Should the court's discretion to extend the deadlines be limited?
The assessment of the validity of the reasons for missing a procedural deadline is within the exclusive discretion of the court that decides the relevant procedural issue. Today, the presence or absence of valid reasons for missing a procedural deadline is assessed by the court's internal conviction.
This was pointed out by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Administrative Law and Procedure following the analysis of the draft Law No. 12072 dated 27.09.2024 «On Amendments to Article 363 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine regarding the renewal by the court of the missed deadline for filing an application for review of a court decision due to newly discovered or exceptional circumstances».
The document proposes to clarify the rules on the procedure and deadline for filing an application for review of a court decision due to newly discovered or exceptional circumstances. Specifically, it would oblige the court assessing the validity of the grounds for missing the deadline to assess the circumstances that served as an obstacle to timely filing an application with the court in connection with:
- the duration of the period that the person missed;
- behavior of the person during this period;
- actions taken by such a person and whether these actions are related to preparations for going to court.
The authors of the legislative initiative note that this position is reflected in the decision of the Administrative Court of Cassation dated January 18, 2024 in case No. 520/10732/21 and should be enshrined in law.
The UNBA noted that the application of the criterion of good cause is provided for by the Code of Administrative Procedure for all procedural terms, except when the Code establishes the impossibility of such renewal.
For example, this criterion is applied when renewing the missed deadline for submitting evidence, filing an administrative claim, appeal and cassation appeal, assessing the grounds for failure to appear in court, and when resolving other issues where the legislator limits the performance of a certain procedural action to a certain procedural time limit.
Instead, none of the provisions of the CAP contains a mandatory list of circumstances to be assessed by the court when deciding whether to renew a certain missed procedural term. This reflects the position of the legislator, according to which the assessment of the validity of the reasons for a particular missed procedural term is within the exclusive discretion of the court.
At the same time, with the adoption of amendments to the procedural codes and the Law «On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges» in 2018, the obligation of all persons to take into account the law enforcement opinions of the Supreme Court was introduced.
Thus, when deciding on the renewal of the missed procedural term specified in part 1 of Article 361 of the CAP, the administrative court is already obliged to be guided by the said opinion of the Supreme Court.
The full comments and suggestions of the UNBA to the Draft Law No. 12072 can be found at the link.
Popular news
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Appointment
A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo
Advocate Irena Maria Ostrozka-Sangushko has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Arab Republic of Egypt, in the city of Cairo. The corresponding Order No. 80, dated March 10, 2026, was signed by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
