HQDCB members will not be able to abstain from voting

Advocacy
17:54 Wed 23.10.24 250 Reviews
Print

In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar, the HQDCB's decision is made by open vote. Until the last meeting, members of the commission could vote for, against, and abstain.

The last option, when a member of the commission could withdraw from the decision, was removed by the Bar Council of Ukraine. By its decision of 21.10.2024 No. 67, it amended the Rules of Procedure of the HQDCB. Now, a member of the HQDCB is not entitled to abstain from voting.

As a reminder, the HQDCB is a collegial body tasked with reviewing complaints against decisions, actions or inactions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar associations. The HQDCB consists of thirty members.

Upon consideration of the complaint, the Commission has the right to:

1) leave the complaint unsatisfied and the QDCB's decision unchanged;

2) change the decision of the QDCB;

3) to cancel the decision of the QDCB and make a new decision;

4) send the case for a new consideration and oblige the QDCB to take certain actions.

Decisions are made by voting by a majority of the total number of commission members. In other words, in any case, at least 16 votes are required to make a decision.

Pursuant to clause 3.45 of the HQDCB Regulations, in the absence of the majority of votes required by law, the complaint is considered rejected, as indicated in the HQDCB decision to dismiss the complaint and leave the decision of the QDCB unchanged.

Thus, in accordance with this clause, in some cases, commission members who did not support the contested decision of the QDCB but at the same time did not accept the rapporteur's proposals on it, such members had the opportunity to abstain from voting on the draft decision of the Higher Commission. Starting from the next meeting, they will have to decide in favor of or against the draft decision in any case.

In addition, Decision No. 67 also clarified the provisions on cases when complaints are sent for consideration to the QDCB of another region, the secretariat's access to the materials of disciplinary proceedings, the forms of decisions taken by the commission, the format of notifications of meetings, and other procedural issues.

Popular news

A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced

Legislation

A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced

The constitutional guarantees of legal aid, defense, and the independence of advocacy cannot be realized without protecting advocates from unwarranted interference in their professional activities, including searches, the seizure of professional materials and the use of criminal procedural mechanisms to exert pressure.

14:08 Mon 05.10.26 142
The CCBE is discussing European justice and issues related to the protection of advocates

Abroad

The CCBE is discussing European justice and issues related to the protection of advocates

Today, October 2, a meeting of the Standing Committee of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) is taking place in Brussels. On the agenda are the protection of the advocate profession, the rule of law, attorney-client privilege, and changes in the European justice system.

14:04 Fri 02.10.26 107
The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels

Rule of Law Roadmap

The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels

The Ukrainian National Bar Association presented its proposals for the upcoming law on advocacy, aligned with the Rule of Law Roadmap. The presentation covered topics such as access to the profession, self-governance, disciplinary procedures, professional development and guarantees for the practice of advocacy.

20:36 Thu 01.10.26 159
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova

Guarantees of the practice of law

Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova

Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.

15:47 Fri 25.09.26 220
Efforts to develop advocacy must be brought to fruition — A. Misyats

Self-government

Efforts to develop advocacy must be brought to fruition — A. Misyats

The Ukrainian advocacy profession is currently going through a critical phase. Amid the war, it must ensure the continuity of legal aid, defend the independence of the profession, and improve qualification and disciplinary procedures in accordance with European standards. The work that has been started must be brought to a practical conclusion.

20:32 Fri 18.09.26 151
Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA

Support

Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA

On September 18, a working meeting was held at the office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with Executive Director of the International Bar Association (IBA) Mark Ellis. The parties discussed the Ukrainian advocacy profession’s participation in European legal processes, the protection of the UNBA’s digital infrastructure, psychological support for advocates and future areas of cooperation.

19:46 Fri 18.09.26 211
Tax residency of Ukrainians abroad: what matters

Educational events

Tax residency of Ukrainians abroad: what matters

The determination of tax residency for Ukrainians who have been living abroad for an extended period depends on the combination of their personal and economic ties to each country. The established status determines the procedure for reporting income, paying taxes and fulfilling CFC reporting obligations.

18:19 Thu 17.09.26 193
Time, risk of dismissal and effort to provide rationale: how a court reads a procedural document

Educational events

Time, risk of dismissal and effort to provide rationale: how a court reads a procedural document

When drafting a procedural document, an advocate should take into account three criteria used by the court: the time required to review the materials, the risk of the decision being overturned, and the effort required to provide a rationale for it.

10:33 Thu 17.09.26 109

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл