HQDCB members will not be able to abstain from voting
In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar, the HQDCB's decision is made by open vote. Until the last meeting, members of the commission could vote for, against, and abstain.
The last option, when a member of the commission could withdraw from the decision, was removed by the Bar Council of Ukraine. By its decision of 21.10.2024 No. 67, it amended the Rules of Procedure of the HQDCB. Now, a member of the HQDCB is not entitled to abstain from voting.
As a reminder, the HQDCB is a collegial body tasked with reviewing complaints against decisions, actions or inactions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar associations. The HQDCB consists of thirty members.
Upon consideration of the complaint, the Commission has the right to:
1) leave the complaint unsatisfied and the QDCB's decision unchanged;
2) change the decision of the QDCB;
3) to cancel the decision of the QDCB and make a new decision;
4) send the case for a new consideration and oblige the QDCB to take certain actions.
Decisions are made by voting by a majority of the total number of commission members. In other words, in any case, at least 16 votes are required to make a decision.
Pursuant to clause 3.45 of the HQDCB Regulations, in the absence of the majority of votes required by law, the complaint is considered rejected, as indicated in the HQDCB decision to dismiss the complaint and leave the decision of the QDCB unchanged.
Thus, in accordance with this clause, in some cases, commission members who did not support the contested decision of the QDCB but at the same time did not accept the rapporteur's proposals on it, such members had the opportunity to abstain from voting on the draft decision of the Higher Commission. Starting from the next meeting, they will have to decide in favor of or against the draft decision in any case.
In addition, Decision No. 67 also clarified the provisions on cases when complaints are sent for consideration to the QDCB of another region, the secretariat's access to the materials of disciplinary proceedings, the forms of decisions taken by the commission, the format of notifications of meetings, and other procedural issues.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences