HQDCB members will not be able to abstain from voting

Advocacy
17:54 Wed 23.10.24 170 Reviews
Print

In accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar, the HQDCB's decision is made by open vote. Until the last meeting, members of the commission could vote for, against, and abstain.

The last option, when a member of the commission could withdraw from the decision, was removed by the Bar Council of Ukraine. By its decision of 21.10.2024 No. 67, it amended the Rules of Procedure of the HQDCB. Now, a member of the HQDCB is not entitled to abstain from voting.

As a reminder, the HQDCB is a collegial body tasked with reviewing complaints against decisions, actions or inactions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar associations. The HQDCB consists of thirty members.

Upon consideration of the complaint, the Commission has the right to:

1) leave the complaint unsatisfied and the QDCB's decision unchanged;

2) change the decision of the QDCB;

3) to cancel the decision of the QDCB and make a new decision;

4) send the case for a new consideration and oblige the QDCB to take certain actions.

Decisions are made by voting by a majority of the total number of commission members. In other words, in any case, at least 16 votes are required to make a decision.

Pursuant to clause 3.45 of the HQDCB Regulations, in the absence of the majority of votes required by law, the complaint is considered rejected, as indicated in the HQDCB decision to dismiss the complaint and leave the decision of the QDCB unchanged.

Thus, in accordance with this clause, in some cases, commission members who did not support the contested decision of the QDCB but at the same time did not accept the rapporteur's proposals on it, such members had the opportunity to abstain from voting on the draft decision of the Higher Commission. Starting from the next meeting, they will have to decide in favor of or against the draft decision in any case.

In addition, Decision No. 67 also clarified the provisions on cases when complaints are sent for consideration to the QDCB of another region, the secretariat's access to the materials of disciplinary proceedings, the forms of decisions taken by the commission, the format of notifications of meetings, and other procedural issues.

Popular news

The model for legal assistance to veterans was discussed at the UNBA

Legal defence of military personnel

The model for legal assistance to veterans was discussed at the UNBA

A working meeting was held at the Ukrainian National Bar Association, during which representatives of the advocacy profession, the Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine and a foreign expert discussed approaches to providing legal aid to veterans, the role of the advocacy profession in this system, and the experience of other countries.

18:07 Mon 20.04.26 170
The CJU has endorsed guarantees of the legal profession’s independence and has proposed a meeting with the BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

The CJU has endorsed guarantees of the legal profession’s independence and has proposed a meeting with the BCU

The Council of Judges of Ukraine has responded to a letter from the Bar Council of Ukraine regarding the inadmissibility of the High Council of Justice granting immunity to a member of the High Council of Justice — a privilege not provided for by law — as well as regarding violations of constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession and attorney-client privilege.

18:24 Fri 17.04.26 149
The UNBA and the Ministry of Veterans are expanding their cooperation

Interaction

The UNBA and the Ministry of Veterans are expanding their cooperation

War veterans, their family members, as well as the family members of fallen Defenders of Ukraine are to receive improved access to professional legal assistance and additional opportunities for independent legal protection.

16:27 Mon 13.04.26 169
Advocates have warned that the draft Labor Code would curtail workers' protections

Legislation

Advocates have warned that the draft Labor Code would curtail workers' protections

Certain provisions of the draft Labor Code of Ukraine regarding collective labor disputes undermine labor protections and do not comply with constitutional and international standards.

11:47 Thu 09.04.26 252
Representatives from the Ministry of Veterans Affairs and the UNBA discussed veterans' access to justice

Legal defence of military personnel

Representatives from the Ministry of Veterans Affairs and the UNBA discussed veterans' access to justice

On April 3, a working meeting was held at the Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine with representatives of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, dedicated to improving the effectiveness of legal protection for war veterans and their families.

16:17 Tue 07.04.26 196
The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works

Educational events

The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works

The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.

11:28 Tue 07.04.26 239
The UNBA and the Coordination headquarters have agreed to cooperate in assisting those released from captivity

Interaction

The UNBA and the Coordination headquarters have agreed to cooperate in assisting those released from captivity

Servicemen released from captivity, family members of prisoners of war, civilians deprived of their personal liberty as a result of armed aggression, as well as persons missing in connection with the war, will gain additional opportunities to access legal assistance and protect their rights.

19:14 Mon 06.04.26 196
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession

Self-government

BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession

The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.

14:56 Thu 02.04.26 242

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл