HQDCB members will not be able to abstain from voting

Advocacy
17:54 Wed 23.10.24 200 Reviews
Print

In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar, the HQDCB's decision is made by open vote. Until the last meeting, members of the commission could vote for, against, and abstain.

The last option, when a member of the commission could withdraw from the decision, was removed by the Bar Council of Ukraine. By its decision of 21.10.2024 No. 67, it amended the Rules of Procedure of the HQDCB. Now, a member of the HQDCB is not entitled to abstain from voting.

As a reminder, the HQDCB is a collegial body tasked with reviewing complaints against decisions, actions or inactions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar associations. The HQDCB consists of thirty members.

Upon consideration of the complaint, the Commission has the right to:

1) leave the complaint unsatisfied and the QDCB's decision unchanged;

2) change the decision of the QDCB;

3) to cancel the decision of the QDCB and make a new decision;

4) send the case for a new consideration and oblige the QDCB to take certain actions.

Decisions are made by voting by a majority of the total number of commission members. In other words, in any case, at least 16 votes are required to make a decision.

Pursuant to clause 3.45 of the HQDCB Regulations, in the absence of the majority of votes required by law, the complaint is considered rejected, as indicated in the HQDCB decision to dismiss the complaint and leave the decision of the QDCB unchanged.

Thus, in accordance with this clause, in some cases, commission members who did not support the contested decision of the QDCB but at the same time did not accept the rapporteur's proposals on it, such members had the opportunity to abstain from voting on the draft decision of the Higher Commission. Starting from the next meeting, they will have to decide in favor of or against the draft decision in any case.

In addition, Decision No. 67 also clarified the provisions on cases when complaints are sent for consideration to the QDCB of another region, the secretariat's access to the materials of disciplinary proceedings, the forms of decisions taken by the commission, the format of notifications of meetings, and other procedural issues.

Popular news

Internships at German law firms: IRZ is accepting applications from Ukrainians

Announcements

Internships at German law firms: IRZ is accepting applications from Ukrainians

In 2026, the German Foundation for International Legal Cooperation (IRZ) plans to organize a multilateral internship program for young advocates from partner countries. Participants will attend an introductory seminar in Bonn and complete internships at law firms in Germany.

10:51 Thu 11.06.26 110
Restrictions on the right to legal assistance in pretrial detention centers are unacceptable – statement by the BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

Restrictions on the right to legal assistance in pretrial detention centers are unacceptable – statement by the BCU

The Bar Council of Ukraine has stated that it is unacceptable to restrict the right to professional legal assistance, the guarantees of legal practice, and the confidentiality of communications between advocates and clients in pretrial detention facilities operated by the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine.

19:17 Tue 09.06.26 102
The UNBA presented the CCBE with an overview of legal reform and challenges

European integration

The UNBA presented the CCBE with an overview of legal reform and challenges

Reform of the legal profession, Ukraine’s European integration commitments, guarantees of the profession’s independence, and practices of bar self-governance in European countries — these issues were the subject of discussion at the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).

14:39 Mon 01.06.26 178
The UNBA is compiling the findings of the subgroups regarding the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap

Rule of Law Roadmap

The UNBA is compiling the findings of the subgroups regarding the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap

Today, May 28, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the Coordination Bureau of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding the reform of the advocacy profession. Following a series of meetings by thematic subgroups, the work is now moving to the stage of consolidating proposals and preparing a coordinated package of recommendations.

18:53 Thu 28.05.26 145
UNBA discussed removing barriers at border crossings for families with children with disabilities

Discussion

UNBA discussed removing barriers at border crossings for families with children with disabilities

Families of children with disabilities face additional requirements when traveling abroad, particularly regarding consular registration. What is happening and what changes are needed to remove these obstacles were discussed during the roundtable «Borders without barriers for families of children with disabilities».

17:13 Thu 28.05.26 137
New rules, old problems: the UNBA discussed the work of the ETAIDF and MMC

Discussion

New rules, old problems: the UNBA discussed the work of the ETAIDF and MMC

The reform of medical-social assessment and military medical commissions has changed procedures but has not resolved practical issues. People face situations where documents are not issued, decisions are based on technicalities, assessments are delayed, and they struggle to demonstrate their actual health status in specific life situations.

16:18 Wed 27.05.26 152
Co-parenting shouldn't be reduced to a 50/50 formula, — roundtable discussion

Discussion

Co-parenting shouldn't be reduced to a 50/50 formula, — roundtable discussion

Following a divorce, joint custody can serve as a mechanism for ensuring equal parental rights. However, this model requires clear criteria and cannot be applied automatically without taking into account the child’s age, the level of conflict between the parents, the risk of violence, and the feasibility of enforcing the future decision.

17:02 Wed 20.05.26 170
Penalties for errors in military registration require clear rules, – UNBA

Legislation

Penalties for errors in military registration require clear rules, – UNBA

The liability of officials for violations of military registration rules must be legally defined, proportionate, and effectively enforceable. Otherwise, the new fines will not protect citizens from registration errors but will create additional risks.

18:14 Mon 18.05.26 200

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл