Automatic extension of detention violates the right to defense - Constitutional Court

The Constitution does not provide for the possibility of limiting the right to liberty and security of person, the right to judicial protection, the presumption of innocence and the right to defense. Therefore, the provision of part 6 of Article 615 of the CPC on the possibility of automatic (without a court decision) extension of detention contradicts the Basic Law.
This conclusion was reached by the Constitutional Court in its decision of 18.07.2024 No. 8-r (II)/2024 in the case of guarantees of judicial control over the observance of the rights of persons in custody. The text of the decision is available on the website of the Constitutional Court.
As a reminder, Article 615 of the Criminal Procedure Code regulates the special regime of criminal proceedings under martial law. In particular, according to its part 6, in case of expiration of the court ruling on detention and impossibility of consideration by the court of the issue of extension of the detention period in accordance with the procedure established by this Code, the chosen preventive measure in the form of detention is considered to be extended until the court resolves the relevant issue, but not more than for two months.
Ruslan Onishchenko and Dmytro Havryliuk filed constitutional complaints regarding the compliance of this provision with the Constitution of Ukraine.
When considering the case, the Constitutional Court proceeded from the fact that under the rules of Article 64 of the Basic Law, constitutional rights and freedoms of a person and citizen cannot be restricted, except in cases provided for by the Constitution. The same article specifies which rights and freedoms cannot be restricted. In particular, those provided for in Articles 29 (right to liberty and security of person), 55 (right to judicial protection), 62 (presumption of innocence), 63 (right to defense). Therefore, the Constitutional Court stated that these rights cannot be restricted under martial law.
Analyzing the compliance of Part 6 of Article 615 of the CPC with the said provisions of the Constitution, the judges noted in particular that the obstacles to access to court and violation of the right to be heard in court in such an important matter as the extension of the period of detention established by the contested provisions of the Code means that it is impossible for a person to exercise the right to defense guaranteed by Part 2 of Article 63 of the Basic Law.
Taken together with other circumstances, the Constitutional Court recognized part 6 of Article 615 of the CPC as inconsistent with the Constitution. According to the decision, this provision will cease to be effective on October 19, 2024. The Verkhovna Rada should bring the regulatory framework for extending the term of detention in line with the Constitution and this decision.
According to Article 63(2) of the Constitution, a suspect, accused or defendant has the right to a defense. And it is carried out exclusively by a lawyer (part 4 of Article 131-1 of the Basic Law).
Popular news

Advocacy
Beating of a lawyer in Kharkiv: what is known about the incident in the premises of the MME
When the lawyer began to record violations of her client's rights in the premises of the military medical commission, the defender was pushed out of the room by physical force and her belongings were thrown away. The Verkhovna Rada became interested in the incident, and the Ombudsman took the case under his personal control.

Advocacy
The Verkhovna Rada proposes to grant lawyers a deferral from the draft (criteria)
The mobilization of lawyers has devastating consequences for the system of professional legal aid, as it violates the legal rights and interests of hundreds of thousands of citizens and legal entities to whom male lawyers provide professional legal aid.

Advocacy
Exemption from payment of fees in 2025: what advocates should know
The Bar Council of the region and the Ukrainian National Bar Association may, upon the applications of advocates submitted by December 31, decide to exempt, reduce, or defer the payment of the annual fee for the implementation of the bar self-government.

Advocacy
The annual fee of an advocate in 2025: The BCU has changed the distribution
In 2025, the annual contribution to the bar self-government will continue to be one subsistence minimum for able-bodied persons (UAH 3,028, according to the Law on the State Budget). At the same time, its distribution will change.

Advocacy
Officially: there are more than 70 thousand advocates in Ukraine
Recently, the number of advocates in our country has exceeded 70 thousand. To be more precise, as of today, the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine contains information about 70152 attorneys.

Advocacy
European integration and advocacy: development of the institution through constructive dialogue
Today, unfortunately, there are many pseudo-experts who are confidently undertaking to reform the institution of the bar. At the same time, they are unwilling to study the issue from the inside and deliberately ignore the disastrous consequences of their initiatives for the country.

Advocacy
Some TCCs have become «territories without advocacy» - Lidiya Izovitova
If the prosecution does not like the position of the lawyer, it resorts to pressure, including through territorial centers for recruitment and social support. Physical pressure, accusations of treason, mobilization - all this can be a reaction of the authorities to an active defense.

Advocacy
Lidiya Izovitova: The Law on the Bar is a part of Ukraine's European integration path
The current Law of Ukraine «On the Bar and Practice of Law» is the most modern law on the bar in Europe. Since it embodies European standards of legal profession and self-government, its adoption, among other things, allowed the signing of the Association Agreement with the EU in 2014.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…