HQDCB members will not be able to abstain from voting

Advocacy
17:54 Wed 23.10.24 159 Reviews
Print

In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar, the HQDCB's decision is made by open vote. Until the last meeting, members of the commission could vote for, against, and abstain.

The last option, when a member of the commission could withdraw from the decision, was removed by the Bar Council of Ukraine. By its decision of 21.10.2024 No. 67, it amended the Rules of Procedure of the HQDCB. Now, a member of the HQDCB is not entitled to abstain from voting.

As a reminder, the HQDCB is a collegial body tasked with reviewing complaints against decisions, actions or inactions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar associations. The HQDCB consists of thirty members.

Upon consideration of the complaint, the Commission has the right to:

1) leave the complaint unsatisfied and the QDCB's decision unchanged;

2) change the decision of the QDCB;

3) to cancel the decision of the QDCB and make a new decision;

4) send the case for a new consideration and oblige the QDCB to take certain actions.

Decisions are made by voting by a majority of the total number of commission members. In other words, in any case, at least 16 votes are required to make a decision.

Pursuant to clause 3.45 of the HQDCB Regulations, in the absence of the majority of votes required by law, the complaint is considered rejected, as indicated in the HQDCB decision to dismiss the complaint and leave the decision of the QDCB unchanged.

Thus, in accordance with this clause, in some cases, commission members who did not support the contested decision of the QDCB but at the same time did not accept the rapporteur's proposals on it, such members had the opportunity to abstain from voting on the draft decision of the Higher Commission. Starting from the next meeting, they will have to decide in favor of or against the draft decision in any case.

In addition, Decision No. 67 also clarified the provisions on cases when complaints are sent for consideration to the QDCB of another region, the secretariat's access to the materials of disciplinary proceedings, the forms of decisions taken by the commission, the format of notifications of meetings, and other procedural issues.

Popular news

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Interaction

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.

9:59 Fri 27.03.26 130
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

Rule of Law Roadmap

Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.

16:42 Mon 23.03.26 157
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Rule of Law Roadmap

Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.

15:26 Fri 20.03.26 165
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

Discussion

ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».

13:58 Thu 19.03.26 130
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

Rule of Law Roadmap

Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.

18:14 Wed 18.03.26 122
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

Rule of Law Roadmap

Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.

18:03 Mon 16.03.26 141
Where does legal information end and legal assistance begin?

Abroad

Where does legal information end and legal assistance begin?

Law firms find themselves in a dilemma: they want to make the most of artificial intelligence, but at the same time, more and more people are entrusting their legal matters to large language models. And this, as experts point out, entails countless risks.

15:56 Fri 13.03.26 101
During a search of an advocate's office in Kyiv a telephone was seized and personal records were examined

Guarantees of the practice of law

During a search of an advocate's office in Kyiv a telephone was seized and personal records were examined

Detectives from the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine conducted a search of the office of a Kyiv law firm as part of criminal proceedings under Part 1 of Article 366-2 (False Declaration) and Article 368-5 (Illegal Enrichment) of the Criminal Code.

15:02 Thu 12.03.26 100

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл