The procedure for replacing private enforcement agents requires clear deadlines for the Ministry of Justice
The Ukrainian National Bar Association supports the improvements to the procedures for suspending and terminating the activities of private enforcement agents proposed in Draft Law No. 13499, but draws attention to a number of aspects that need to be clarified before the document is adopted.
The relevant comments and proposals have been submitted to the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy.
The activities of private enforcement agents are regulated by the Law «On bodies and persons carrying out enforcement of court decisions and decisions of other bodies». Since they ensure the enforcement of court decisions, it is important that, in the event of suspension or termination of their activities, there are no delays in the proceedings they are executing.
Currently, in the event of suspension of a private enforcement agent’s activity, they are obliged to resolve the issue of their replacement by another private enforcement agent (part 5 of Article 42 of the Law). The procedure takes place in agreement with the claimant on the basis of an agreement concluded with another private enforcement agent. In the absence of the claimant's consent, the private enforcement agent returns the enforcement document to the claimant or, in accordance with the claimant's decision, transfers it to the relevant state enforcement service or another private enforcement agent.
The draft proposes to clarify the replacement procedure. In the event of suspension of activities, the private enforcement agent shall be obliged, within 10 working days from the date of receipt of the order of the Ministry of Justice on the suspension of its activities, to resolve the issue of its replacement by another private enforcement agent and, within the same period, to provide the Ministry of Justice with a duly certified copy of the agreement on its replacement by another private enforcement agent. If this is not done, the private enforcement agent who will carry out the replacement will be determined by the Ministry of Justice on the basis of a proposal from the Council of Private Enforcement Agents of Ukraine. If the CPEU does not submit a relevant proposal within 10 working days, the new private enforcement agent will be determined by the Ministry of Justice independently.
After conducting a legal analysis of the draft, the UNBA Committee on enforcement of decisions drew particular attention to these changes and proposed to supplement Part 5 of Article 42 with deadlines for the Ministry of Justice to make decisions, as such deadlines are currently absent.
Popular news
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Legislation
UNBA warned about the risks of uncoordinated changes regarding incapacitated persons
The Ukrainian National Bar Association supports the idea of strengthening guarantees for persons declared legally incompetent by a court, but warns against adopting changes that are not coordinated with each other. To ensure real, rather than declarative, protection of rights, a systematic review of the provisions of the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure is necessary.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences