On July 17, 2018 there was held a special meeting of the Committee on protection of advocate's rights and professional guarantees.
During the meeting, the participants discussed issues concerning publications spread by a People's Deputy of Ukraine Ihor Mosiichuk in social media, that may contain the calls for military intervention and upsetting of planned work of the bar self-government of the city of Kiev. Following the discussion there was initiated submission of appeals to the police to ensure public order during exercising by the Bar self-government of its lawful authority, in particular, consideration of disciplinary proceedings.
The Committee considered the appeal of an advocate Anna Babych concerning violation of advocates' guarantees, namely prohibition of any meddling, interference with the pursuit of professional activities and carrying out in respect of the advocate of search operations or investigative actions that can be carried out only with the permission of the court. An advocate Ye. Solodko initiated an appeal to the Director of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine with a request to investigate and bring the guilty officials of the National Anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine to responsibility established by law.
There was considered a significant violation of Article 23 of the Law of Ukraine "On the Bar and Practice of Law" at the request of the Bar Association "Bogatyr & Partners" in relation to systematic unlawful limitation of essential human rights of advocate V. V. Bogatyr, as a result of disrespecting the state guarantees determined by the Law and related to the actual non-observance of the procedure, set forth in the CPC of Ukraine, of declaring suspicion to an advocate, as a special person. The attention was focused on the lack of competence with some employees of bodies of pre-trial investigation as to the presumption of legality of judicial action, in particular, agreement with an advocate and unlawful claims of law enforcement officers to provide additional documents supporting the validity of such agreement, which is contrary to the substantive law provisions. Relevant documents on the results of consideration of the application of the Bar Association "Bogatyr & Partners" in the interests of advocate V.V. Bogatyr will be included in the Report on violations of the rights of advocates in Ukraine, which will be submitted to the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) and the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (ССВЕ).
The question of systematic disregard for the professional rights of advocates and the production of relevant documents was decided to be entrusted to the members of the Committee Ye. Miroshnykov and K. Chetvertak.
The Committee discussed and decided to respond to the systematic appeals concerning violations of advocates' rights and professional guarantees of advocate O. Shadrin. Drafting of the project for admissibility of appeals was entrusted to the Committee member S. Chernushych.
After hearing the audio recording of speech of advocate D. Bugai, the Committee criticized his public remarks before the international experts and representatives of the bodies of justice, in which he had expressed criticisms of the role of professional organizations in protecting advocates' rights. The emphasis was made that D. Bugai had never been a member of any body of the Bar self-government nor had been authorized by them to represent positions and interests of the Ukrainian Bar. In fact, D. Bugai, received protection and support from a professional bar organization, when he was pursued by law enforcement bodies. In contrast, he did not provide such support to his colleagues, did not show any interest in the activities of the UNBA Steering Committee on protection of advocates' rights, did not receive information of statistical or dynamic character, did not participate in the Committee's public events. Thus, the Committee regards his speech as demagoguery, having the aim of creating a personal image of questionable content.
However, the Committee is open to cooperation and invites everyone to become a member of the Committee, all those who consider themselves experts in this field and are ready to spare no effort and time to defend violated professional rights and guarantees.
The information on all issues discussed was forwarded to the UNBA President for further direction of appropriate appeals within the limits of competence.
The Committee's next meeting is scheduled for September 10, 2018 at 15-00.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Self-government
Efforts to develop advocacy must be brought to fruition — A. Misyats
The Ukrainian advocacy profession is currently going through a critical phase. Amid the war, it must ensure the continuity of legal aid, defend the independence of the profession, and improve qualification and disciplinary procedures in accordance with European standards. The work that has been started must be brought to a practical conclusion.
Support
Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA
On September 18, a working meeting was held at the office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with Executive Director of the International Bar Association (IBA) Mark Ellis. The parties discussed the Ukrainian advocacy profession’s participation in European legal processes, the protection of the UNBA’s digital infrastructure, psychological support for advocates and future areas of cooperation.
Educational events
Tax residency of Ukrainians abroad: what matters
The determination of tax residency for Ukrainians who have been living abroad for an extended period depends on the combination of their personal and economic ties to each country. The established status determines the procedure for reporting income, paying taxes and fulfilling CFC reporting obligations.
War
Are Europe's advocacy associations prepared for a potential war? V. Gvozdiy shared lessons from the Ukrainian experience
The continuity of the bar’s self-governance, the protection of professional registries and archives, as well as equal guarantees of employment for advocates, judges, and prosecutors must be enshrined in advance in legislation in the event of war or another emergency.
Legal defence of military personnel
Payments to military personnel require clear and uniform criteria — UNBA Committee
The vagueness of terms in subordinate regulatory acts leads to differing interpretations of the grounds for paying additional compensation to military personnel. The UNBA has proposed harmonizing these acts and establishing transparent criteria for the allocation of funds.
Discussion
Finding them isn't enough: issues surrounding the seizure and return of crypto assets
The technical structure of transactions does not automatically identify the person who controlled the crypto wallet, and courts have reached differing conclusions on whether a digital asset can be seized as physical evidence. So how can one prove ownership of such assets, enforce court orders, and return funds to victims?
Legislation
The UNBA will prepare guidelines on lawyers' requests
By the end of 2026, the UNBA Committee on the prevention of administrative offenses committed against advocates will develop guidelines on drafting advocate inquiries and responding to refusals to provide information. There are also plans to standardize the practice of applying Article 212-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection