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy

Legislation

Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy

The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.

19:31 Fri 02.01.26 172
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny

Legislation

Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny

Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.

19:13 Fri 02.01.26 161
Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy

Legislation

Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy

The general approach to working on the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law in terms of reforming advocacy should not be based on «slogans», but rather on gathering facts, comparing them with standards, consulting with the professional community, and formulating norms for which participants are prepared to take responsibility.

18:41 Fri 02.01.26 145
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting

Legislation

Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting

On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.

18:24 Fri 02.01.26 160
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference

Self-government

BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference

The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.

14:21 Wed 31.12.25 248

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл