Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure


The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.
On May 29, 2025, at around 6:40 p.m., an advocate called the «hotline» of the Committee for the Protection of Advocates' Rights and Guarantees of Advocacy of the National Bar Association and reported that police officers intended to carry out a forceful mobilization directly in the courtroom.
The incident occurred during the consideration of the prosecution's motion to extend the detention in custody in the Podilsky District Court of Kyiv. According to two advocates who participated in the hearing, the prosecutor, who was the procedural opponent in the case, called the police to the court. The police were interested exclusively in the military registration documents of the defenders.
It is noteworthy that law enforcement officers arrived at the Podilsky District Court during the hearing and attempted to detain the defense lawyers to take them to the territorial recruitment center. The advocates regarded this as extra-procedural pressure aimed at obstructing the defense.
Representatives of the UNBA Committee promptly arrived at the scene: Oleksandr Levadnyi, Polina Marchenko, Oleksandr Plavan, Maksym Stryhun, and Oleksii Kalinichenko. Their intervention prevented the violent mobilization of the advocates.
The UNBA Committee emphasized that such actions, regardless of their formal nature, are a manifestation of pressure on lawyers and may be regarded as interference in their professional activities.
If the prosecution does not like the position of an advocate, it resorts to pressure, including through territorial recruitment and social support centers.
Physical pressure, accusations of treason, mobilization — all of this can be a reaction by the authorities to active defense. Read more about this in the article «Some TCCs have become territories without lawyers».
Popular news

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.

Advocacy
Shoulder straps do not fit the robe: Lidiya Izovitova analyzes models of military courts restoration
The Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a working meeting to discuss draft laws that provide for the establishment and operation of military courts in Ukraine on a permanent basis. The Institute of Advocacy presented its reservations regarding this initiative.

Advocacy
UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»
Dzerkalo Tyzhnia's publications about «hacker lawyers» contain false information, distortions and manipulations that undermine the authority of the Bar. They are a form of unlawful pressure on the UNBA and may be an element of a paid-for campaign.

Advocacy
Problems of implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer discussed in the Verkhovna Rada
On April 16, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a joint working meeting to discuss the feasibility of implementing the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer and introducing the necessary amendments to the current legislation.

Advocacy
The BCU creates a working group to monitor violations of the rights of lawyers and will consider appealing to the Verkhovna…
During an extraordinary meeting on April 16, 2025, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided to establish a working group to monitor and summarize the facts of violations of the rights of lawyers and guarantees of the practice of law over the past three years, including the situation with the detention of lawyer Olga Panchenko.

Advocacy
Judicial independence: a priority that has not yet become a reality
Protecting judges from interference is a priority, but its effectiveness in practice raises questions. The High Council of Justice discussed ensuring judicial independence and the authority of justice.

Advocacy
Temporary protection, work, study: what Ukrainians should know about France and UK
What is the procedure for obtaining temporary protection status in France and the UK? When can it be refused and is it possible to appeal such a decision? What are the options for legalization and change of status? What about employment, education and business opportunities?
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…