BCU canceled the decision of the Bar Council of Kyiv region on strike of advocates
The Bar Council of Ukraine canceled the decision of the Bar Council of Kyiv region on June 12, 2019, which proclaimed a warning strike of advocates in the region.
The BCU ruled the decision in the electronic session on June 13. Full text of the decision of BCU
The reason for the cancellation of the decision of the Bar Council of the Kyiv region was the violation as a result of its implementation of the constitutional rights of citizens to legal assistance and guarantees of advocacy.
The BCU stressed that the decision of the bodies of bar self-government should not be aimed at limiting or blocking the activities of advocates on motives not provided for in the framework law and professional conduct rules, groundless accusation of the Bar of Ukraine in the refusal to exercise protection of the constitutional rights of citizens of Ukraine and other persons.
In accordance with Article 21 of the Law of Ukraine "On the Bar and Advocacy" While practicing law, the attorney shall be obliged to abide by the oath of attorney of Ukraine and the professional conduct rules; the attorney may not The attorney may not exercise his/her rights contrary to the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a client, except when otherwise established by law.
The obvious consequences of the decision taken by the Bar Council of Kyiv region on strike will be the violation of the constitutional right of citizens to professional legal assistance. At the same time, not only the clients of the advocates of the Kyiv oblast are at risk, but every resident of the region who may potentially need an advocate to defend his constitutional rights in a strike period.
The Bar Council of Ukraine stresses the inadmissibility of a situation where five thousand advocates in the region will be obliged to omit and refrain from providing legal assistance in the territory of the Kyiv region, and law enforcement and the courts will continue to perform their duties. Detention, searches, other procedural actions in the framework of criminal proceedings, court hearings, including ruling the court decisions, will take place in the absence of defenders involved in the strike", - referred to in the decision of the BCU.
The BCU also emphasized the strict observance by advocates of their professional obligations and the provision of continuous legal assistance to the client, as well as to keep advocates from exercising their rights in violation of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of the client, using the means and methods that are in conflict with the current legislation and professional conduct rules.
The decision of the Bar Council of the Kyiv region dated 12 June 2019, as reported on the website of the Bar Council, was made in connection with the beating of a lawyer, Nesvitailo Oleksii Mykolayovich on May 20, 2019. According to the information letter, "it was unanimously decided that, as a result of the strike for the period from June 20 to July 20, 2019, all the advocates of the Kyiv region will stop providing any legal assistance in criminal proceedings in the police, prosecutor's office, courts in the territory of Kiev region (except Kiev). The strike may be terminated earlier in case a suspicion will have been warranted to all the persons guilty of an offense concerning the advocate. " The Bar Council of the Kyiv region decided to inform about the decision taken by the territorial departments of the SJAU, the National Police of Ukraine, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Kyiv region, the prosecutor of the Kiev region, and others like that. Also, the corresponding decision will be brought to the leadership of the Coordination Center for the provision of free secondary legal aid in the Kiev region.
Popular news
Self-government
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding advocacy are unconstitutional interference
The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the advocacy proposed by the National Agency for Corruption Prevention as direct, gross, and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.
Self-government
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published
In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.
URAU
Access to advocate contacts in URAU has been restored
The Bar Council of Ukraine has opened up public access to data from the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, which was closed at the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. The decision was made at a meeting on December 12–13.
Self-government
Members of the QDCB are not required to submit declarations - BCU
Bar Council of Ukraine examined the legal status of members of bar self-government bodies and found that they are not required to submit declarations of persons authorized to perform functions of state or local self-government.
Self-government
BCU has identified 12 areas for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
During its meeting on December 12, the Bar Council of Ukraine considered the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, approved by Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 475-r dated May 14, 2025. The document provides for the development and adoption of a draft law on improving the legal regulation of advocacy by the fourth quarter of 2026.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The Ombudsman acknowledged the problem of violation of the human right to legal aid in the TCC
The Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for human rights Dmytro Lubinets confirmed the existence of a problem with ensuring the constitutional right to professional legal assistance in territorial recruitment and social support centers.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The agreement on the provision of legal assistance is not public – BCU
Bar Council of Ukraine in its decision No. 111 dated October 18, 2025, responded to questions regarding the possibility of concluding legal assistance agreements by accepting a public offer, using an electronic form of the agreement, and posting information about legal assistance on websites.
Discussion
Why preventive measures have turned into preventive punishment in Ukraine: round table discussion
The European approach, enshrined in the CPC, provides for detention as an exceptional preventive measure: courts must prove the impossibility of milder alternatives and carefully assess the risks. In practice, however, it is increasingly being applied almost automatically, eroding standards of freedom.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences