The procedure for replacing private enforcement agents requires clear deadlines for the Ministry of Justice
The Ukrainian National Bar Association supports the improvements to the procedures for suspending and terminating the activities of private enforcement agents proposed in Draft Law No. 13499, but draws attention to a number of aspects that need to be clarified before the document is adopted.
The relevant comments and proposals have been submitted to the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy.
The activities of private enforcement agents are regulated by the Law «On bodies and persons carrying out enforcement of court decisions and decisions of other bodies». Since they ensure the enforcement of court decisions, it is important that, in the event of suspension or termination of their activities, there are no delays in the proceedings they are executing.
Currently, in the event of suspension of a private enforcement agent’s activity, they are obliged to resolve the issue of their replacement by another private enforcement agent (part 5 of Article 42 of the Law). The procedure takes place in agreement with the claimant on the basis of an agreement concluded with another private enforcement agent. In the absence of the claimant's consent, the private enforcement agent returns the enforcement document to the claimant or, in accordance with the claimant's decision, transfers it to the relevant state enforcement service or another private enforcement agent.
The draft proposes to clarify the replacement procedure. In the event of suspension of activities, the private enforcement agent shall be obliged, within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the order of the Ministry of Justice on the suspension of its activities, to resolve the issue of its replacement by another private enforcement agent and, within the same period, to provide the Ministry of Justice with a duly certified copy of the agreement on its replacement by another private enforcement agent. If this is not done, the private enforcement agent who will carry out the replacement will be determined by the Ministry of Justice on the basis of a proposal from the Council of Private Enforcement Agents of Ukraine. If the CPEU does not submit a relevant proposal within 10 working days, the new private enforcement agent will be determined by the Ministry of Justice independently.
After conducting a legal analysis of the draft, the UNBA Committee on enforcement of decisions drew particular attention to these changes and proposed to supplement Part 5 of Article 42 with deadlines for the Ministry of Justice to make decisions, as such deadlines are currently absent.
Popular news
Legislation
The path to ratification of the Convention must not end in yet another delay — L. Izovitova
Ukraine’s preparations for the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer have already passed key stages. Now, government institutions must submit the matter to the Verkhovna Rada for consideration. In doing so, Ukraine may complete the ratification process faster than EU member states.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine could be the first to implement a European mechanism for the protection of advocates. What’s holding it back?
Ukraine has a chance to be the first country to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. Political support for this exists, but the government’s legislative package has not yet been submitted to parliament. Meanwhile, the number of violations of advocates’ rights is on the rise.
Educational events
How can an advocate verify that work has been completed if the client refuses to sign the report?
When billing by the hour, the primary document for determining the fee may be a detailed report on the time spent by the advocate and the work performed. To prevent the client from withholding payment, the contract should specify in advance the procedure for submitting and approving such a report.
Self-government
The BCU took note of the public appeal from the HCJ
The Bar Council of Ukraine has determined that, given the current security situation, it is objectively impossible to hold, in accordance with the procedure established by the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law», meetings of advocates, regional conferences of advocates and the Congress of Ukrainian Advocates, including for the purpose of electing two members of the High Council of Justice under the quota allocated to the Congress of Ukrainian Advocates.
War
The BCU has launched a digital project «Wall of Remembrance and Honor»
The Bar Council of Ukraine has adopted a resolution to launch the digital project «Wall of Remembrance and Honor». To this end, the UNBA is beginning to collect information on advocates and paralegals who lost their lives as a result of the Russian Federation’s armed aggression against Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
«Advocate+» has expanded its operations to 18 military units
The «Advocate+» project of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, which assigns advocates to military units, has expanded its operations to 18 units. Specialists have already been assigned to the new participants and are set to begin consultations next week.
Appointment
The UNBA has established a Committee on cybersecurity and virtual assets
A permanent collegial advisory body — the Committee on cybersecurity and virtual assets has been established under the UNBA.
Legal defence of military personnel
Medical care, veterans' benefits and legal assistance: what changes are needed to protect service members
The consequences of torture and illnesses suffered by Ukrainian servicemembers while in captivity are not always properly documented or taken into account when providing social benefits. Therefore, a medical examination is crucial during the reintegration phase; it is also necessary for documenting war crimes.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates