The draft law № 9055 won’t make the litigation either faster or more qualitative — people's deputies
People's deputies from different fractions criticize the draft law № 9055 »On the Bar and Advocacy" and urge the colleagues not to support it.
This was stated by Yurii Miroshnychenko, Leonid Yemets and Denys Sylantiev on the air of the TV channel "Rada".
"On this Day of the Bar, we must state that there is a huge danger to the bar and the role of advocate as a whole. Therefore, I hope colleagues will consider this argument and make the only possible decision. This issue should be resolved in such a way as to pass a law on a bar, which does not contain any tools for depriving an advocate of the opportunity to protect a citizen of Ukraine," — said Leonid Yemets. First of all, among the dangers of the draft law he defined the opportunity to bring the advocate to liability for abuse of procedural rights, as well as violation of the right of a person to counsel of free choice.
"Advocates are accused of using the disadvantages of legislation, but instead of correcting the shortcomings of the legislation, the Criminal Code, they decided to give the judge the right to rule over an advocate and tell him or her how to protect or not protect a person. This is the work of the advocate — to find these loopholes and use them, and the work of the legislator - to change the laws so that they work, to close the "hole" in the legislation, so that it does not have double interpretations," — said Leonid Yemets.
Yurii Miroshnychenko emphasized that the proposed law will not make litigation either faster or more qualitative. "What is valuable for us — a speed of trial or its quality? Protecting human rights and freedoms or closing a case? The task of the litigation is to find out the truth, but not to go quickly all the stages of the process. If we weaken such a powerful institute, which is the bar all over the world, we will lose both speed and quality. If there are good intentions to accelerate the process, this should be solved in another way," — said Yurii Miroshnychenko.
He emphasized that advocates are already put in discriminatory conditions in the confrontation with law enforcement agencies under the current law. «There is a whole system of public investigation, thousands of people, opportunities, coercion behind the prosecutor's office. And, on the opposite side, there is an advocate who got the right to obtain evidence but did not receive the toolkit. In these circumstances, blaming the advocate for using the possibilities provided by the law to protect the client from us, parliamentarians, would not be honest,» — said Yurii Miroshnychenko. He stated that the Opposition bloc's fraction does not support the draft law № 9055. "Today it's time to protect the advocates because tomorrow there will be no one to protect us from the tyranny of the dishonest representatives of the legal system," — the People's Deputy said.
People's Deputy Denys Sylantiev stressed that the draft law was not developed professionally and was not agreed with the bar community. "We see results when the initiative involves only a few people who have not studied the problem thoroughly. Therefore, we are constantly hurrying, because there is no time to do something good, and then have time to redo it," — said the deputy of the Radical party.
The full video of the "PROParliament" program on the TV channel "Rada" of December 19 can be viewed here.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences