Due to the lack of power, the Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City failed to form the Bar self-government of the capital - decision of the BCU
The Bar Council of Ukraine found that the Reporting and Election Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City on November 7, 2021, as lacking power. Therefore, the decisions it adopted entail no legal consequences.
The relevant decision of the BCU was adopted based on the results of the conclusions of the Working Group at a meeting on January 28, 2022.
As a result, in Kyiv there are no duly elected Chairs of the Bar Council and the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission, the Audit Commission, as well as Bar Council, QDCB, RACB have no members standing, as none were properly elected; there are no representatives of the Kyiv legal community in the BCU and HQDCB.
BCU acknowledged that advocates Petro Riabenko, Kateryna Nikitiuk, Ihor Cherezov, Valeriy Kostryuk, Yuriy Gryhorenko, advocates Oleg Bereziuk, Oleksandr Voznyuk, Valeriy Jiautov, Oleksandr Dulsky, Serhiy Kravchuk, Tetiana Myronenko, Rostyslav Pukalo, Vladyslav Sitiuk, Yevhen Yakyma, Zoya Yarosh, Vadym Krasnyk, Serhiy Shutyii, Volodymyr Klochkov, Andriy Podosinov, Mykola Holodnyak, Ihor Korzhuk, Eduard Uhrynchuk, Nadezhda Korinna, Rovshanbek Rozmetov, Elena Naumova, Sergey Trofimov, Alexander Chernykh, Olga Begunova and Sergey Laputko; Volodymyr Voloschuk, Serhiy Komlev, Olena Karnaukh-Holodnyak, Oleksandr Nagornyi, Diana Nazarenko, Natalia Neupokoeva, Yevhen Solodko, Artur Shabliyenko, Oleksandr Boichenko, Natalia Voznyuk, Oleksandr Volvak, Tetiana Hnatiuk, Oleksiy Dryuk, Oksana Ordin, Andrey Parkheta, Vadim Rykov, Leonid Tannura and Alexander Usovich did not acquire the appropriate powers as Chairs and Members of Bar self-government.
The BCU took note of the conclusion of the Working Group, which established that the mandate commission of the Conference of Advocates did not receive neither from the President of the Conference, nor from the President of the Bar Council of Kyiv City the minutes of district meetings of advocates in Kyiv and registration lists that normally enables the replacement of temporary certificates with the mandates of delegates of the Conference of Advocates of Kyiv City. Also, the conference failed to approve the agenda and committed violations in terms of the voting procedure and vote counting.Popular news
Advocacy
FLA needs urgent help, - Valentyn Gvozdiy
Twelve years of existence of the free legal aid system in Ukraine is enough to understand the inability of the Ministry of Justice to effectively manage this area.
Advocacy
The Ombudsman is concerned about the state of the FLA system
The Secretariat of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights is ready to join the development of proposals for amendments to the legal acts developed by the Ukrainian National Bar Association that will improve the functioning of the free legal aid system.
Advocacy
Ombudsman to provide legal aid with support of UNBA - pilot project
The Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights has launched a pilot project to provide professional legal aid to citizens in five regions of Ukraine.
Advocacy
Another model should be introduced for the FLA system, - Lidiya Izovitova
Monitoring of the current state of functioning of the legal aid system shows the existence of significant and conceptual problems in the implementation of this assistance in Ukraine.
Advocacy
Violation of media guarantees of advocacy is being studied by the UNBA
An open appeal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Information Policy and Interaction with the Mass Media to the advocates.
Advocacy
Lawyers are offered to be booked - amendments to draft law No. 10449
In their amendments to the draft law on strengthening mobilization, MPs propose to provide for the booking of lawyers. The goal is to prevent disruptions of court hearings.
Advocacy
E-Court failures violate constitutional guarantees – UNBA
In recent days, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has received numerous reports from lawyers about technical failures in the operation of the Electronic Court subsystem. In particular, the complaints relate to the inability to log in to the electronic office, which restricts advocates in exercising their procedural rights, in particular, to submit documents and participate in court hearings in the videoconference mode.
Advocacy
Fixed fee: time of work is important for reimbursement of attorney's fees – SC
The procedure for calculating the hourly fee differs from the fixed fee, which does not take into account the actual time spent. However, in both cases, they are taken into account when deciding on the reimbursement of legal aid expenses.
Publications
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…