Advocate's dossier and lobbyist's dossier: how to distinguish between them?
The combination of advocacy and lobbying activities is possible only if there is a clear distinction between legal regimes. Attorney-client privilege cannot be restricted by the introduction of lobbying, as it is a fundamental guarantee of the independence of the advocacy profession and trust in the profession.
This was discussed on February 6 during a meeting of the Lobbying Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, chaired by Oleksiy Shevchuk.
The key topic was the distinction between an advocate's file and a lobbyist's file. The participants of the meeting emphasized that a clear separation of these legal regimes is of fundamental importance for maintaining the standards of attorney-client privilege, professional guarantees, and trust in the legal profession. It was emphasized that the introduction of the institution of lobbying cannot create risks for the confidentiality of lawyers' activities, nor should it replace or blur the special legal regime for the protection of lawyer-client privilege.
In this context, the idea of holding a working meeting in the near future with representatives of the National Agency for Corruption Prevention, which ensures state supervision of compliance with the requirements of the legislation on lobbying, was voiced. The aim is to conduct explanatory work and organize a specialized round table to develop a common approach to protecting attorney-client privilege for advocates who engage in lobbying activities.
Separately, they discussed practical issues of applying the new regulations, in particular the taxation of the activities of lobbyist advocates, the potential risks of conflicts of interest in the event of a combination of relevant statuses, as well as the technical possibility of obtaining extracts from the Transparency Register through the Diia application.
Participants were also informed about educational initiatives: in the near future, the UNBA Higher School of Advocacy plans to launch a specialized course entitled «Advocates in the field of lobbying: legal and ethical aspects». Its purpose is to provide practical training for advocates to work under the new legislative regulations, as well as to establish uniform professional standards for lobbying activities by advocates.
The Lobbying Committee of the UNBA invited colleagues to join the work and send draft proposals for changes to the legislation necessary for the effective and safe activities of advocate-lobbyists.
Popular news
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Appointment
A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo
Advocate Irena Maria Ostrozka-Sangushko has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Arab Republic of Egypt, in the city of Cairo. The corresponding Order No. 80, dated March 10, 2026, was signed by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates