Meeting of Kyiv City Advocates of September 20 has no authority to establish self-government bodies
The meeting of advocates, of which the Bar Council of Ukraine was notified by the advocate Valentyn Stepiuk, and which was scheduled to be held on September 20 at 17:00 in the conference hall of UBI Fashion Center at the address 8 Dorohozhytska Street, had no authority to form the bar self-government bodies.
This “fake” meeting and the conference to which this meeting has planned to elect delegates are conducted contrary to the Law “On the Bar and Practice of Law” and the BCU decisions.
Notifying of such “meeting of advocates”, the author of communication does not provide the Bar Council of Ukraine with the text of decision on holding a meeting and a conference by a duly authorized body. Currently, this is the Kyiv City Bar Council, elected in October 2016.
The BCU draws attention to the fact that in order to conduct the regional conferences the BCU shall first approve the rules, the procedure and quota of representation by its decision. Such a decision may be taken at the request of the regional bar council. At present, the Kyiv City Bar Council, elected in October 2016, did not address the BCU for holding a meeting and a conference of advocates on these dates.
There is no decision on holding the meeting on September 20 and the conference on October 7, likewise there is no decision of the legitimate Kyiv City Bar Council to convene such a conference on these dates.
“Thus, the fake meeting of advocates, held on September 20 in Kyiv, is not a proper meeting within the meaning of the Law “On the Bar and Practice of Law”, has been conducted without BCU decisions, the approved regulations, etc., and has no authority to form the self-government bodies”, — emphasized the UNBA, BCU President Lidiia Izovitova.
Since similar actions have already been taken in order to mislead the bar community of the city by organizations that have illegally assumed the names and powers of self-government bodies, the BCU will make reference to the law enforcement agencies and send disciplinary complaints against the advocates, who organize such pseudostructures in the capital.Popular news
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Discussion
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture
To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Court practice
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026
During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.
Court practice
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates
The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates