The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Advocacy
17:29 Fri 13.06.25 158 Reviews
Print

On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

On June 7, 2025, the Bar Council of Ukraine, as the body responsible for forming the Competition Commission, discussed the criteria for selecting representatives to the Competition Commission during its meeting. However, due to the lack of a notification from the High Council of Justice as required by law, the BCU was unable to begin exercising its new powers as defined by the Law on the Judiciary. Therefore, President of the BCU sent a letter to the HCJ, as the five-day deadline for notifying the entities responsible for forming the Competition Commission had already expired.

The HCJ failed to publish the mandatory announcement on the selection of candidates in the newspaper Holos Ukrainy and on the HCJ 's official website, and did not send a written notification to the Bar Council of Ukraine. Such inaction is contrary to the requirements of Article 95-1 of the Law «On the Judicial System and Status of Judges».

We remind you that on June 1, 2025, the term of office of the first composition of the Competition Commission appointed by the High Council of Justice two years ago expired. According to the current legislation, the High Council of Justice was required to publish an announcement on the selection of candidates and information on the conditions of the competition in Holos Ukrainy and on its official website within five days after the termination of the powers of the previous composition (by June 6).

Also, no later than the day after the announcement was published on its website, the High Council of Justice had to send a written notification about the start of the competition to all entities involved in forming the Competition Commission with a request to submit candidates.

The Bar Council of Ukraine, as a body forming the commission, must propose candidates from its quota (one person) within twenty days of the publication of the announcement. The BCU must submit at least two candidates to the Competition Commission, from among whom the HCJ appoints one member of the commission within five days of receiving the proposal.

As of June 13, no mandatory actions have been taken by the High Council of Justice.

The Ukrainian National Bar Association emphasizes that this situation is unacceptable for a democratic society and causes concern among the legal community regarding the possible inaction of a constitutional body.

The Ukrainian National Bar Association asks the High Council of Justice to explain why it has not complied with the legal requirements.

Denys Maslov, the Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy, has also been informed about the situation.

Popular news

The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Self-government

The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

17:18 Mon 23.06.25 115
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window

Advocacy

Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window

On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

13:34 Fri 20.06.25 166
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility

Advocacy

Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility

Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

18:02 Mon 16.06.25 123
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Advocacy

The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…

On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

17:29 Fri 13.06.25 159
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

Advocacy

UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

14:19 Fri 06.06.25 176
Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency

Advocacy

Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has appointed Andriy Osipov as head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency.

19:38 Fri 30.05.25 116
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

Advocacy

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

16:35 Fri 30.05.25 256
The specifics of translating documents for the UK and Ukraine were explored in a webinar

Advocacy

The specifics of translating documents for the UK and Ukraine were explored in a webinar

In legal practice, document translation is increasingly becoming a subject of attention not only for translators, but also for advocates, courts, and government agencies. What should a translation be like to be legally valid in Ukraine and the UK, what mistakes can ruin a case, and who is responsible for accuracy?

10:46 Thu 22.05.25 105

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл